TM - November 2007 - (Page 26) recruitment & retention assessment & evaluation compensation & benefits performance management learning & development succession planning A Foundational Role Lisa Rummler Job candidates aren’t always what they’re cracked up to be, which can make life difficult for recruiters and hiring managers. Someone who seems great on paper and aces a job interview might end up going through the motions on the job and clashing with co-workers in the process. There are ways to minimize hiring risks, however. “It’s critical for an organization to first understand what it’s looking for because, as with any destination, if you’re going off in the wrong direction, you’ll get to the wrong place real fast,” said Manny Avramidis, American Management Association senior vice president for global human resources. “A mistake organizations make is that they go out there without first thinking through the actual job itself and what’s important to an organization from a fit perspective. “Once that foundation has been established, an organization is ready to do a search. A challenge an organization faces is it never establishes a foundation — they just go out there and say, ‘I need a marketing professional,’ and they don’t tie it in to the other pillars, if you will, that are important to make sure the person will fit into the organization.” To establish that foundation, Avramidis said hiring professionals ought to ask certain questions such as: • Does the organization have identified corporate values? • What are the core competencies most jobs would expect? • Is it clear into what absolute role the job candidate will fit? Does that align with the corporate vision? And once a candidate enters the interview phase of a job application, the tables should turn — Avramidis recommended that a job applicant have the opportunity to ask questions, not just of the interviewer but of potential co-workers and other people in the company. In doing so, individuals can better gauge how they could fit in at the organization, and the hiring manager or other HR professionals also can determine their fit, using the individuals’ questions and whom they ask to speak to as indicators. Another tactic during the interview process, Avramidis said, is to ask candidates open-ended questions. This eliminates the chance that individuals will give tailored answers. “Today, most candidates search your Web site to the point that they know as much as you do about your organization before they come in. You have to find questions they can’t find answers to on the Web site,” he said. “For instance, if you have a candidate in front of you, and you say, ‘Describe your ideal boss,’ and they say, ‘My ideal boss is someone who just leaves me alone, who calls me once a week and asks me how things are going.’ Yet you know within the organization, your management style is somewhere along the lines of constant communication, constant recognition, daily or frequent meetings and so forth, that person doesn’t fit.” Avramidis said one of the most critical open-ended questions to ask candidates is where they see themselves in two to three years. “If the person is someone who’s coming in who is going to realize their potential by taking on bigger responsibility, and they expect within two years to be, say, three levels above where they are coming in, and you know your organization is not going to have that opportunity for them, you’re almost destined for failure,” he said. “Or, within 18 months or maybe a year, that person is looking for another job.” What Candidates Have Done Based on the premise the best predictor of future behavior often is past behavior, these assessments include structured interview questions about experiences, resumereview tools that evaluate candidates based on work history, knowledge tests that measure things candidates have learned and prescreening questionnaires that ask candidates about job-relevant experiences, educational achievements, skills and credentials. These assessments’ main limitation is that people are not hired for what they have done but for what they will do. Candidates often are hired to do jobs that require them to do things they never have had an opportunity to do (e.g., hiring recent graduates). Overemphasizing experience also can decrease the pool of available candidates in a tight labor market. Although assessments that focus on measuring what candidates have done should be a key part of any selection process, they should not form the sole means to evaluate candidates. What Candidates Can Do These assessments measure characteristics associated with a candidate’s underlying personality and ability. Natural traits can make people predisposed for success in certain kinds of jobs. For example, just as most successful basketball players tend to be tall, most successful salespeople tend to be extroverted. You do not necessarily need to be tall to be a successful basketball player, nor do you need to be extroverted to be a good salesperson, but it helps. Assessments that measure traits associated with what candidates “can do” often predict job performance far 26 talent management magazine www.TalentMgt.com http://www.TalentMgt.com
Table of Contents Feed for the Digital Edition of TM - November 2007 Talent Management - November 2007 Editor's Letter Contents Letters to the Editor Human Performance Leading Edge Learning Connections Viewpoint Finding Candidates with the Right Fit Turning HR Data Into Business Intelligence Compensation Technology: Drive Higher Performance, Gain Competitive Advantage The Art and Science of Influence Training the Ethical Workforce Making the Best Managers Application: Pre-Hire Testing Drives Down Employee Turnover at Advnace Auto Parts Dashboard: The Role of Learning Business Process Outsourcing Insight: Nationwide Insurance: On Employees' Side Advertiser's Index Editorial Resources Full Potential TM - November 2007 TM - November 2007 - Talent Management - November 2007 (Page Cover1) TM - November 2007 - Talent Management - November 2007 (Page Cover2) TM - November 2007 - Talent Management - November 2007 (Page 3) TM - November 2007 - Editor's Letter (Page 4) TM - November 2007 - Editor's Letter (Page 5) TM - November 2007 - Editor's Letter (Page 6) TM - November 2007 - Editor's Letter (Page 7) TM - November 2007 - Contents (Page 8) TM - November 2007 - Contents (Page 9) TM - November 2007 - Contents (Page 10) TM - November 2007 - Contents (Page 11) TM - November 2007 - Letters to the Editor (Page 12) TM - November 2007 - Letters to the Editor (Page 13) TM - November 2007 - Human Performance (Page 14) TM - November 2007 - Human Performance (Page 15) TM - November 2007 - Leading Edge (Page 16) TM - November 2007 - Leading Edge (Page 17) TM - November 2007 - Learning Connections (Page 18) TM - November 2007 - Learning Connections (Page 19) TM - November 2007 - Viewpoint (Page 20) TM - November 2007 - Viewpoint (Page 21) TM - November 2007 - Finding Candidates with the Right Fit (Page 22) TM - November 2007 - Finding Candidates with the Right Fit (Page 23) TM - November 2007 - Finding Candidates with the Right Fit (Page 24) TM - November 2007 - Finding Candidates with the Right Fit (Page 25) TM - November 2007 - Finding Candidates with the Right Fit (Page 26) TM - November 2007 - Finding Candidates with the Right Fit (Page 27) TM - November 2007 - Turning HR Data Into Business Intelligence (Page 28) TM - November 2007 - Turning HR Data Into Business Intelligence (Page 29) TM - November 2007 - Turning HR Data Into Business Intelligence (Page 30) TM - November 2007 - Turning HR Data Into Business Intelligence (Page 31) TM - November 2007 - Turning HR Data Into Business Intelligence (Page 32) TM - November 2007 - Turning HR Data Into Business Intelligence (Page 33) TM - November 2007 - Compensation Technology: Drive Higher Performance, Gain Competitive Advantage (Page 34) TM - November 2007 - Compensation Technology: Drive Higher Performance, Gain Competitive Advantage (Page 35) TM - November 2007 - Compensation Technology: Drive Higher Performance, Gain Competitive Advantage (Page 36) TM - November 2007 - Compensation Technology: Drive Higher Performance, Gain Competitive Advantage (Page 37) TM - November 2007 - Compensation Technology: Drive Higher Performance, Gain Competitive Advantage (Page 38) TM - November 2007 - Compensation Technology: Drive Higher Performance, Gain Competitive Advantage (Page 39) TM - November 2007 - The Art and Science of Influence (Page 40) TM - November 2007 - The Art and Science of Influence (Page 41) TM - November 2007 - The Art and Science of Influence (Page 42) TM - November 2007 - The Art and Science of Influence (Page 43) TM - November 2007 - The Art and Science of Influence (Page 44) TM - November 2007 - The Art and Science of Influence (Page 45) TM - November 2007 - Training the Ethical Workforce (Page 46) TM - November 2007 - Training the Ethical Workforce (Page 47) TM - November 2007 - Training the Ethical Workforce (Page 48) TM - November 2007 - Training the Ethical Workforce (Page 49) TM - November 2007 - Making the Best Managers (Page 50) TM - November 2007 - Making the Best Managers (Page 51) TM - November 2007 - Making the Best Managers (Page 52) TM - November 2007 - Making the Best Managers (Page 53) TM - November 2007 - Application: Pre-Hire Testing Drives Down Employee Turnover at Advnace Auto Parts (Page 54) TM - November 2007 - Application: Pre-Hire Testing Drives Down Employee Turnover at Advnace Auto Parts (Page 55) TM - November 2007 - Application: Pre-Hire Testing Drives Down Employee Turnover at Advnace Auto Parts (Page 56) TM - November 2007 - Application: Pre-Hire Testing Drives Down Employee Turnover at Advnace Auto Parts (Page 57) TM - November 2007 - Dashboard: The Role of Learning Business Process Outsourcing (Page 58) TM - November 2007 - Dashboard: The Role of Learning Business Process Outsourcing (Page 59) TM - November 2007 - Dashboard: The Role of Learning Business Process Outsourcing (Page 60) TM - November 2007 - Dashboard: The Role of Learning Business Process Outsourcing (Page 61) TM - November 2007 - Insight: Nationwide Insurance: On Employees' Side (Page 62) TM - November 2007 - Insight: Nationwide Insurance: On Employees' Side (Page 63) TM - November 2007 - Insight: Nationwide Insurance: On Employees' Side (Page 64) TM - November 2007 - Editorial Resources (Page 65) TM - November 2007 - Full Potential (Page 66) TM - November 2007 - Full Potential (Page Cover3) TM - November 2007 - Full Potential (Page Cover4)
For optimal viewing of this digital publication, please enable JavaScript and then refresh the page. If you would like to try to load the digital publication without using Flash Player detection, please click here.