Technology & Learning - October 2007 - (Page 38) » Point of View By Kathy Schrock Critical Evaluation in the Collaborative Era What role should a wiki play in authentic research? I began using critical evaluation techniques back in 1995, when I was choosing sites to add to my then-new portal, Kathy Schrock’s Guide for Educators. I would look at a potential entry and use a series of analytical questions to determine, first, if the content would be useful for teachers, followed by a rather formal process to determine the authority of the author and the validity of the information, and, finally, look at the navigability of the site. I then created Web site critical evaluation tools for teachers and students to use based on my process—tools that have been used extensively over the years. As social collaborative tools such as blogs and podcasts proliferated, I added new tools to evaluate them. As even newer tools show up on the Web, I investigate them to determine how they can be used in education. One of the new types of social collaborative tools I feel is useful to support teaching and learning is a wiki. With a wiki, a user creates and posts content, and then anyone else can log in and change or update the content, and all iterations are archived and accessible. For student collaboration, peer editing, note taking, and many other uses, the wiki is a great educational tool. Teachers can easily track student postings and acquisition of knowledge since all of the changes 38 | www.techlearning.com the information is correct? Do they look at every iteration of the page and try to determine the authority of everyone who edited the information? What about the fact that the creator’s real name may not appear anywhere? True, Wikipedia does allow viewers to see all the edits made by other users. So should students then take a look at each editor’s summary page to see if that particular user is posting to many Wikipedia pages on similar topics, which may (or may not) indicate he and updates are logged. or she is an expert on the topic? The However, the multi-creator, infortraditional methods of attempting to mational character of the public wiki determine the authority of an author defies my ability to critically evaluate would include looking at the “About the information. One of the largest the Author” page, conducting a Web and best-known wikis is Wikipedia, search on the author’s name to find which touts itself as a “free encycloout how he or she is mentioned by pedia.” I have others in the field, difficulty, as a and doing a back“Does passion about a topic library media mean the information is valid ward search on specialist and an the author’s Web and reliable?” educator, coming page to see who up with a process links to the to evaluate the information located author’s site. How does one complete on a Wikipedia page. Granted, conthis task on Wikipedia with so many tent creators who are passionate authors of a single article and no real about a topic maintain these pages, names? but this passion may also lead to Even if I go along with the users of biased information. And does passion Wikipedia who say that it is self-corabout a topic also mean the informarecting—since so many volunteer tion is valid and reliable? “editors” monitor the pages and correct Since anyone can post content, any erroneous information—I would and anyone can edit the content on a still like to find out a little bit about wiki, how do students determine if these “editors” who are creating con- http://www.techlearning.com
Table of Contents Feed for the Digital Edition of Technology & Learning - October 2007 Technology & Learning - October 2007 Editor’s Desk News & Trends Product Guide Reviews How Fast Is Fast Enough? Cover Story: Career Education in the Digital Age Getting It Wrong Higher Ed Point of View How To Bottom Line What’s New Emerging Tech Technology & Learning - October 2007 Technology & Learning - October 2007 - Technology & Learning - October 2007 (Page Cover1) Technology & Learning - October 2007 - Technology & Learning - October 2007 (Page Cover2) Technology & Learning - October 2007 - Technology & Learning - October 2007 (Page 1) Technology & Learning - October 2007 - Editor’s Desk (Page 2) Technology & Learning - October 2007 - Editor’s Desk (Page 3) Technology & Learning - October 2007 - News & Trends (Page 4) Technology & Learning - October 2007 - News & Trends (Page 5) Technology & Learning - October 2007 - Product Guide (Page 6) Technology & Learning - October 2007 - Product Guide (Page 7) Technology & Learning - October 2007 - Product Guide (Page 8) Technology & Learning - October 2007 - Product Guide (Page 9) Technology & Learning - October 2007 - Product Guide (Page 10) Technology & Learning - October 2007 - Product Guide (Page 11) Technology & Learning - October 2007 - Reviews (Page 12) Technology & Learning - October 2007 - Reviews (Page 13) Technology & Learning - October 2007 - Reviews (Page 14) Technology & Learning - October 2007 - Reviews (Page 15) Technology & Learning - October 2007 - How Fast Is Fast Enough? (Page 16) Technology & Learning - October 2007 - How Fast Is Fast Enough? (Page HP1) Technology & Learning - October 2007 - How Fast Is Fast Enough? (Page HP2) Technology & Learning - October 2007 - How Fast Is Fast Enough? (Page 17) Technology & Learning - October 2007 - How Fast Is Fast Enough? (Page 18) Technology & Learning - October 2007 - How Fast Is Fast Enough? (Page 19) Technology & Learning - October 2007 - How Fast Is Fast Enough? (Page 20) Technology & Learning - October 2007 - How Fast Is Fast Enough? (Page 21) Technology & Learning - October 2007 - Cover Story: Career Education in the Digital Age (Page 22) Technology & Learning - October 2007 - Cover Story: Career Education in the Digital Age (Page 23) Technology & Learning - October 2007 - Cover Story: Career Education in the Digital Age (Page 24) Technology & Learning - October 2007 - Cover Story: Career Education in the Digital Age (Page 25) Technology & Learning - October 2007 - Cover Story: Career Education in the Digital Age (Page 26) Technology & Learning - October 2007 - Cover Story: Career Education in the Digital Age (Page 27) Technology & Learning - October 2007 - Cover Story: Career Education in the Digital Age (Page 28) Technology & Learning - October 2007 - Cover Story: Career Education in the Digital Age (Page 29) Technology & Learning - October 2007 - Getting It Wrong (Page 30) Technology & Learning - October 2007 - Getting It Wrong (Page 31) Technology & Learning - October 2007 - Getting It Wrong (Page 32) Technology & Learning - October 2007 - Getting It Wrong (Page 33) Technology & Learning - October 2007 - Getting It Wrong (Page 34) Technology & Learning - October 2007 - Getting It Wrong (Page 35) Technology & Learning - October 2007 - Higher Ed (Page 36) Technology & Learning - October 2007 - Higher Ed (Page 37) Technology & Learning - October 2007 - Point of View (Page 38) Technology & Learning - October 2007 - Point of View (Page 39) Technology & Learning - October 2007 - How To (Page 40) Technology & Learning - October 2007 - How To (Page 41) Technology & Learning - October 2007 - How To (Page 42) Technology & Learning - October 2007 - How To (Page 43) Technology & Learning - October 2007 - Bottom Line (Page 44) Technology & Learning - October 2007 - Bottom Line (Page 45) Technology & Learning - October 2007 - What’s New (Page 46) Technology & Learning - October 2007 - What’s New (Page 47) Technology & Learning - October 2007 - Emerging Tech (Page 48) Technology & Learning - October 2007 - Emerging Tech (Page Cover3) Technology & Learning - October 2007 - Emerging Tech (Page Cover4)
For optimal viewing of this digital publication, please enable JavaScript and then refresh the page. If you would like to try to load the digital publication without using Flash Player detection, please click here.