Talent Management - December 2008 - (Page 39) How to Tell a High Potential ‘You’re the One’ Lindsay Edmonds Wickman If an organization decides to tell top performers they are high potential, it’s important talent leaders are well-versed in how to conduct that conversation. If mishandled, it could have negative effects on the organization. “You just have to sit down with the individual and say, ‘We, the leadership team, [have] done a review of our top leadership across the organization, and we feel based on a number of factors that you could have the ability to take on a more senior position,’” said Ken Driscoll, the director of the talent management group at Navistar Inc., an international truck and engine corporation. “You have to make sure you’re very clear that this is our [organization’s] view at this point in time, and it could change depending upon your performance.” Lynne Morton, co-founder and chief operating officer at TalentScope, said this tactic can help avoid an implied promise that can result from a mismanaged meeting. She said managers also should walk into the conversation armed with information and data. “The best conversations are conversations that are informed,” Morton said. “If I can show you data, it makes sense to you. It’s not something that falls out of the sky in a vacuum. Otherwise, if I have a conversation with you that is a surprise, you might not understand why you’ve been earmarked, and you’d only rely on your own expectations.” It’s also critical that organizations give talent managers conducting these conversations the tools to be successful, Driscoll said. “I believe if we were to go in [this] direction, it would have to be in line with our cultural values and how we treat people at the very basic,” he said. “And it would give managers talking points to help them through what could be an interesting conversation, broad guidelines [and] also help leadership understand why it’s important.” Some organizations tell high potentials the whole story and others don’t. At integrated health care delivery organization Central Maine Medical Family, managers chosen for the Accelerated Development Group are not told they are being groomed for a specific position. “In a smaller organization like ours, it’s very important to develop people not only for a new title, but rather for a change in scope of service, a change in management of particular divisions or departments, [and] development of more generic leadership skills that could be transferred department to department,” said Joyce McPhetres, the vice president of HR and organizational development. “Our Accelerated Development Group is basically told that we see them as leaders of our future, and our goal in this program [is] to develop them more fully: their skills, their leadership and their opportunities with an unspecified commitment to a title.” But that doesn’t mean an organization shouldn’t tell high potentials they are being groomed for specific positions if the leaders are committed to the decision. “If there are people within your organization that are heir apparent to particular positions, I think it’s absolutely critical to talk with them about that, to commit — if the organization is willing — to their development for that future position and to garner their level of interest,” McPhetres said. talent management magazine www.talentmgt.com 39 http://www.talentmgt.com
Table of Contents Feed for the Digital Edition of Talent Management - December 2008 Talent Management - December 2008 Editor's Letter Contents Human Performance Leading Edge Foundations Recruitment & Retention Assessment & Evaluation Compensation & Benefits Performance Management Learning & Development Succession Planning Insight Dashboard Application Advertiser's Index Editorial Resources Full Potential Talent Management - December 2008 Talent Management - December 2008 - (Page Intro) Talent Management - December 2008 - Talent Management - December 2008 (Page Cover1) Talent Management - December 2008 - Talent Management - December 2008 (Page Cover2) Talent Management - December 2008 - Talent Management - December 2008 (Page 3) Talent Management - December 2008 - Editor's Letter (Page 4) Talent Management - December 2008 - Editor's Letter (Page 5) Talent Management - December 2008 - Editor's Letter (Page 6) Talent Management - December 2008 - Editor's Letter (Page 7) Talent Management - December 2008 - Contents (Page 8) Talent Management - December 2008 - Contents (Page 9) Talent Management - December 2008 - Human Performance (Page 10) Talent Management - December 2008 - Human Performance (Page 11) Talent Management - December 2008 - Leading Edge (Page 12) Talent Management - December 2008 - Leading Edge (Page 13) Talent Management - December 2008 - Foundations (Page 14) Talent Management - December 2008 - Foundations (Page 15) Talent Management - December 2008 - Recruitment & Retention (Page 16) Talent Management - December 2008 - Recruitment & Retention (Page 17) Talent Management - December 2008 - Recruitment & Retention (Page 18) Talent Management - December 2008 - Recruitment & Retention (Page 19) Talent Management - December 2008 - Assessment & Evaluation (Page 20) Talent Management - December 2008 - Assessment & Evaluation (Page 21) Talent Management - December 2008 - Assessment & Evaluation (Page 22) Talent Management - December 2008 - Assessment & Evaluation (Page 23) Talent Management - December 2008 - Compensation & Benefits (Page 24) Talent Management - December 2008 - Compensation & Benefits (Page 25) Talent Management - December 2008 - Compensation & Benefits (Page 26) Talent Management - December 2008 - Compensation & Benefits (Page 27) Talent Management - December 2008 - Compensation & Benefits (Page 28) Talent Management - December 2008 - Compensation & Benefits (Page 29) Talent Management - December 2008 - Performance Management (Page 30) Talent Management - December 2008 - Performance Management (Page 31) Talent Management - December 2008 - Performance Management (Page 32) Talent Management - December 2008 - Performance Management (Page 33) Talent Management - December 2008 - Learning & Development (Page 34) Talent Management - December 2008 - Learning & Development (Page 35) Talent Management - December 2008 - Succession Planning (Page 36) Talent Management - December 2008 - Succession Planning (Page 37) Talent Management - December 2008 - Succession Planning (Page 38) Talent Management - December 2008 - Succession Planning (Page 39) Talent Management - December 2008 - Succession Planning (Page 40) Talent Management - December 2008 - Succession Planning (Page 41) Talent Management - December 2008 - Succession Planning (Page 42) Talent Management - December 2008 - Succession Planning (Page 43) Talent Management - December 2008 - Succession Planning (Page 44) Talent Management - December 2008 - Succession Planning (Page 45) Talent Management - December 2008 - Succession Planning (Page 46) Talent Management - December 2008 - Succession Planning (Page 47) Talent Management - December 2008 - Insight (Page 48) Talent Management - December 2008 - Insight (Page 49) Talent Management - December 2008 - Dashboard (Page 50) Talent Management - December 2008 - Dashboard (Page 51) Talent Management - December 2008 - Dashboard (Page 52) Talent Management - December 2008 - Dashboard (Page 53) Talent Management - December 2008 - Application (Page 54) Talent Management - December 2008 - Application (Page 55) Talent Management - December 2008 - Application (Page 56) Talent Management - December 2008 - Editorial Resources (Page 57) Talent Management - December 2008 - Full Potential (Page 58) Talent Management - December 2008 - Full Potential (Page Cover3) Talent Management - December 2008 - Full Potential (Page Cover4)
For optimal viewing of this digital publication, please enable JavaScript and then refresh the page. If you would like to try to load the digital publication without using Flash Player detection, please click here.