Jetrader - July/August 2008 - (Page 29) Left. The Pratt & Whitney, 3,500HP R-4360 Wasp Major was one of the last piston-powered engines to dominate the skies before the jet and turboprop engines took its place. Right. The Wright 3,250HP R-3350 Turbo Compound engine, which was one of the most powerful radial aircraft engines of its day. a service ceiling of 33,000 feet—when an upper cylinder enclosing a passenger compartment and flight deck was added to the B50 to convert it into the Stratocruiser, it could still make 32,000 feet. (The DC7C’s ceiling was 21,700 ft and the L1649A’s, 23,700 ft.) The Wright Flyer’s engine was fabricated in the bicycle workshop by the brothers’ mechanic, Charlie Taylor, in six weeks. They had calculated, using their aerodynamic drag coefficients from their wind tunnel and the parasitic drag of the frontal area, including the pilot, that they needed at least eight horsepower to convert propeller thrust of ninety pounds to achieve the required airspeed of 23 mph. In actual fact their invention of today’s propeller gave 132 pounds of thrust with an efficiency of 75 percent. The four cylinder 175-lb engine could run for only a short time before overheating but gave out twelve horsepower, giving a weight-to-power ratio of 15:1—more than enough for the job the Flyer was designed to do on December 17, 1903. The Other Side In contrast the Langley Aerodrome—which made a vertical flight from the roof of a boathouse into the Potomac River on December 8, 1903—had a five-cylinder radial engine, weighing 208 lbs, which developed 52.4 hp (4:1 ratio). The builder was graduate mechanical engineer Charles Manley. He was also the unfortunate pilot on that short flight into the frigid water. WWI was the catalyst for the first stage of development of the radial engine: the problem was the biplanes were too slow to provide sufficient cooling air over the cylinders, so the rotary engine was adopted by both sides of the conflict for their aircraft. By 1917 they powered 80 percent of the aircraft employed and were obsolete by 1918. Originally developed in the U.S. and Australia in the 1890s for cars and boats, it was the French Seguin Brothers’ Societe des Moteurs Gnome who produced a 50-hp, seven-cylinder rotary engine in 1908. By the end of 1917 when they were supplanted by liquid-cooled designs, they developed 100 HP with nine-cylinders. The Sopwith Camel of Snoopy fame was powered by a 130 HP 9-cylinder Clerget (2.9:1 wt/power ratio). Although a French engine, it was also manufactured in England. The rotary design has the crankshaft bolted to the airframe, and the rest of the engine rotates around it. The crankshaft axis is off center from that of the rotating engine, so the pistons reciprocate giving the suck, squeeze, bang and blow of a normal four-stroke engine. There is no carburetor, so to control the engine when landing the pilot had a blip switch to momentarily cut the ignition and hope the engine would start again. Fuel, air and the castor oil lubricant mixed together in the crankcase, and being a total-loss oil system, both burnt and pure castor oil from the exhaust sprayed the front of the fuselage and pilot; it is reported that no pilot suffered from constipation. On the contrary, there were many unscheduled landings to satisfy an urgent call of nature. The tremendous gyroscopic force generated by the whirling of such a heavy mass, resulted in the turn rate to the left of the Gnome engine four times that of a turn to the right. The Clerget rotated in the opposite direction, so it was the right-hand turn that a skilled pilot could exploit in a dogfight if an opponent got on his tail. The German pilots in their Fokker Dr.1. with the Oberusel rotary engine employed the same tactics. Unlike a reciprocating engine in those early airplanes—which had no heavy flywheel—the rotary’s flywheel effect, due to the rotating mass, generated very low vibration levels without the need of counterweights. Its time between overhauls was around 15-20 hours, and the high fuel and oil consumption limited endurance. By August 1916, the increase in power output of liquid-cooled reciprocating engines—particularly the Spanish 1,700 rpm Hispano-Suiza V-8 Abadal fitted to the French SPAD VII, with its synchronized machine guns firing through the propeller disc—gave the allied air forces superiority over the German aircraft. At long last, its 180 hp overcame the weight of the water jacket, pump, plumbing and radiator of the cooling system. However, more powerful air-cooled radial engines were not practical unless a solution was found to cool the cylinders. Shown here, the 100 hp Gnome Monosoupape rotary engine. Photo courtesy of The Science Museum, London. REFERENCES: • John D. Anderson Jr., The Airplane, A History of its Technology, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2002 • Peter L. Jakob, Visions of a Flying Machine, Smithsonian Institution, 1990 • Manuel Large, Hispano Suiza in Aeronautics, SAE International, 2004 • Kimble McCrutcheon: www.enginehistory.org/ gnome • My own flight log book Jetrader 29 http://www.enginehistory.org/
Table of Contents Feed for the Digital Edition of Jetrader - July/August 2008 Jetrader - July/August 2008 A Message from the President Contents Calendar/News Q&A: Ron K. Anderson Challenges Facing the Very Light Jet An Up Close and Personal Analysis of Indian Aviation Inflation and the Upside Case for Aircraft Investors Aircraft Charts Aircraft Appraisals From the ISTAT Foundation Aviation History Jetrader - July/August 2008 Jetrader - July/August 2008 - Jetrader - July/August 2008 (Page Cover1) Jetrader - July/August 2008 - Jetrader - July/August 2008 (Page Cover2) Jetrader - July/August 2008 - A Message from the President (Page 3) Jetrader - July/August 2008 - A Message from the President (Page 4) Jetrader - July/August 2008 - Contents (Page 5) Jetrader - July/August 2008 - Contents (Page 6) Jetrader - July/August 2008 - Calendar/News (Page 7) Jetrader - July/August 2008 - Q&A: Ron K. Anderson (Page 8) Jetrader - July/August 2008 - Q&A: Ron K. Anderson (Page 9) Jetrader - July/August 2008 - Q&A: Ron K. Anderson (Page 10) Jetrader - July/August 2008 - Q&A: Ron K. Anderson (Page 11) Jetrader - July/August 2008 - Q&A: Ron K. Anderson (Page 12) Jetrader - July/August 2008 - Q&A: Ron K. Anderson (Page 13) Jetrader - July/August 2008 - Challenges Facing the Very Light Jet (Page 14) Jetrader - July/August 2008 - Challenges Facing the Very Light Jet (Page 15) Jetrader - July/August 2008 - Challenges Facing the Very Light Jet (Page 16) Jetrader - July/August 2008 - Challenges Facing the Very Light Jet (Page 17) Jetrader - July/August 2008 - An Up Close and Personal Analysis of Indian Aviation (Page 18) Jetrader - July/August 2008 - An Up Close and Personal Analysis of Indian Aviation (Page 19) Jetrader - July/August 2008 - An Up Close and Personal Analysis of Indian Aviation (Page 20) Jetrader - July/August 2008 - An Up Close and Personal Analysis of Indian Aviation (Page 21) Jetrader - July/August 2008 - Inflation and the Upside Case for Aircraft Investors (Page 22) Jetrader - July/August 2008 - Inflation and the Upside Case for Aircraft Investors (Page 23) Jetrader - July/August 2008 - Aircraft Charts (Page 24) Jetrader - July/August 2008 - Aircraft Appraisals (Page 25) Jetrader - July/August 2008 - Aircraft Appraisals (Page 26) Jetrader - July/August 2008 - From the ISTAT Foundation (Page 27) Jetrader - July/August 2008 - Aviation History (Page 28) Jetrader - July/August 2008 - Aviation History (Page 29) Jetrader - July/August 2008 - Aviation History (Page 30) Jetrader - July/August 2008 - Aviation History (Page 31) Jetrader - July/August 2008 - Aviation History (Page 32) Jetrader - July/August 2008 - Aviation History (Page 33) Jetrader - July/August 2008 - Aviation History (Page 34) Jetrader - July/August 2008 - Aviation History (Page Cover3) Jetrader - July/August 2008 - Aviation History (Page Cover4)
For optimal viewing of this digital publication, please enable JavaScript and then refresh the page. If you would like to try to load the digital publication without using Flash Player detection, please click here.