Talent Management - October 2008 - (Page 51) Increased response rates create options because they allow the luxury of smaller invitee lists and enable employee rotation through the process, thereby eliminating fatigue. Remember, not every employee needs to respond to get a statistically significant sample. Significance is achieved by approximately 300 respondents, even for very large organizations. Knowing response rates and required sample sizes provides the data needed to intelligently manage respondent rotation. Progressive organizations take regular feedback a step further by integrating employee feedback into business processes that directly impact employees. This promotes a corporate culture of active listening. Transactional surveys are normally small and targeted and therefore are perceived as benign, resulting in positive response rates. Capturing the employee’s sentiment at the time of the transaction, rather than a memory of the transaction months later, also provides more accurate feedback. Communities have emerged as a critical tool to build and maintain customer loyalty and satisfaction, but such communities can be an equally effective tool to improve employee feedback. Organizations such as IBM have found building thriving employee communities promotes a sense of shared experience and a sense of influence, which are important to build a strong bond in the organization. That bond creates willingness to participate in surveys. Add regular feedback processes to the community to create a shared employee voice, and take this connection to the next level. Community recruitment begins by clearly articulating to the prospective respondent the benefit of taking part in the process and how much time they will be asked to invest. Having an established Respondent Bill of Rights that can be communicated during the recruitment process can help set the proper expectations. Once a respondent agrees to be part of the process — a double opt-in is best to ensure they are aware of what they are agreeing to — the next step is to build deep profiles of each respondent. This allows for more targeted feedback initiatives that focus on issues or concerns within specific groups or departments. Profile data also can be collected from the organization’s HR systems and loaded directly into the profile to shorten set-up time. The profile is then leveraged to keep surveys short, as the standard demographic questions are no longer needed. An employee community can extend dialogue beyond the traditional survey process, delivering the elusive match of quantitative and qualitative research. Surveys provide the quantitative side of the process, and organizations can survey the entire community or elect to create panels from the community specifically for the purpose of feedback. These community panels are extremely cost-effective, and if done properly, have a great track record of increasing employee satisfaction and positively impacting retention. Qualitative research comes from leveraging collaborative community tools such as forums, wikis and blogs that allow for active dialogues between employees and between the organization and employees. While an employee survey may ask about specific programs DASHBOARD continued on page 56 October 2008 talent management magazine www.talentmgt.com 51 http://www.talentmgt.com
Table of Contents Feed for the Digital Edition of Talent Management - October 2008 Talent Management - October 2008 Editor’s Letter Contents Human Performance Leading Edge Foundations The Three Pillars of Executive On-Boarding Role-Based Assessment: Thinking Inside the Box Who's Going to Speak Up for Health Care? Obey the Push to Automate Managing the Star Performer No One Wants to Work With Adopting a Mutual-Funds Model for Talent Management Hewlett-Packard: Simple Talent Management in a Technical World Team Effort Pays in Talent at London Business School The Employee Survey: What’s in It for Me? Why Most Managers Are Stuck Advertisers’ Index Editorial Resources Full Potential Talent Management - October 2008 Talent Management - October 2008 - (Page Intro) Talent Management - October 2008 - Talent Management - October 2008 (Page Cover1) Talent Management - October 2008 - Talent Management - October 2008 (Page Cover2) Talent Management - October 2008 - Talent Management - October 2008 (Page 3) Talent Management - October 2008 - Editor’s Letter (Page 4) Talent Management - October 2008 - Editor’s Letter (Page 5) Talent Management - October 2008 - Editor’s Letter (Page 6) Talent Management - October 2008 - Editor’s Letter (Page 7) Talent Management - October 2008 - Contents (Page 8) Talent Management - October 2008 - Contents (Page 9) Talent Management - October 2008 - Human Performance (Page 10) Talent Management - October 2008 - Human Performance (Page 11) Talent Management - October 2008 - Leading Edge (Page 12) Talent Management - October 2008 - Leading Edge (Page 13) Talent Management - October 2008 - Foundations (Page 14) Talent Management - October 2008 - Foundations (Page 15) Talent Management - October 2008 - The Three Pillars of Executive On-Boarding (Page 16) Talent Management - October 2008 - The Three Pillars of Executive On-Boarding (Page 17) Talent Management - October 2008 - The Three Pillars of Executive On-Boarding (Page 18) Talent Management - October 2008 - The Three Pillars of Executive On-Boarding (Page 19) Talent Management - October 2008 - The Three Pillars of Executive On-Boarding (Page 20) Talent Management - October 2008 - The Three Pillars of Executive On-Boarding (Page 21) Talent Management - October 2008 - Role-Based Assessment: Thinking Inside the Box (Page 22) Talent Management - October 2008 - Role-Based Assessment: Thinking Inside the Box (Page 23) Talent Management - October 2008 - Role-Based Assessment: Thinking Inside the Box (Page 24) Talent Management - October 2008 - Role-Based Assessment: Thinking Inside the Box (Page 25) Talent Management - October 2008 - Role-Based Assessment: Thinking Inside the Box (Page 26) Talent Management - October 2008 - Role-Based Assessment: Thinking Inside the Box (Page 27) Talent Management - October 2008 - Who's Going to Speak Up for Health Care? (Page 28) Talent Management - October 2008 - Who's Going to Speak Up for Health Care? (Page 29) Talent Management - October 2008 - Who's Going to Speak Up for Health Care? (Page 30) Talent Management - October 2008 - Who's Going to Speak Up for Health Care? (Page 31) Talent Management - October 2008 - Obey the Push to Automate (Page 32) Talent Management - October 2008 - Obey the Push to Automate (Page 33) Talent Management - October 2008 - Obey the Push to Automate (Page 34) Talent Management - October 2008 - Obey the Push to Automate (Page 35) Talent Management - October 2008 - Obey the Push to Automate (Page 36) Talent Management - October 2008 - Obey the Push to Automate (Page 37) Talent Management - October 2008 - Managing the Star Performer No One Wants to Work With (Page 38) Talent Management - October 2008 - Managing the Star Performer No One Wants to Work With (Page 39) Talent Management - October 2008 - Adopting a Mutual-Funds Model for Talent Management (Page 40) Talent Management - October 2008 - Adopting a Mutual-Funds Model for Talent Management (Page 41) Talent Management - October 2008 - Adopting a Mutual-Funds Model for Talent Management (Page 42) Talent Management - October 2008 - Adopting a Mutual-Funds Model for Talent Management (Page 43) Talent Management - October 2008 - Hewlett-Packard: Simple Talent Management in a Technical World (Page 44) Talent Management - October 2008 - Hewlett-Packard: Simple Talent Management in a Technical World (Page 45) Talent Management - October 2008 - Hewlett-Packard: Simple Talent Management in a Technical World (Page 46) Talent Management - October 2008 - Hewlett-Packard: Simple Talent Management in a Technical World (Page 47) Talent Management - October 2008 - Team Effort Pays in Talent at London Business School (Page 48) Talent Management - October 2008 - Team Effort Pays in Talent at London Business School (Page 49) Talent Management - October 2008 - The Employee Survey: What’s in It for Me? (Page 50) Talent Management - October 2008 - The Employee Survey: What’s in It for Me? (Page 51) Talent Management - October 2008 - Why Most Managers Are Stuck (Page 52) Talent Management - October 2008 - Why Most Managers Are Stuck (Page 53) Talent Management - October 2008 - Why Most Managers Are Stuck (Page 54) Talent Management - October 2008 - Why Most Managers Are Stuck (Page 55) Talent Management - October 2008 - Why Most Managers Are Stuck (Page 56) Talent Management - October 2008 - Editorial Resources (Page 57) Talent Management - October 2008 - Full Potential (Page 58) Talent Management - October 2008 - Full Potential (Page Cover3) Talent Management - October 2008 - Full Potential (Page Cover4)
For optimal viewing of this digital publication, please enable JavaScript and then refresh the page. If you would like to try to load the digital publication without using Flash Player detection, please click here.