Managed Care - June 2008 - (Page 21) MEDICATION MANAGEMENT Statins Continue to Be Ubiquitous, But Increasingly Controversial Recent reports question whether statins are being overprescribed By Martin Sipkoff tatins are the best-selling drugs in the world, with more than 25 million people, including 13 million Americans, spending $27.8 billion on the cholesterol drugs in 2006, according to IMS Health. About half of that was for Pfizer’s Lipitor, which last year had $18.4 billion in sales in the United States alone. But recent events have invigorated a longrunning controversy about value of the blockbuster drug, questioning whether it is overprescribed and inappropriately advertised. The drugs are manufactured by several large pharmacy companies in addition to Pfizer, the leaders being Merck’s Mevacor and Zocor, AstraZeneca’s Crestor, and Bristol-Myers Squibb’s Pravachol. “There is no question that for people who know they have coronary disease, statins have a significant beneficial impact,” says Howard Brody, MD, professor of family medicine at the University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston. “But now it is being prescribed for a much broader range of patients, bringing into question the cost of treatment versus benefit.” Statin proponents are vocal in support of the use of the drug as a prophylaxis. “The efficacy and effectiveness of statins has been established by decades of research,” says David Nash, MD, chairman of the Department of Health Policy at Jefferson Medical College of Thomas Jefferson University in Philadelphia. “Controversy over use of the drug is somewhat perplexing in that there is plenty of evidence that the science is solid.” Nash is certainly correct in that the effectiveness of statins in reducing cholesterol is well established. The government’s National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) guidelines say that as many as 40 million Americans should S Controversy arises when statins are used “as a prophylaxis,” says Howard Brody, MD, professor of medicine at the University of Texas. be taking statins to fight heart disease, especially patients with diabetes or a family history of heart disease. But recent research questions the so-called “lipid hypothesis” of the causality of cardiovascular diseases (CVD). Dyslipidemia is defined as elevated blood cholesterol, elevated concentrations of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), or abnormal proportions of LDL-C and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C). For decades, dyslipidemia has been identified as a causal factor in atherosclerosis and other CVDs. In the past 50 years, dozens of studies have led most medical scientists and clinicians to accept the lipid hypothesis, and the primary focus of CVD health care guidelines has been to lower LDL- C. A small, vocal group of clinicians says, however, that there has been significant bias in the studies and that the hypothesis has never been truly substantiated. They say that it is also well-established that other medical conditions can contribute to causing CVD. Overuse of statins It is the supposed overuse of statins to lower LDL-C that is generating much of the current cholesterol controversy, however. In January two manufacturers, Merck and ScheringPlough, reported results of a trial of the effectiveness of the combination of two cholesterol drugs — Merck’s statin Zocor (simvastatin) and Schering-Plough’s Zetia (ezetimibe, an antihyperlipidemic drug but not a statin), marketed as single-dose Vytorin. The combination drug was found to lower cholesterol better than the statin alone, but this demonstrated no enhanced heath benefit. In other words, combining the drugs did not reduce heart attacks or strokes better than statins alone. The results were a financial blow to the companies, which had seen sales of Vytorin grow as- Contributing Editor Martin Sipkoff is a long-time health care journalist. JUNE 2008 / MANAGED CARE 21
Table of Contents Feed for the Digital Edition of Managed Care - June 2008 Managed Care - June 2008 Editor’s Memo Contents Viewpoint Letters News and Commentary Legislation & Regulation Medication Management Compensation Monitor Plans Chart Course in Rough Waters A Conversation With Barbara Starfield, MD Smoke Signals from Payers Slow Going for Clinical Decision Support Back Pain and Physical Therapy Formulary Files PlanWatch Outlook Managed Care - June 2008 Managed Care - June 2008 - Managed Care - June 2008 (Page Cover1) Managed Care - June 2008 - Managed Care - June 2008 (Page Cover2) Managed Care - June 2008 - Managed Care - June 2008 (Page Cover3) Managed Care - June 2008 - Managed Care - June 2008 (Page Cover4) Managed Care - June 2008 - Managed Care - June 2008 (Page A) Managed Care - June 2008 - Managed Care - June 2008 (Page B) Managed Care - June 2008 - Editor’s Memo (Page 1) Managed Care - June 2008 - Contents (Page 2) Managed Care - June 2008 - Contents (Page 3) Managed Care - June 2008 - Contents (Page 4) Managed Care - June 2008 - Viewpoint (Page 5) Managed Care - June 2008 - Letters (Page 6) Managed Care - June 2008 - Letters (Page 7) Managed Care - June 2008 - Letters (Page 8) Managed Care - June 2008 - Letters (Page 9) Managed Care - June 2008 - Letters (Page 10) Managed Care - June 2008 - Letters (Page 11) Managed Care - June 2008 - Letters (Page 12) Managed Care - June 2008 - Letters (Page 13) Managed Care - June 2008 - News and Commentary (Page 14) Managed Care - June 2008 - News and Commentary (Page 15) Managed Care - June 2008 - News and Commentary (Page 16) Managed Care - June 2008 - News and Commentary (Page 17) Managed Care - June 2008 - News and Commentary (Page 18) Managed Care - June 2008 - Legislation & Regulation (Page 19) Managed Care - June 2008 - Legislation & Regulation (Page 20) Managed Care - June 2008 - Medication Management (Page 21) Managed Care - June 2008 - Medication Management (Page 22) Managed Care - June 2008 - Compensation Monitor (Page 23) Managed Care - June 2008 - Plans Chart Course in Rough Waters (Page 24) Managed Care - June 2008 - Plans Chart Course in Rough Waters (Page 25) Managed Care - June 2008 - Plans Chart Course in Rough Waters (Page 26) Managed Care - June 2008 - Plans Chart Course in Rough Waters (Page 27) Managed Care - June 2008 - Plans Chart Course in Rough Waters (Page 28) Managed Care - June 2008 - Plans Chart Course in Rough Waters (Page 29) Managed Care - June 2008 - Plans Chart Course in Rough Waters (Page 30) Managed Care - June 2008 - Plans Chart Course in Rough Waters (Page 31) Managed Care - June 2008 - Plans Chart Course in Rough Waters (Page 32) Managed Care - June 2008 - A Conversation With Barbara Starfield, MD (Page 33) Managed Care - June 2008 - A Conversation With Barbara Starfield, MD (Page 34) Managed Care - June 2008 - A Conversation With Barbara Starfield, MD (Page 35) Managed Care - June 2008 - A Conversation With Barbara Starfield, MD (Page 36) Managed Care - June 2008 - A Conversation With Barbara Starfield, MD (Page 37) Managed Care - June 2008 - A Conversation With Barbara Starfield, MD (Page 38) Managed Care - June 2008 - A Conversation With Barbara Starfield, MD (Page 39) Managed Care - June 2008 - Smoke Signals from Payers (Page 40) Managed Care - June 2008 - Smoke Signals from Payers (Page 41) Managed Care - June 2008 - Smoke Signals from Payers (Page 42) Managed Care - June 2008 - Smoke Signals from Payers (Page 43) Managed Care - June 2008 - Slow Going for Clinical Decision Support (Page 44) Managed Care - June 2008 - Slow Going for Clinical Decision Support (Page 45) Managed Care - June 2008 - Slow Going for Clinical Decision Support (Page 46) Managed Care - June 2008 - Back Pain and Physical Therapy (Page 47) Managed Care - June 2008 - Back Pain and Physical Therapy (Page 48) Managed Care - June 2008 - Back Pain and Physical Therapy (Page 49) Managed Care - June 2008 - Formulary Files (Page 50) Managed Care - June 2008 - PlanWatch (Page 51) Managed Care - June 2008 - PlanWatch (Page 52) Managed Care - June 2008 - Outlook (Page 53) Managed Care - June 2008 - Outlook (Page 54)
For optimal viewing of this digital publication, please enable JavaScript and then refresh the page. If you would like to try to load the digital publication without using Flash Player detection, please click here.