Evaluation Engineering - December 2008 - (Page 45) Figure 1. Example of a Highly Directional Open Boundary Quad-Ridged Horn Antenna as these developments mature. ANSI ASC C63 ® membership represents industry, regulatory bodies, military, universities, and consultants located in the United States, so a wide range of users impacted by ANSI standards has direct input. With the global economy driving the market, there is an increasing need to harmonize the various antenna calibration standards where appropriate. Work began over a decade ago specifically to bring the Standard Site Method (SSM) of ANSI C63.5 into the European standard CISPR 16 as the method of antenna calibration to be used. However, parts of the standard did not meet the view of the CISPR working group then assigned this task. In the SSM method, the antenna factor was derived at a particular antenna height above the ground plane. There also was discussion on the accuracy and uncertainty of such antenna calibrations that still is being argued, namely what ANSI C63.5 provides vs. what the other proposed calibrations require. Of course, the needs of the user must be better defined in the accuracy and uncertainty of the calibrations. For example, is it absolutely necessary to have an antenna calibration that has the lowest uncertainty if the other techniques have uncertainties slightly larger? Near Free-Space Antenna Factor (NFSAF) Antennas calibrated under NFSAF over a conducting ground plane are specified with horizontal polarization, R=10 m, h 1 =2m, and h 2 =1 to 4 m. Under this geometry, antenna factors are minimally affected by the test environment. This is what you have been getting with your antenna calibration for years, and it should match up with previous calibration data. The calibration is performed on a high-quality antenna test site defined in both ASC C63.5-2006 and CISPR Pub 16-1-5 (2003). Free-Space Antenna Factor (FSAF) Ideally, FSAF is an environment having no reflections or couplings to the antennas. It is not very realistic. In the case of biconical antennas, to get the FSAF using ANSI C63.52006, a correction factor is applied to the actual calibration that produced the NFSAF. The FSAF shall be used for product testing and site validation measurements in conjunction with the geometry-specific correction factors (GSCF). In the case of broadband horn antennas that are highly directional (Figure 1), there is an option for the FSAFs. These are measured using a technique where the antenna does not see signal reflections or the reflections are so small they have little or no effect on the calibration. GSCF GSCFs are provided by the standard or measured for each frequency at a specific geometry. These correction factors are for a pair of antennas for test-site validation and are not geometry-specific antenna factors. SSM The SSM is the most commonly used method for antenna calibration over a conducting ground plane and highlighted in ANSI C63.5. Usually three pairs of measurements are needed which involve three antennas. Continued on page 46 levear AV Measurement Instruments Suitable for Car AV Equipment NEW AV Multitester VP-7670T Compact tester combining Audio analyzer, Video analyzer, and AM/FM Signal generator. www.kikusuiamerica.com Common Terms Here is a listing of the most common terms related to antenna calibration: www. ev alua t ion e n gin e e rin g.com Visit www.rsleads.com/812ee-007 http://www.rsleads.com/812ee-007 http://www.evaluationengineering.com http://www.rsleads.com/812ee-007
Table of Contents Feed for the Digital Edition of Evaluation Engineering - December 2008 Evaluation Engineering - December 2008 Contents Editorial Product Briefing Test Software C-V Measurements Nanoelectronics Test Product Guide Company Guide Machine Vision EMC Test Index of Advertisers Evaluation Engineering - December 2008 Evaluation Engineering - December 2008 - Evaluation Engineering - December 2008 (Page Cover1) Evaluation Engineering - December 2008 - Evaluation Engineering - December 2008 (Page Cover2) Evaluation Engineering - December 2008 - Evaluation Engineering - December 2008 (Page 1) Evaluation Engineering - December 2008 - Evaluation Engineering - December 2008 (Page 2) Evaluation Engineering - December 2008 - Contents (Page 3) Evaluation Engineering - December 2008 - Contents (Page 4) Evaluation Engineering - December 2008 - Contents (Page 5) Evaluation Engineering - December 2008 - Editorial (Page 6) Evaluation Engineering - December 2008 - Editorial (Page 7) Evaluation Engineering - December 2008 - Product Briefing (Page 8) Evaluation Engineering - December 2008 - Product Briefing (Page 9) Evaluation Engineering - December 2008 - Product Briefing (Page 10) Evaluation Engineering - December 2008 - Product Briefing (Page 11) Evaluation Engineering - December 2008 - Product Briefing (Page 12) Evaluation Engineering - December 2008 - Product Briefing (Page 13) Evaluation Engineering - December 2008 - Test Software (Page 14) Evaluation Engineering - December 2008 - Test Software (Page 15) Evaluation Engineering - December 2008 - Test Software (Page 16) Evaluation Engineering - December 2008 - Test Software (Page 17) Evaluation Engineering - December 2008 - Test Software (Page 18) Evaluation Engineering - December 2008 - Test Software (Page 19) Evaluation Engineering - December 2008 - C-V Measurements (Page 20) Evaluation Engineering - December 2008 - C-V Measurements (Page 21) Evaluation Engineering - December 2008 - C-V Measurements (Page 22) Evaluation Engineering - December 2008 - C-V Measurements (Page 23) Evaluation Engineering - December 2008 - C-V Measurements (Page 24) Evaluation Engineering - December 2008 - C-V Measurements (Page 25) Evaluation Engineering - December 2008 - Nanoelectronics Test (Page 26) Evaluation Engineering - December 2008 - Nanoelectronics Test (Page 27) Evaluation Engineering - December 2008 - Nanoelectronics Test (Page 28) Evaluation Engineering - December 2008 - Nanoelectronics Test (Page 29) Evaluation Engineering - December 2008 - Nanoelectronics Test (Page 30) Evaluation Engineering - December 2008 - Nanoelectronics Test (Page 31) Evaluation Engineering - December 2008 - Product Guide (Page 32) Evaluation Engineering - December 2008 - Product Guide (Page 33) Evaluation Engineering - December 2008 - Product Guide (Page 34) Evaluation Engineering - December 2008 - Product Guide (Page 35) Evaluation Engineering - December 2008 - Company Guide (Page 36) Evaluation Engineering - December 2008 - Company Guide (Page 37) Evaluation Engineering - December 2008 - Machine Vision (Page 38) Evaluation Engineering - December 2008 - Machine Vision (Page 39) Evaluation Engineering - December 2008 - Machine Vision (Page 40) Evaluation Engineering - December 2008 - Machine Vision (Page 41) Evaluation Engineering - December 2008 - Machine Vision (Page 42) Evaluation Engineering - December 2008 - Machine Vision (Page 43) Evaluation Engineering - December 2008 - EMC Test (Page 44) Evaluation Engineering - December 2008 - EMC Test (Page 45) Evaluation Engineering - December 2008 - EMC Test (Page 46) Evaluation Engineering - December 2008 - EMC Test (Page 47) Evaluation Engineering - December 2008 - EMC Test (Page 48) Evaluation Engineering - December 2008 - EMC Test (Page 49) Evaluation Engineering - December 2008 - EMC Test (Page 50) Evaluation Engineering - December 2008 - EMC Test (Page 51) Evaluation Engineering - December 2008 - Index of Advertisers (Page 52) Evaluation Engineering - December 2008 - Index of Advertisers (Page Cover3) Evaluation Engineering - December 2008 - Index of Advertisers (Page Cover4)
For optimal viewing of this digital publication, please enable JavaScript and then refresh the page. If you would like to try to load the digital publication without using Flash Player detection, please click here.