Talent Management - December 2008 - (Page 35) organizational compliance requirements. Here’s a look at a few such innovations: Innovation 1: Managing Change While it makes little sense to retrain every single employee every time a regulation is released or an old one is updated, that’s exactly what companies have traditionally done. Older LMSs typically offered no automated means to determine which individuals needed to be trained based on whether their job tasks were impacted by a regulatory change. Now, revision management LMS functionality makes that possible. Whenever a regulation is introduced or changed, LMSs can automatically cascade all changes through the system; incorporate information and training assignments tied to the change into development plans for every employee impacted; and monitor employee records to determine whether system-assigned tasks have been completed. Innovation 2: Meeting the Burden of Proof Companies that conduct business in regulated environments understand the importance of documentation. Talent managers can train people and take as many steps as possible to ensure they meet all of the industry’s regulatory requirements. However, unless they can demonstrate via tangible reports and auditable tracking that they’ve complied with the rules, most regulators will not give credit for meeting regulatory guidelines. Further, accuracy, security and validity of trainingand compliance-related data stored in a company’s LMS are critical to compliance-related record keeping. Unfortunately, compliance with many federal regulations historically required companies to maintain strict procedural and security controls over LMS electronic records. Because of this limitation, many organizations operating under regulators’ close scrutiny continued to use manual, paper-based processes to track and store compliance-related data well into the digital age. Thanks to another recent LMS innovation, companies operating in heavily regulated industries now have the option to implement a bulletproof, paperless recordkeeping system. One way LMSs now protect electronic, compliance-related records and prevent unauthorized access to data is through the use of electronic signatures that typically consist of a unique user name and password combination. These signatures can be used to protect information related to both learning events — including completion and attempted completion of training-related requirements or activities — and assessment events such as records of individuals’ mastery of particular skills or obtained knowledge on specific topics. A pharmaceutical manufacturing company that needs to meet Food and Drug Administration (FDA) recordkeeping requirements, for example, can use such an LMS to limit accessibility to training records by set- ting specific security permissions for entering, deleting and modifying training history. These records can be safeguarded further by implementing several layers of authentication and other controls designed to maintain the uniqueness and integrity of each user name and password combination. Now LMSs also are capable of safeguarding compliancerelated data through audit-trail functionality that allows any action impacting compliance data to be tracked and recorded. For example, when anyone uses his or her user name and password to log in to the system and modify a record, these modifications can be automatically logged in a detailed event transaction history table. This table records the user’s name and the date and time of the transaction. It also includes a column that indicates the nature of the change — for example, whether a creation, modification or deletion occurred — and a snapshot of the data prior to the change. These controls mean auditors perusing the system can view all learning and assessment events, as well as historical records that depict how data has been changed and by whom. Innovation 3: Integration With Critical Business Processes As LMS systems have evolved, they have been integrated with other critical business processes to ensure critical compliance rules are enforced. This integration has emerged as a safeguard for organizations and employees alike. If an employee has not met specific compliance requirements, the LMS will automatically send a message to another system, telling it to deactivate the employee’s badge, key or credentials that give that employee access to the equipment or processes impacted by noncompliance. For example, a pharmaceutical industry employee who has not completed the necessary training required to operate a specific drug dispensing machine cannot use his credentials to access and operate that machine until required training is completed. Similarly, crane operators who have not completed mandated safety training for operating that piece of equipment, or whose credentials have expired, will not be able to operate that equipment. In the airline industry, maintenance workers who have not completed mandatory compliance training may be denied access to equipment or workstations required to perform maintenance. Taken together, these three innovations not only provide talent managers with a virtually foolproof system to seamlessly manage critically important training data, they also provide companies with the necessary safeguards their customers and regulators demand while also protecting their bottom lines. December 2008 Ed Cohen is chief technology officer at Plateau Systems, a talent management solutions provider. He can be reached at editor@talentmgt.com. talent management magazine www.talentmgt.com 35 http://www.talentmgt.com
Table of Contents Feed for the Digital Edition of Talent Management - December 2008 Talent Management - December 2008 Editor's Letter Contents Human Performance Leading Edge Foundations Recruitment & Retention Assessment & Evaluation Compensation & Benefits Performance Management Learning & Development Succession Planning Insight Dashboard Application Advertiser's Index Editorial Resources Full Potential Talent Management - December 2008 Talent Management - December 2008 - (Page Intro) Talent Management - December 2008 - Talent Management - December 2008 (Page Cover1) Talent Management - December 2008 - Talent Management - December 2008 (Page Cover2) Talent Management - December 2008 - Talent Management - December 2008 (Page 3) Talent Management - December 2008 - Editor's Letter (Page 4) Talent Management - December 2008 - Editor's Letter (Page 5) Talent Management - December 2008 - Editor's Letter (Page 6) Talent Management - December 2008 - Editor's Letter (Page 7) Talent Management - December 2008 - Contents (Page 8) Talent Management - December 2008 - Contents (Page 9) Talent Management - December 2008 - Human Performance (Page 10) Talent Management - December 2008 - Human Performance (Page 11) Talent Management - December 2008 - Leading Edge (Page 12) Talent Management - December 2008 - Leading Edge (Page 13) Talent Management - December 2008 - Foundations (Page 14) Talent Management - December 2008 - Foundations (Page 15) Talent Management - December 2008 - Recruitment & Retention (Page 16) Talent Management - December 2008 - Recruitment & Retention (Page 17) Talent Management - December 2008 - Recruitment & Retention (Page 18) Talent Management - December 2008 - Recruitment & Retention (Page 19) Talent Management - December 2008 - Assessment & Evaluation (Page 20) Talent Management - December 2008 - Assessment & Evaluation (Page 21) Talent Management - December 2008 - Assessment & Evaluation (Page 22) Talent Management - December 2008 - Assessment & Evaluation (Page 23) Talent Management - December 2008 - Compensation & Benefits (Page 24) Talent Management - December 2008 - Compensation & Benefits (Page 25) Talent Management - December 2008 - Compensation & Benefits (Page 26) Talent Management - December 2008 - Compensation & Benefits (Page 27) Talent Management - December 2008 - Compensation & Benefits (Page 28) Talent Management - December 2008 - Compensation & Benefits (Page 29) Talent Management - December 2008 - Performance Management (Page 30) Talent Management - December 2008 - Performance Management (Page 31) Talent Management - December 2008 - Performance Management (Page 32) Talent Management - December 2008 - Performance Management (Page 33) Talent Management - December 2008 - Learning & Development (Page 34) Talent Management - December 2008 - Learning & Development (Page 35) Talent Management - December 2008 - Succession Planning (Page 36) Talent Management - December 2008 - Succession Planning (Page 37) Talent Management - December 2008 - Succession Planning (Page 38) Talent Management - December 2008 - Succession Planning (Page 39) Talent Management - December 2008 - Succession Planning (Page 40) Talent Management - December 2008 - Succession Planning (Page 41) Talent Management - December 2008 - Succession Planning (Page 42) Talent Management - December 2008 - Succession Planning (Page 43) Talent Management - December 2008 - Succession Planning (Page 44) Talent Management - December 2008 - Succession Planning (Page 45) Talent Management - December 2008 - Succession Planning (Page 46) Talent Management - December 2008 - Succession Planning (Page 47) Talent Management - December 2008 - Insight (Page 48) Talent Management - December 2008 - Insight (Page 49) Talent Management - December 2008 - Dashboard (Page 50) Talent Management - December 2008 - Dashboard (Page 51) Talent Management - December 2008 - Dashboard (Page 52) Talent Management - December 2008 - Dashboard (Page 53) Talent Management - December 2008 - Application (Page 54) Talent Management - December 2008 - Application (Page 55) Talent Management - December 2008 - Application (Page 56) Talent Management - December 2008 - Editorial Resources (Page 57) Talent Management - December 2008 - Full Potential (Page 58) Talent Management - December 2008 - Full Potential (Page Cover3) Talent Management - December 2008 - Full Potential (Page Cover4)
For optimal viewing of this digital publication, please enable JavaScript and then refresh the page. If you would like to try to load the digital publication without using Flash Player detection, please click here.