AV Technology - October 2008 - (Page 16) avantage corporate by Joey D’Angelo RESIDENTIAL AV DOES NOT EQUAL COMMERCIAL AV Why residential integrators should stay home, and commercial integrators should go to work. O ften, I’ll be attending a meeting with a new client who is having AV problems and notice that they have a consumer-grade plasma screen on the wall of their boardroom. Before the specifics of the company’s audiovisual ailments are even mentioned, I usually have a hunch as to what happened. It usually turns out that the CEO or owner of the company had a snazzy audiovisual system installed at his or her residence and asked that same AV integrator to do his or her boardroom. This happens all too often in the corporate AV market. The truth is that there are two genres of AV integrator — residential and commercial. Some can do both types of work, but a good “resimercial” contractor is hard to find. Even if you find an integrator with competence in both areas, does having those crossgenre skills bring much to the table? If you need a system installed in your company’s boardroom, the first thing to consider with an integrator is their specific skillset. I’ve seen many residential vendors trying use line-level audio or RCA connectors for video interconnections. In fact, some residential contractors aren’t even proficient in basic soldering skills, since they typically use pre-terminated off-the-shelf interconnects or RCA-type connectors. In a commercial environment, all wires are cut to length, hand terminated, tested, labeled, and documented. If an integrator only has experience with preterminated cables, then surely these skills will be lacking, and could lead to failures. A residential integrator may not have access to commercial lines from companies such as Polycom, Tandberg, Sharp, or Extron — all staples in the commercial AV integration market. So if you have a residential integrator do a conference room at your office and they provide you with a Tandberg codec, chances are they bought it through a wholesaler or two-stepped its procurement. This could lead to warranty issues in the future. Probably the most frequent problem that rears its ugly head when a residential contractor is asked to provide a system in a commercial environment is the use of a consumer-grade display system. All too often you will see a something like a high-end Pioneer Elite plasma screen or a top-of-the line Runco projector being used for PowerPoint presentations. Both great products — but they are not necessarily suited to the display of static images. A good commercial-grade LCD display would be better suited to the conference or boardroom than a high-end plasma screen. The residential integrator just wants to give their commercial client the best product that they sell; probably unaware that it isn’t well suited for the application. There are some AV product categories that are simply not appropriate for residential applications, which means residential integrators would have no reason to have expertise in these areas. A good example of this is echo cancellers in conferencing applications. Imagine a residential integrator trying to make an echo canceller work perfectly in a commercial installation; chances are the endeavor won’t end with a success story and a happy client. And I have seen many AV manufacturers put someone on a plane at their own expense and travel across the country just to support one of their products, even though an inappropriately qualified integrator installed it. The fact is that most residential integrators are great at what they do, especially if they are PROBABLY THE MOST FREQUENT PROBLEM THAT REARS ITS UGLY HEAD WHEN A RESIDENTIAL CONTRACTOR IS ASKED TO PROVIDE A SYSTEM IN A COMMERCIAL ENVIRONMENT IS THE USE OF A CONSUMER-GRADE DISPLAY SYSTEM. Consumer products creeping into the workplace have more drawbacks than just cost and overkill. In the case of displays, consumer products may have shorter warranties and lack PC compatibility, heat management, and many of the mounting options that are standard to commercial products. And I’ve seen entire boardroom systems with a control system that utilized only IR-based control. This practice is not recommended in a mission-critical, commercial environment. There is another area where using a residential integrator on a commercial project might result in problems. If a residential integrator does not employ union skilled labor, you could find your drywallers, plumbers, electricians, and millworkers literally walking right off the job, causing construction-related delays. CEDIA certified. And there are just as many caveats to considering a commercial integrator for a high-end home theater or distributed audio system project in a custom home. But the next time your CEO says, “Use this company, they did my multi-million dollar house,” you may want to say, “Well, boss I will if you insist, but I would recommend using a commercial contractor who is better suited to the challenges present in a corporate construction project.” The successful outcome of your project — and your job — may well depend on it. Joey D’Angelo is a principal consultant with Charles M. Salter Associates in San Francisco, CA, and specializes in AV/telecommunication systems. Joey is also a musician in a punk rock band where he plays guitar and performs lead vocals. He can be reached at joseph.dangelo@cmsalter.com. www.avtechnologyonline.com 16 | AVTECHNOLOGY | october 2008 http://www.avtechnologyonline.com
Table of Contents Feed for the Digital Edition of AV Technology - October 2008 AV Technology - October 2008 Contents Precedent Corporate: Residential AV Does Not Equal Commercial AV Government: Funding Problems? Education: DIY ISP.EDU, Part Two The Cost of Bandwidth Star Grounding Wars Understanding IoIP How to Equip a Smart Classroom Two Rooms With A View From Primitive to Professional Product Review:Visionary Solutions AVN 420 Encoder Product Spotlight: Document Cameras New Products Ad Index AV MO: Using Infrared Microphones AV Technology - October 2008 AV Technology - October 2008 - AV Technology - October 2008 (Page Cover1) AV Technology - October 2008 - AV Technology - October 2008 (Page Cover2) AV Technology - October 2008 - AV Technology - October 2008 (Page 3) AV Technology - October 2008 - AV Technology - October 2008 (Page 4) AV Technology - October 2008 - Contents (Page 5) AV Technology - October 2008 - Contents (Page 6) AV Technology - October 2008 - Contents (Page 7) AV Technology - October 2008 - Contents (Page 8) AV Technology - October 2008 - Contents (Page 9) AV Technology - October 2008 - Precedent (Page 10) AV Technology - October 2008 - Precedent (Page 11) AV Technology - October 2008 - Precedent (Page 12) AV Technology - October 2008 - Precedent (Page 13) AV Technology - October 2008 - Precedent (Page 14) AV Technology - October 2008 - Precedent (Page 15) AV Technology - October 2008 - Corporate: Residential AV Does Not Equal Commercial AV (Page 16) AV Technology - October 2008 - Corporate: Residential AV Does Not Equal Commercial AV (Page 17) AV Technology - October 2008 - Government: Funding Problems? (Page 18) AV Technology - October 2008 - Government: Funding Problems? (Page 19) AV Technology - October 2008 - Education: DIY ISP.EDU, Part Two (Page 20) AV Technology - October 2008 - Education: DIY ISP.EDU, Part Two (Page 21) AV Technology - October 2008 - The Cost of Bandwidth (Page 22) AV Technology - October 2008 - The Cost of Bandwidth (Page 23) AV Technology - October 2008 - The Cost of Bandwidth (Page 24) AV Technology - October 2008 - The Cost of Bandwidth (Page 25) AV Technology - October 2008 - Star Grounding Wars (Page 26) AV Technology - October 2008 - Star Grounding Wars (Page 27) AV Technology - October 2008 - Star Grounding Wars (Page 28) AV Technology - October 2008 - Star Grounding Wars (Page 29) AV Technology - October 2008 - Star Grounding Wars (Page 30) AV Technology - October 2008 - Understanding IoIP (Page 31) AV Technology - October 2008 - Understanding IoIP (Page 32) AV Technology - October 2008 - Understanding IoIP (Page 33) AV Technology - October 2008 - Understanding IoIP (Page 34) AV Technology - October 2008 - Understanding IoIP (Page 35) AV Technology - October 2008 - Understanding IoIP (Page 36) AV Technology - October 2008 - Understanding IoIP (Page 37) AV Technology - October 2008 - How to Equip a Smart Classroom (Page 38) AV Technology - October 2008 - How to Equip a Smart Classroom (Page 39) AV Technology - October 2008 - How to Equip a Smart Classroom (Page 40) AV Technology - October 2008 - How to Equip a Smart Classroom (Page 41) AV Technology - October 2008 - Two Rooms With A View (Page 42) AV Technology - October 2008 - Two Rooms With A View (Page 43) AV Technology - October 2008 - From Primitive to Professional (Page 44) AV Technology - October 2008 - From Primitive to Professional (Page 45) AV Technology - October 2008 - Product Review:Visionary Solutions AVN 420 Encoder (Page 46) AV Technology - October 2008 - Product Review:Visionary Solutions AVN 420 Encoder (Page 47) AV Technology - October 2008 - Product Spotlight: Document Cameras (Page 48) AV Technology - October 2008 - Product Spotlight: Document Cameras (Page 49) AV Technology - October 2008 - Product Spotlight: Document Cameras (Page 50) AV Technology - October 2008 - New Products (Page 51) AV Technology - October 2008 - New Products (Page 52) AV Technology - October 2008 - New Products (Page 53) AV Technology - October 2008 - New Products (Page 54) AV Technology - October 2008 - New Products (Page 55) AV Technology - October 2008 - New Products (Page 56) AV Technology - October 2008 - Ad Index (Page 57) AV Technology - October 2008 - AV MO: Using Infrared Microphones (Page 58) AV Technology - October 2008 - AV MO: Using Infrared Microphones (Page Cover3) AV Technology - October 2008 - AV MO: Using Infrared Microphones (Page Cover4)
For optimal viewing of this digital publication, please enable JavaScript and then refresh the page. If you would like to try to load the digital publication without using Flash Player detection, please click here.