Talent Management - October 2008 - (Page 24) recruitment & retention assessment & evaluation compensation & benefits performance management learning & development succession planning When an individual takes one of TGI’s assessments, he or she may read a series of movie plots that have different roles. After each plot the individual is asked, “Which role is most like you and which is least like you?” A detailed report is then generated and provided to the hiring manager. “You assess in order to predict, and you predict in order to control outcome,” Presser said. “If you want to control outcome, you need to have people who are flexible, nimble and know how to work off each other. If you can get that, then whatever happens tomorrow, you have an organization that will be able to meet it.” Cathy Scott, president of District Council 47 of the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees (AFSCME), is using TGI’s role-based assessment to determine her current employees’ roles. Each employee will take the assessment, and once the Honing in on the Target Role Amie Lawrence, Ph.D., and Tracey Tafero, Ph.D. What is it that makes A-players so effective in the workplace? The underlying characteristics of top performers likely differ depending on the particular role. Understanding role-specific performance drivers and using assessments designed to measure the characteristics critical to each particular role greatly increases the likelihood of hiring and developing a high-potential workforce. What Is A Role-Based Assessment? An assessment is any evaluation tool that presents a series of questions or items with the intended purpose of evaluating an individual against a set of predetermined competencies or characteristics. There are many types of assessments; most are generic and designed for use across roles. A role-based assessment has a more fine-grained focus and measures key success factors for a particular role such as sales or customer service. Often, the assessment itself or the scoring has been customized to maximize the predictive accuracy for the target role. The assessment content may be considered off the shelf, but the manner in which the scores are interpreted allows the organization to quickly draw conclusions about the specific role. Why Use Role-Based Assessments? ROI from an assessment is fueled by how well it identifies individuals who are a good fit for the target position. Role-based assessments tend to be more accurate than non-role-based ones because they focus specifically on the success characteristics for a particular role and do not to measure less relevant factors. A role-based assessment should be designed so the user is confident assessment scores are key indicators of top talent for a particular role. Role-based assessments also are easier to interpret. Assessments that take a one-size-fits-all approach tend to measure a variety of individual characteristics, some of which are integral to success, while others are not. With these assessments, understanding how to interpret the results can be confusing, and it is difficult to determine the employees’ overall fit with the target role. Role-based assessments focus only on the relevant success factors. For this reason, the results clearly show how well the individual fits the role. How to Use Role-Based Assessments In companies and organizations of all kinds, role-based assessments can be used for either selection or developmental purposes. In both cases, the first step is to conduct a job analysis and develop an understanding of the key success factors for the target role. Knowing what makes someone a strong performer helps in deciding what assessment should be used to ensure a good fit for the role. If the assessment is used for selection purposes, the information from the job analysis determines the organization’s acceptable score ranges on the assessment. Scores on factors that are strongly related to success on the job should be more heavily considered than factors that are less important. When role-based assessments are used, organizations increase the likelihood of hiring high-performing employees. When role-based assessments are used for developmental purposes, employees complete the assessment, and results are compared to a success profile established from job analysis. The results will show who is a good fit and who is a poor fit for the target role. Employees are able to gain personal or professional insight by learning about strengths and any necessary developmental areas. They can use this information to create personal development plans that better prepare them for their current roles or develop them for future roles. Ultimately, thinking inside the box with role-based assessments increases the likelihood an organization will effectively identify the right person for the right job. This, in turn, leads to overall growth and productivity for the employee and the company. Amie Lawrence, Ph.D., is a senior research consultant, and Tracey Tafero, Ph.D., is a senior consultant at Select International Inc., a global assessment systems provider. They can be reached at editor@talentmgt.com. 24 talent management magazine www.talentmgt.com http://www.talentmgt.com
Table of Contents Feed for the Digital Edition of Talent Management - October 2008 Talent Management - October 2008 Editor’s Letter Contents Human Performance Leading Edge Foundations The Three Pillars of Executive On-Boarding Role-Based Assessment: Thinking Inside the Box Who's Going to Speak Up for Health Care? Obey the Push to Automate Managing the Star Performer No One Wants to Work With Adopting a Mutual-Funds Model for Talent Management Hewlett-Packard: Simple Talent Management in a Technical World Team Effort Pays in Talent at London Business School The Employee Survey: What’s in It for Me? Why Most Managers Are Stuck Advertisers’ Index Editorial Resources Full Potential Talent Management - October 2008 Talent Management - October 2008 - (Page Intro) Talent Management - October 2008 - Talent Management - October 2008 (Page Cover1) Talent Management - October 2008 - Talent Management - October 2008 (Page Cover2) Talent Management - October 2008 - Talent Management - October 2008 (Page 3) Talent Management - October 2008 - Editor’s Letter (Page 4) Talent Management - October 2008 - Editor’s Letter (Page 5) Talent Management - October 2008 - Editor’s Letter (Page 6) Talent Management - October 2008 - Editor’s Letter (Page 7) Talent Management - October 2008 - Contents (Page 8) Talent Management - October 2008 - Contents (Page 9) Talent Management - October 2008 - Human Performance (Page 10) Talent Management - October 2008 - Human Performance (Page 11) Talent Management - October 2008 - Leading Edge (Page 12) Talent Management - October 2008 - Leading Edge (Page 13) Talent Management - October 2008 - Foundations (Page 14) Talent Management - October 2008 - Foundations (Page 15) Talent Management - October 2008 - The Three Pillars of Executive On-Boarding (Page 16) Talent Management - October 2008 - The Three Pillars of Executive On-Boarding (Page 17) Talent Management - October 2008 - The Three Pillars of Executive On-Boarding (Page 18) Talent Management - October 2008 - The Three Pillars of Executive On-Boarding (Page 19) Talent Management - October 2008 - The Three Pillars of Executive On-Boarding (Page 20) Talent Management - October 2008 - The Three Pillars of Executive On-Boarding (Page 21) Talent Management - October 2008 - Role-Based Assessment: Thinking Inside the Box (Page 22) Talent Management - October 2008 - Role-Based Assessment: Thinking Inside the Box (Page 23) Talent Management - October 2008 - Role-Based Assessment: Thinking Inside the Box (Page 24) Talent Management - October 2008 - Role-Based Assessment: Thinking Inside the Box (Page 25) Talent Management - October 2008 - Role-Based Assessment: Thinking Inside the Box (Page 26) Talent Management - October 2008 - Role-Based Assessment: Thinking Inside the Box (Page 27) Talent Management - October 2008 - Who's Going to Speak Up for Health Care? (Page 28) Talent Management - October 2008 - Who's Going to Speak Up for Health Care? (Page 29) Talent Management - October 2008 - Who's Going to Speak Up for Health Care? (Page 30) Talent Management - October 2008 - Who's Going to Speak Up for Health Care? (Page 31) Talent Management - October 2008 - Obey the Push to Automate (Page 32) Talent Management - October 2008 - Obey the Push to Automate (Page 33) Talent Management - October 2008 - Obey the Push to Automate (Page 34) Talent Management - October 2008 - Obey the Push to Automate (Page 35) Talent Management - October 2008 - Obey the Push to Automate (Page 36) Talent Management - October 2008 - Obey the Push to Automate (Page 37) Talent Management - October 2008 - Managing the Star Performer No One Wants to Work With (Page 38) Talent Management - October 2008 - Managing the Star Performer No One Wants to Work With (Page 39) Talent Management - October 2008 - Adopting a Mutual-Funds Model for Talent Management (Page 40) Talent Management - October 2008 - Adopting a Mutual-Funds Model for Talent Management (Page 41) Talent Management - October 2008 - Adopting a Mutual-Funds Model for Talent Management (Page 42) Talent Management - October 2008 - Adopting a Mutual-Funds Model for Talent Management (Page 43) Talent Management - October 2008 - Hewlett-Packard: Simple Talent Management in a Technical World (Page 44) Talent Management - October 2008 - Hewlett-Packard: Simple Talent Management in a Technical World (Page 45) Talent Management - October 2008 - Hewlett-Packard: Simple Talent Management in a Technical World (Page 46) Talent Management - October 2008 - Hewlett-Packard: Simple Talent Management in a Technical World (Page 47) Talent Management - October 2008 - Team Effort Pays in Talent at London Business School (Page 48) Talent Management - October 2008 - Team Effort Pays in Talent at London Business School (Page 49) Talent Management - October 2008 - The Employee Survey: What’s in It for Me? (Page 50) Talent Management - October 2008 - The Employee Survey: What’s in It for Me? (Page 51) Talent Management - October 2008 - Why Most Managers Are Stuck (Page 52) Talent Management - October 2008 - Why Most Managers Are Stuck (Page 53) Talent Management - October 2008 - Why Most Managers Are Stuck (Page 54) Talent Management - October 2008 - Why Most Managers Are Stuck (Page 55) Talent Management - October 2008 - Why Most Managers Are Stuck (Page 56) Talent Management - October 2008 - Editorial Resources (Page 57) Talent Management - October 2008 - Full Potential (Page 58) Talent Management - October 2008 - Full Potential (Page Cover3) Talent Management - October 2008 - Full Potential (Page Cover4)
For optimal viewing of this digital publication, please enable JavaScript and then refresh the page. If you would like to try to load the digital publication without using Flash Player detection, please click here.