Rural Water - Quarter 3, 2008 - (Page 46)

PROTECTION against permeability is your top concern. Fortunately, it’s ours, too. ost is m ctors ings? nt fa n porta tant li se im al resis the mic h of e Whic al for ch o c gth t riti c stren y urve ity S eabil Permby Learn more about preventive maintenance and restoration at Sauereisen.com 17.8% 11.9% Bond rete conc th treng ive s ress p Com lity to ces eabi bstan Permosive su corr 70.3% p: 412.963.0303 • email: wastewater@sauereisen.com P i t t s b u r g h , PA 1 5 2 3 8 U . S . A • w w w. s a u e r e i s e n . c o m lawsuits and is spent on lawyers and court fees but not providing one drop of clean water, I wanted to make sure they had the right perspective on rural water. Chairman Norman Dicks, a Democrat from Washington state, has been very good to work with. He represents Olympia, which is just right around the Puget Sound, and he has some understanding of the necessity of rural water. We worked together to ensure that this line item remained in the entire Conference process when we sat down and negotiate with the Senate. And I am looking forward to being an advocate for rural water in the next Congress and through the 2009 appropriations cycle — and hopefully for a couple of years after that. But here in Kansas, as you may know, we have 903 public water systems. Ninety-three percent of these are designated by the EPA as small systems, which mean they serve fewer than 3,300 people. Of those, 650 actually serve populations of fewer than 500. That’s 68 percent of our state’s public water systems. There is perhaps no more important state association in the Sunf lower State than the Kansas Rural Water Association. Dependable and affordable access to clean water is basic for our very survival. You know we all want to have the highest quality water possible, and that is a common goal that we share with your customers. It is a goal our state officials and the federal government should share as well. Unfortunately, I have discovered many times that rather than being a partner, the federal government sometimes does not help us advance common goals. The bureaucracy in Washington often takes an adversarial role. As I said earlier, the money ends up getting spent in a lawsuit instead of providing good, clean water. I am sure each of you probably has your own story about dealing with the EPA. We continue to raise standards without providing the funding to meet those standards. It is a challenge, not only for the rural water districts, but also for our municipalities and our cities. I expect the challenge >>48 46 • Third 1 377617_Sauereisen.indd Quarter 2008 5/3/08 5:35:52 PM http://www.PressureSystems.com http://www.sauereisen.com

Table of Contents Feed for the Digital Edition of Rural Water - Quarter 3, 2008

Rural Water - Quarter 3, 2008 Contents From the President From Hypo to Gas - A Forward Leap If You Lose All Your Data Today... Would You Still Be in Business Tomorrow? Weaving the Wireless Web Rural Water and the Farm Bill Ensuring Your Water System's Security Guarding Against Becoming a Victim of Fraud 10 Ways to Improve Utility Efficiency New Technology Making a Difference By Being Involved Regulatory Update Source Water Protection Corner Throwing My Loop Cub Scouts Visit Alliance of Indiana Rural Water's Spring Conference Advertisers.com Index to Advertisers From the CEO

Rural Water - Quarter 3, 2008

For optimal viewing of this digital publication, please enable JavaScript and then refresh the page. If you would like to try to load the digital publication without using Flash Player detection, please click here.