Managed Care - May 2008 - (Page 8) VIEWPOINT Health Care IT Lessons From North of the 49th Parallel We Yanks might learn a thing or two about making decisive, countrywide health care decisions from our Canadian neighbors By Lorraine Fernandes, RHIA, RHIT W e in the United States are facing a crisis with the inequality and high cost of our health care services. We have a fragmented health care delivery system that functions with discrete silos of data. Creating a cohesive health care system is exactly what we need to meet the common objective of delivering high-quality, costeffective, and timely patient care. Luckily, we have a model to follow directly to our north: Canada. There, the 14 federal, provincial, and territorial deputy ministers of health — as well as regional health care authorities and other health care organizations and information technology vendors and suppliers — are working together to provide 50 percent of Canadians with access to a secure electronic health record (EHR) by 2010. How does a country with more than 33 million people come to an agreement and move forward with a countrywide health care IT system? Easy: In Canada, the health care IT infrastructure functions like a business unit. To move forward with EHR adoption, this representative group did research, made a decision, secured funding, and began implementation. not-for-profit organization that invests with public partners across Canada to implement and reuse compatible health information systems architecture, is spearheading the initiative. One of the first steps in implementing this nationwide project, and one of the most pivotal aspects of its success, was to create a common blueprint — an electronic health record infostructure. This blueprint includes: • Client registry systems, similar to enterprise master-person indexes and record locator services that commonly support regional health information organizations (RHIOs) in the United States. A master person index is a software application that identifies persons in an integrated delivery network across different registration, scheduling, financial, and clinical systems. • A longitudinal record service, to coordinate data across multiple domains and registries • Standardized common services and communication services to sustain privacy, security, and overall interoperability • Standardized information and message structures to support ease of implementation and interoperability and data sharing within and across provinces. In this model, each infostructure, which may include client or provider registries, data warehouses, and diagnostic and clinical applications, operate with other infostructures in a peer-to-peer manner through the Health Churning costs money Here in the United States we don’t make decisions nearly this quickly. We’ve been churning over patient identification, for example, for more than a decade. Churning costs money; churning costs development time and effectiveness; ultimately, churning costs lives. Let’s take a lesson from our northern neighbors and get the job done. Canada Health Infoway, an independent 8 MANAGED CARE / MAY 2008
For optimal viewing of this digital publication, please enable JavaScript and then refresh the page. If you would like to try to load the digital publication without using Flash Player detection, please click here.