Pharmacy & Therapeutics - September 2008 - (Page CB12) 8.5 Geriatric Use Prevention of DVT in hip, knee and abdominal surgery; Treatment of DVT, Prevention of ischemic complications of unstable angina and non-Q-Wave myocardial infarction Over 2800 patients, 65 years and older, have received Lovenox in pivotal clinical trials. The efficacy of Lovenox in the geriatric (≥65 years) was similar to that seen in younger patients (<65 years). The incidence of bleeding complications was similar between geriatric and younger patients when 30 mg every 12 hours or 40 mg once a day doses of Lovenox were employed. The incidence of bleeding complications was higher in geriatric patients as compared to younger patients when Lovenox was administered at doses of 1.5 mg/kg once a day or 1 mg/kg every 12 hours. The risk of Lovenox-associated bleeding increased with age. Serious adverse events increased with age for patients receiving Lovenox. Other clinical experience (including postmarketing surveillance and literature reports) has not revealed additional differences in the safety of Lovenox between geriatric and younger patients. Careful attention to dosing intervals and concomitant medications (especially antiplatelet medications) is advised. Lovenox should be used with care in geriatric patients who may show delayed elimination of enoxaparin. Monitoring of geriatric patients with low body weight (<45 kg) and those predisposed to decreased renal function should be considered [see Warnings and Precautions (5.9) and Clinical Pharmacology (12.3)]. Treatment of acute ST-segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI) In the clinical study for treatment of acute STEMI, there was no evidence of difference in efficacy between patients ≥75 years of age (n = 1241) and patients less than 75 years of age (n=9015). Patients ≥75 years of age did not receive a 30-mg IV bolus prior to the normal dosage regimen and had their SC dose adjusted to 0.75 mg/kg every 12 hours [see Dosage and Administration (2.3)]. The incidence of bleeding complications was higher in patients ≥65 years of age as compared to younger patients (<65 years). 8.6 Patients with Mechanical Prosthetic Heart Valves The use of Lovenox has not been adequately studied for thromboprophylaxis in patients with mechanical prosthetic heart valves and has not been adequately studied for longterm use in this patient population. Isolated cases of prosthetic heart valve thrombosis have been reported in patients with mechanical prosthetic heart valves who have received enoxaparin for thromboprophylaxis. Some of these cases were pregnant women in whom thrombosis led to maternal and fetal deaths. Insufficient data, the underlying disease and the possibility of inadequate anticoagulation complicate the evaluation of these cases. Pregnant women with mechanical prosthetic heart valves may be at higher risk for thromboembolism [see Warnings and Precautions (5.7)]. 8.7 Renal Impairment In patients with renal impairment, there is an increase in exposure of enoxaparin sodium. All such patients should be observed carefully for signs and symptoms of bleeding. Because exposure of enoxaparin sodium is significantly increased in patients with severe renal impairment (creatinine clearance <30 mL/min), a dosage adjustment is recommended for therapeutic and prophylactic dosage ranges. No dosage adjustment is recommended in patients with moderate (creatinine clearance 30-50 mL/min) and mild (creatinine clearance 50-80 mL/min) renal impairment [see Dosage and Administration (2.2) and Clinical Pharmacology (12.3)]. 8.8 Hepatic Impairment The impact of hepatic impairment on enoxaparin’s exposure and antithrombotic effect has not been investigated. Caution should be exercised when administering enoxaparin to patients with hepatic impairment. 8.9 Low-Weight Patients An increase in exposure of enoxaparin sodium with prophylactic dosages (non-weight adjusted) has been observed in low-weight women (<45 kg) and low-weight men (<57 kg). All such patients should be observed carefully for signs and symptoms of bleeding [see Clinical Pharmacology (12.3)]. 10 OVERDOSAGE Accidental overdosage following administration of Lovenox may lead to hemorrhagic complications. Injected Lovenox may be largely neutralized by the slow IV injection of protamine sulfate (1% solution). The dose of protamine sulfate should be equal to the dose of Lovenox injected: 1 mg protamine sulfate should be administered to neutralize 1 mg Lovenox, if enoxaparin sodium was administered in the previous 8 hours. An infusion of 0.5 mg protamine per 1 mg of enoxaparin sodium may be administered if enoxaparin sodium was administered greater than 8 hours previous to the protamine administration, or if it has been determined that a second dose of protamine is required. The second infusion of 0.5 mg protamine sulfate per 1 mg of Lovenox may be administered if the aPTT measured 2 to 4 hours after the first infusion remains prolonged. If at least 12 hours have elapsed since the last enoxaparin sodium injection, protamine administration may not be required; however, even with higher doses of protamine, the aPTT may remain more prolonged than following administration of heparin. In all cases, the anti-Factor Xa activity is never completely neutralized (maximum about 60%). Particular care should be taken to avoid overdosage with protamine sulfate. Administration of protamine sulfate can cause severe hypotensive and anaphylactoid reactions. Because fatal reactions, often resembling anaphylaxis, have been reported with protamine sulfate, it should be given only when resuscitation techniques and treatment of anaphylactic shock are readily available. For additional information consult the labeling of protamine sulfate injection products. 11 DESCRIPTION Lovenox is a sterile aqueous solution containing enoxaparin sodium, a low molecular weight heparin. The pH of the injection is 5.5 to 7.5. Enoxaparin sodium is obtained by alkaline depolymerization of heparin benzyl ester derived from porcine intestinal mucosa. Its structure is characterized by a 2-O-sulfo-4enepyranosuronic acid group at the non-reducing end and a 2-N,6-O-disulfo-Dglucosamine at the reducing end of the chain. About 20% (ranging between 15% and 25%) of the enoxaparin structure contains an 1,6 anhydro derivative on the reducing end of the polysaccharide chain. The drug substance is the sodium salt. The average molecular weight is about 4500 daltons. The molecular weight distribution is: 8000 daltons STRUCTURAL FORMULA ≤20% ≥68% ≤18% Lovenox 100 mg/mL Concentration contains 10 mg enoxaparin sodium (approximate anti-Factor Xa activity of 1000 IU [with reference to the W.H.O. First International Low Molecular Weight Heparin Reference Standard]) per 0.1 mL Water for Injection. Lovenox 150 mg/mL Concentration contains 15 mg enoxaparin sodium (approximate anti-Factor Xa activity of 1500 IU [with reference to the W.H.O. First International Low Molecular Weight Heparin Reference Standard]) per 0.1 mL Water for Injection. The Lovenox prefilled syringes and graduated prefilled syringes are preservative-free and intended for use only as a single-dose injection. The multiple-dose vial contains 15 mg benzyl alcohol per 1 mL as a preservative. [See Dosage and Administration (2) and How Supplied (16) for dosage unit descriptions]. 12 CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY 12.1 Mechanism of Action Enoxaparin is a low molecular weight heparin which has antithrombotic properties. 12.2 Pharmacodynamics In humans, enoxaparin given at a dose of 1.5 mg/kg subcutaneously (SC) is characterized by a higher ratio of anti-Factor Xa to anti-Factor IIa activity (mean ± SD, 14.0 ± 3.1) (based on areas under anti-Factor activity versus time curves) compared to the ratios observed for heparin (mean±SD, 1.22 ± 0.13). Increases of up to 1.8 times the control values were seen in the thrombin time (TT) and the activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT). Enoxaparin at a 1 mg/kg dose (100 mg / mL concentration), administered SC every 12 hours to patients in a large clinical trial resulted in aPTT values of 45 seconds or less in the majority of patients (n = 1607). A 30-mg IV bolus immediately followed by a 1 mg/kg SC administration resulted in aPTT post-injection values of 50 seconds. The average aPTT prolongation value on Day 1 was about 16% higher than on Day 4. 12.3 Pharmacokinetics Absorption. Pharmacokinetic trials were conducted using the 100 mg/ml formulation. Maximum anti-Factor Xa and anti-thrombin (anti-Factor IIa) activities occur 3 to 5 hours after SC injection of enoxaparin. Mean peak anti-Factor Xa activity was 0.16 IU/mL (1.58 μg/mL) and 0.38 IU/mL (3.83μg/mL) after the 20 mg and the 40 mg clinically tested SC doses, respectively. Mean (n = 46) peak anti-Factor Xa activity was 1.1 IU/mL at steady state in patients with unstable angina receiving 1 mg/kg SC every 12 hours for 14 days. Mean absolute bioavailability of enoxaparin, after 1.5 mg/kg given SC, based on antiFactor Xa activity is approximately 100% in healthy subjects. A 30-mg IV bolus immediately followed by a 1 mg/kg SC every 12 hours provided initial peak anti-Factor Xa levels of 1.16 IU/mL (n=16) and average exposure corresponding to 84% of steady-state levels. Steady state is achieved on the second day of treatment. Enoxaparin pharmacokinetics appear to be linear over the recommended dosage ranges [see Dosage and Administration (2)]. After repeated subcutaneous administration of 40 mg once daily and 1.5 mg/kg once-daily regimens in healthy volunteers, the steady state is reached on day 2 with an average exposure ratio about 15% higher than after a single dose. Steady-state enoxaparin activity levels are well predicted by single-dose pharmacokinetics. After repeated subcutaneous administration of the 1 mg/kg twice daily regimen, the steady state is reached from day 4 with mean exposure about 65% higher than after a single dose and mean peak and trough levels of about 1.2 and 0.52 IU/mL, respectively. Based on enoxa
Table of Contents Feed for the Digital Edition of Pharmacy & Therapeutics - September 2008 Pharmacy & Therapeutics - September 2008 Contents Editorial Medication Errors Prescription: Washington New Drugs/Drug News/New Medical Devices Drug Forecast Effect of Prescription Copays on Adherence and Treatment Failure with Oral Antidiabetic Medications Vaccine Declinations Present New Challenges for Public Health Universal Health Care in America Digestive Disease Week and American Diabetes Association Pharmaceutical Approval Update Pharmacy & Therapeutics - September 2008 Pharmacy & Therapeutics - September 2008 - Pharmacy & Therapeutics - September 2008 (Page Cover1) Pharmacy & Therapeutics - September 2008 - Pharmacy & Therapeutics - September 2008 (Page Welcome) Pharmacy & Therapeutics - September 2008 - Pharmacy & Therapeutics - September 2008 (Page 493) Pharmacy & Therapeutics - September 2008 - Pharmacy & Therapeutics - September 2008 (Page 494) Pharmacy & Therapeutics - September 2008 - Pharmacy & Therapeutics - September 2008 (Page 495) Pharmacy & Therapeutics - September 2008 - Pharmacy & Therapeutics - September 2008 (Page 496) Pharmacy & Therapeutics - September 2008 - Pharmacy & Therapeutics - September 2008 (Page 497) Pharmacy & Therapeutics - September 2008 - Contents (Page 498) Pharmacy & Therapeutics - September 2008 - Contents (Page 499) Pharmacy & Therapeutics - September 2008 - Contents (Page 500) Pharmacy & Therapeutics - September 2008 - Contents (Page 501) Pharmacy & Therapeutics - September 2008 - Contents (Page 502) Pharmacy & Therapeutics - September 2008 - Editorial (Page 503) Pharmacy & Therapeutics - September 2008 - Medication Errors (Page 504) Pharmacy & Therapeutics - September 2008 - Medication Errors (Page 505) Pharmacy & Therapeutics - September 2008 - Medication Errors (Page 506) Pharmacy & Therapeutics - September 2008 - Medication Errors (Page 507) Pharmacy & Therapeutics - September 2008 - Medication Errors (Page 508) Pharmacy & Therapeutics - September 2008 - Medication Errors (Page 509) Pharmacy & Therapeutics - September 2008 - Medication Errors (Page 510) Pharmacy & Therapeutics - September 2008 - Prescription: Washington (Page 511) Pharmacy & Therapeutics - September 2008 - Prescription: Washington (Page 512) Pharmacy & Therapeutics - September 2008 - New Drugs/Drug News/New Medical Devices (Page 513) Pharmacy & Therapeutics - September 2008 - New Drugs/Drug News/New Medical Devices (Page 514) Pharmacy & Therapeutics - September 2008 - New Drugs/Drug News/New Medical Devices (Page 515) Pharmacy & Therapeutics - September 2008 - New Drugs/Drug News/New Medical Devices (Page 516) Pharmacy & Therapeutics - September 2008 - New Drugs/Drug News/New Medical Devices (Page 517) Pharmacy & Therapeutics - September 2008 - New Drugs/Drug News/New Medical Devices (Page 518) Pharmacy & Therapeutics - September 2008 - New Drugs/Drug News/New Medical Devices (Page 519) Pharmacy & Therapeutics - September 2008 - New Drugs/Drug News/New Medical Devices (Page 520) Pharmacy & Therapeutics - September 2008 - New Drugs/Drug News/New Medical Devices (Page 521) Pharmacy & Therapeutics - September 2008 - New Drugs/Drug News/New Medical Devices (Page 522) Pharmacy & Therapeutics - September 2008 - Drug Forecast (Page 523) Pharmacy & Therapeutics - September 2008 - Drug Forecast (Page 524) Pharmacy & Therapeutics - September 2008 - Drug Forecast (Page 525) Pharmacy & Therapeutics - September 2008 - Drug Forecast (Page 526) Pharmacy & Therapeutics - September 2008 - Drug Forecast (Page 527) Pharmacy & Therapeutics - September 2008 - Drug Forecast (Page 528) Pharmacy & Therapeutics - September 2008 - Drug Forecast (Page 529) Pharmacy & Therapeutics - September 2008 - Drug Forecast (Page 530) Pharmacy & Therapeutics - September 2008 - Drug Forecast (Page 531) Pharmacy & Therapeutics - September 2008 - Effect of Prescription Copays on Adherence and Treatment Failure with Oral Antidiabetic Medications (Page 532) Pharmacy & Therapeutics - September 2008 - Effect of Prescription Copays on Adherence and Treatment Failure with Oral Antidiabetic Medications (Page 533) Pharmacy & Therapeutics - September 2008 - Effect of Prescription Copays on Adherence and Treatment Failure with Oral Antidiabetic Medications (Page 534) Pharmacy & Therapeutics - September 2008 - Effect of Prescription Copays on Adherence and Treatment Failure with Oral Antidiabetic Medications (Page 535) Pharmacy & Therapeutics - September 2008 - Effect of Prescription Copays on Adherence and Treatment Failure with Oral Antidiabetic Medications (Page 536) Pharmacy & Therapeutics - September 2008 - Effect of Prescription Copays on Adherence and Treatment Failure with Oral Antidiabetic Medications (Page 537) Pharmacy & Therapeutics - September 2008 - Effect of Prescription Copays on Adherence and Treatment Failure with Oral Antidiabetic Medications (Page 538) Pharmacy & Therapeutics - September 2008 - Effect of Prescription Copays on Adherence and Treatment Failure with Oral Antidiabetic Medications (Page 539) Pharmacy & Therapeutics - September 2008 - Effect of Prescription Copays on Adherence and Treatment Failure with Oral Antidiabetic Medications (Page 540) Pharmacy & Therapeutics - September 2008 - Effect of Prescription Copays on Adherence and Treatment Failure with Oral Antidiabetic Medications (Page 541) Pharmacy & Therapeutics - September 2008 - Vaccine Declinations Present New Challenges for Public Health (Page 542) Pharmacy & Therapeutics - September 2008 - Vaccine Declinations Present New Challenges for Public Health (Page 543) Pharmacy & Therapeutics - September 2008 - Universal Health Care in America (Page 544) Pharmacy & Therapeutics - September 2008 - Universal Health Care in America (Page 545) Pharmacy & Therapeutics - September 2008 - Digestive Disease Week and American Diabetes Association (Page 546) Pharmacy & Therapeutics - September 2008 - Digestive Disease Week and American Diabetes Association (Page 547) Pharmacy & Therapeutics - September 2008 - Digestive Disease Week and American Diabetes Association (Page 548) Pharmacy & Therapeutics - September 2008 - Digestive Disease Week and American Diabetes Association (Page 549) Pharmacy & Therapeutics - September 2008 - Pharmaceutical Approval Update (Page 550) Pharmacy & Therapeutics - September 2008 - Pharmaceutical Approval Update (Page 551) Pharmacy & Therapeutics - September 2008 - Pharmaceutical Approval Update (Page 552) Pharmacy & Therapeutics - September 2008 - Pharmaceutical Approval Update (Page 553) Pharmacy & Therapeutics - September 2008 - Pharmaceutical Approval Update (Page 554) Pharmacy & Therapeutics - September 2008 - Pharmaceutical Approval Update (Page CB1) Pharmacy & Therapeutics - September 2008 - Pharmaceutical Approval Update (Page CB2) Pharmacy & Therapeutics - September 2008 - Pharmaceutical Approval Update (Page CB3) Pharmacy & Therapeutics - September 2008 - Pharmaceutical Approval Update (Page CB4) Pharmacy & Therapeutics - September 2008 - Pharmaceutical Approval Update (Page CB5) Pharmacy & Therapeutics - September 2008 - Pharmaceutical Approval Update (Page CB6) Pharmacy & Therapeutics - September 2008 - Pharmaceutical Approval Update (Page CB7) Pharmacy & Therapeutics - September 2008 - Pharmaceutical Approval Update (Page CB8) Pharmacy & Therapeutics - September 2008 - Pharmaceutical Approval Update (Page CB9) Pharmacy & Therapeutics - September 2008 - Pharmaceutical Approval Update (Page CB10) Pharmacy & Therapeutics - September 2008 - Pharmaceutical Approval Update (Page CB11) Pharmacy & Therapeutics - September 2008 - Pharmaceutical Approval Update (Page CB12) Pharmacy & Therapeutics - September 2008 - Pharmaceutical Approval Update (Page CB13) Pharmacy & Therapeutics - September 2008 - Pharmaceutical Approval Update (Page CB14) Pharmacy & Therapeutics - September 2008 - Pharmaceutical Approval Update (Page CB15) Pharmacy & Therapeutics - September 2008 - Pharmaceutical Approval Update (Page CB16) Pharmacy & Therapeutics - September 2008 - Pharmaceutical Approval Update (Page Cover4)
For optimal viewing of this digital publication, please enable JavaScript and then refresh the page. If you would like to try to load the digital publication without using Flash Player detection, please click here.