Evaluation Engineering - December 2008 - (Page 29) VOUT CURRENT SOURCE R2 R1 R3 Figure 1. Transimpedance Current-to-Voltage Circuit Courtesy of Maxim Integrated Products/Dallas Semiconductor www. ev alua t ion e n gin e e rin g.com December 2008 • EE • 29 ≥ ≥ plifiers use tracking prefilters to reduce noise levels away from the reference frequency. Up to 20 dB greater noise can be handled in this way, but such filters add their own noise and contribute to phase error. Increased gain following the detector also is problematic because of detector DC offsets and drifts. An important aspect of dynamic reserve is its behavior near the reference frequency. DSP-based filtering provides a totally stable low-pass characteristic with very steep skirts, which increases the dynamic reserve close to the reference. In effect, the detector bandwidth is narrower. A digital lock-in amplifier can have as much as 100 dB of dynamic reserve, where analog systems may be limited to about 60 dB. In addition to basic performance benefits, digital designs typically include analysis functions such as curve fitting, statistics and calculations, and data smoothing algorithms. Multiple auxiliary channels may be available and often the input can be switched between a high-impedance for voltages or a low impedance for currents. Several companies make lock-in amplifiers and the specifications vary widely. A 1-V maximum full-scale range is common, but the most sensitive range varies from 2 nV on the SR850 and Signal Recovery Model 7124 to 1 µV on the Scitec Model 450S. The Signal Recovery instrument is unusual because it has a separate remote input chassis controlled by a fiber-optic link to avoid introducing digital noise into sensitive experiments. It’s also possible to assemble lock-in amplifiers from off-the-shelf building blocks. As described in a National Instruments (NI) case study, a Harvard University research team at The Department of Chemistry needed to make 128 simultaneous low-current measurements on nanowire FET sensors. They used NI’s Model PXI-4472 Dynamic Signal Acquisition modules to sample all 128 channels and a software-based lock-in amplifier technique to extract the desired signals from the noise. Picoammeters Most commonly used ammeters and DMMs indicate current but actually measure the voltage drop, called the burden voltage, across a small shunt resistance. This method is low cost and sufficiently accurate for many appliContinued on page 30 cations. However, accuracy degrades when the shunt re15 V sistance approaches the signal source resistance and the I I = ID R1 burden voltage is no ID longer negligible. In the extreme, a very large shunt is required for nanoRL I L 0.2 pA amp currents, leadR2 1 GΩ ing to long settling times and slow measurement rates. Instead, the feedback ammeter approach 15 V RG = 1 GΩ IG = = 15 nA shown in Figure 1 is 1 GΩ used. The input impedance of the operational amplifier must be very high, but with a suitable Figure 2. Guarded Diode Current Measurement device, the equiva- Courtesy of Keithley Instruments lent burden voltage can be as low as a few tens of microvolts. Because an additional gain factor (R2 + R3)/R3 is provided by the circuit, the values of the resistors can be relatively small even for nanoamp sensitivity, leading to faster measurements. A Keithley Instruments Application Note discusses several noise and error sources encountered in low-current measurements. 1 In addition to the burden voltage, several other error sources become important at lower current levels. For example, leakage currents across or through insulation, noise current generated by triboelectric or piezoelectric effects, current associated with dielectric absorption, and electrochemical effects due to surface contamination can all contribute to measurement errors. Some suggested solutions are obvious: secure connections so that they cannot move and create triboelectric or piezoelectric currents. Clean the PCB or material being measured so that electrochemical effects are minimized. Beyond these precautions, guarding is a very common means of reducing errors caused by leakage currents. Figure 2 shows a typical measurement set up with guarding. The basic idea is to divert the leakage current http://www.evaluationengineering.com
Table of Contents Feed for the Digital Edition of Evaluation Engineering - December 2008 Evaluation Engineering - December 2008 Contents Editorial Product Briefing Test Software C-V Measurements Nanoelectronics Test Product Guide Company Guide Machine Vision EMC Test Index of Advertisers Evaluation Engineering - December 2008 Evaluation Engineering - December 2008 - Evaluation Engineering - December 2008 (Page Cover1) Evaluation Engineering - December 2008 - Evaluation Engineering - December 2008 (Page Cover2) Evaluation Engineering - December 2008 - Evaluation Engineering - December 2008 (Page 1) Evaluation Engineering - December 2008 - Evaluation Engineering - December 2008 (Page 2) Evaluation Engineering - December 2008 - Contents (Page 3) Evaluation Engineering - December 2008 - Contents (Page 4) Evaluation Engineering - December 2008 - Contents (Page 5) Evaluation Engineering - December 2008 - Editorial (Page 6) Evaluation Engineering - December 2008 - Editorial (Page 7) Evaluation Engineering - December 2008 - Product Briefing (Page 8) Evaluation Engineering - December 2008 - Product Briefing (Page 9) Evaluation Engineering - December 2008 - Product Briefing (Page 10) Evaluation Engineering - December 2008 - Product Briefing (Page 11) Evaluation Engineering - December 2008 - Product Briefing (Page 12) Evaluation Engineering - December 2008 - Product Briefing (Page 13) Evaluation Engineering - December 2008 - Test Software (Page 14) Evaluation Engineering - December 2008 - Test Software (Page 15) Evaluation Engineering - December 2008 - Test Software (Page 16) Evaluation Engineering - December 2008 - Test Software (Page 17) Evaluation Engineering - December 2008 - Test Software (Page 18) Evaluation Engineering - December 2008 - Test Software (Page 19) Evaluation Engineering - December 2008 - C-V Measurements (Page 20) Evaluation Engineering - December 2008 - C-V Measurements (Page 21) Evaluation Engineering - December 2008 - C-V Measurements (Page 22) Evaluation Engineering - December 2008 - C-V Measurements (Page 23) Evaluation Engineering - December 2008 - C-V Measurements (Page 24) Evaluation Engineering - December 2008 - C-V Measurements (Page 25) Evaluation Engineering - December 2008 - Nanoelectronics Test (Page 26) Evaluation Engineering - December 2008 - Nanoelectronics Test (Page 27) Evaluation Engineering - December 2008 - Nanoelectronics Test (Page 28) Evaluation Engineering - December 2008 - Nanoelectronics Test (Page 29) Evaluation Engineering - December 2008 - Nanoelectronics Test (Page 30) Evaluation Engineering - December 2008 - Nanoelectronics Test (Page 31) Evaluation Engineering - December 2008 - Product Guide (Page 32) Evaluation Engineering - December 2008 - Product Guide (Page 33) Evaluation Engineering - December 2008 - Product Guide (Page 34) Evaluation Engineering - December 2008 - Product Guide (Page 35) Evaluation Engineering - December 2008 - Company Guide (Page 36) Evaluation Engineering - December 2008 - Company Guide (Page 37) Evaluation Engineering - December 2008 - Machine Vision (Page 38) Evaluation Engineering - December 2008 - Machine Vision (Page 39) Evaluation Engineering - December 2008 - Machine Vision (Page 40) Evaluation Engineering - December 2008 - Machine Vision (Page 41) Evaluation Engineering - December 2008 - Machine Vision (Page 42) Evaluation Engineering - December 2008 - Machine Vision (Page 43) Evaluation Engineering - December 2008 - EMC Test (Page 44) Evaluation Engineering - December 2008 - EMC Test (Page 45) Evaluation Engineering - December 2008 - EMC Test (Page 46) Evaluation Engineering - December 2008 - EMC Test (Page 47) Evaluation Engineering - December 2008 - EMC Test (Page 48) Evaluation Engineering - December 2008 - EMC Test (Page 49) Evaluation Engineering - December 2008 - EMC Test (Page 50) Evaluation Engineering - December 2008 - EMC Test (Page 51) Evaluation Engineering - December 2008 - Index of Advertisers (Page 52) Evaluation Engineering - December 2008 - Index of Advertisers (Page Cover3) Evaluation Engineering - December 2008 - Index of Advertisers (Page Cover4)
For optimal viewing of this digital publication, please enable JavaScript and then refresh the page. If you would like to try to load the digital publication without using Flash Player detection, please click here.