STORES Magazine - February 2009 - (Page 52) LPINFORMATION / RETURNS MANAGEMENT tomers who typically account for 99 percent of all transactions. Such a process makes it easier for a cashier directed by the program to decline a return to tell a customer, “I’m sorry, but our system says this return cannot be authorized.” The cashier can give the customer a number to call to learn why the return was declined and to appeal the process, if they choose. “By making it easy for customers to appeal a decline, management is able to provide a consistently high level of service,” says Mike Smith, senior vice president of loss prevention for Finish Line, a chain of 700-plus specialty stores that operate under the Finish Line and Man Alive banners. The system “takes pressure off the with return fraud, and the Verify-1 software applies sophisticated analytics to determine if such a pattern exists. For example, an individual might steal items from one store and return them to another store, claiming the sales receipt was lost. Or an individual might buy an item, leave the store with it, come back, steal the same item, and then use the receipt from the purchased item to ask for a return and their money back. At some future point, they might also return the purchased item, claiming they lost the receipt. Tied to customer ID By tying all returns to a customer’s ID, the software can review that customer’s returns history: If their behavior looks suspicious, the software, programmed ic customer ID, making it harder for them to cheat by faking a return. While Finish Line has exception reporting capabilities within its POS system that help identify internal fraud, the Verify-1 application “is a more pro-active way of identifying fraud,” Smith says. “If someone is tempted to commit fraud, then they may realize that it’s probably not a good idea to go there because they have to make up additional information to conceal the fraud.” Return Rewards After implementing Verify-1, Finish Line saw “a significant reduction in both returns and return fraud. Based on the annual reductions in our return rates, we had no problem justifying our investment,” Smith says. And reducing return rates “also means that we preserved some sales, so that positively affects your shrink rate as a percentage of sales,” he says. “So the system has an impact on our ability to reduce return rates and reduce fraud, both internal and external.” In addition to preventing bad customers from making fraudulent returns, the Verify-1 return authorization program can be used to reward good customers by issuing targeted incentives through TRE’s Return Rewards application. “That helps increase customer service and helps to keep more money in the stores,” Rittman says. Rittman cites research indicating that 54 percent of customers fail to make a new purchase at a chain within 18 months of returning merchandise. Retailers using Return Rewards, on the other hand, “often report that customers who return a single purchase, on average, wind up buying two items. They have a refund in hand and they have a discount incentive that they need to use within a certain time period set by the retailer, so they go and shop while StORES they are in the store.” Liz Parks is a Union City, N.J.-based writer with extensive experience reporting on retail, pharmacy and technology issues. WWW.STORES.ORG cashiers when they have to decline a return and also makes it possible for us to have one consistent returns process applied evenly throughout our stores.” Finish Line was scrupulous in selecting a returns software application that was easy for employees to use and easy for customers to understand. “We were most impressed by The Retail Equation,” Smith says. “We liked the extent of their history with their product, as well as their list of retail customers that were using it.” TRE’s Verify-1 collects ID information about customers — driver’s license, military card, etc. — and synchronizes that ID to the individual’s return activities. There is typically a pattern associated 52 STORES / FEBRUARY 2009 according to that retailer’s returns policies, directs the clerk to decline the return. Managers can override a decline if they deem it appropriate. More than 12,000 retail stores are using TRE’s services to significantly reduce fraud and the negative financial impact of returns by recapturing those refund dollars (lost sales) through incentive programs tailored specifically to honest customers who make returns. On average, Rittman says, retailers using TRE’s applications experience a 6 to 7 percent reduction in their annual return rates. He also points out that the software also discourages internal fraud because clerks and cashiers know they have to associate a return with a specif- http://WWW.STORES.ORG
Table of Contents Feed for the Digital Edition of STORES Magazine - February 2009 STORES Magazine - February 2009 Contents Executive Editor's Page President's Page Are You a Pusher or a Puller? What Shoppers Think Online Retail Satisfaction 10 Things You May Have Missed Numbers Worth Counting Full Price/Markdown Retail People Cover Story - Something’s Got to Give First Look Concept2Watch Online Partners Merchandising Sustainability Inventory Systems Drug Store Systems Business Intelligence Inventory Managment Online Marketing Supply Chain - Better Data, Better Decisions Returns Management - Identifying Fraud Data Security - Securing Intimate Data Anti-Shoplifting - Mall of Shame? Risk Management - Securing Consumer Confidence Loeb Retail letter ARTS Update Point of View NRF News Retail Crossword Retail Industry Calendar End Cap STORES Magazine - February 2009 STORES Magazine - February 2009 - STORES Magazine - February 2009 (Page Cover1) STORES Magazine - February 2009 - STORES Magazine - February 2009 (Page Cover2) STORES Magazine - February 2009 - STORES Magazine - February 2009 (Page 3) STORES Magazine - February 2009 - Contents (Page 4) STORES Magazine - February 2009 - Contents (Page 5) STORES Magazine - February 2009 - Contents (Page 6) STORES Magazine - February 2009 - Contents (Page 7) STORES Magazine - February 2009 - Executive Editor's Page (Page 8) STORES Magazine - February 2009 - Executive Editor's Page (Page 9) STORES Magazine - February 2009 - President's Page (Page 10) STORES Magazine - February 2009 - President's Page (Page 11) STORES Magazine - February 2009 - Are You a Pusher or a Puller? (Page 12) STORES Magazine - February 2009 - What Shoppers Think (Page 13) STORES Magazine - February 2009 - Online Retail Satisfaction (Page 14) STORES Magazine - February 2009 - Online Retail Satisfaction (Page 15) STORES Magazine - February 2009 - 10 Things You May Have Missed (Page 16) STORES Magazine - February 2009 - Numbers Worth Counting (Page 17) STORES Magazine - February 2009 - Full Price/Markdown (Page 18) STORES Magazine - February 2009 - Full Price/Markdown (Page 19) STORES Magazine - February 2009 - Full Price/Markdown (Page 20) STORES Magazine - February 2009 - Full Price/Markdown (Page 21) STORES Magazine - February 2009 - Retail People (Page 22) STORES Magazine - February 2009 - Retail People (Page 23) STORES Magazine - February 2009 - Cover Story - Something’s Got to Give (Page 24) STORES Magazine - February 2009 - Cover Story - Something’s Got to Give (Page 25) STORES Magazine - February 2009 - Cover Story - Something’s Got to Give (Page 26) STORES Magazine - February 2009 - Cover Story - Something’s Got to Give (Page 27) STORES Magazine - February 2009 - First Look (Page 28) STORES Magazine - February 2009 - First Look (Page 29) STORES Magazine - February 2009 - Concept2Watch (Page 30) STORES Magazine - February 2009 - Concept2Watch (Page 31) STORES Magazine - February 2009 - Online Partners (Page 32) STORES Magazine - February 2009 - Merchandising (Page 33) STORES Magazine - February 2009 - Sustainability (Page 34) STORES Magazine - February 2009 - Sustainability (Page 35) STORES Magazine - February 2009 - Sustainability (Page 36) STORES Magazine - February 2009 - Inventory Systems (Page 37) STORES Magazine - February 2009 - Inventory Systems (Page 38) STORES Magazine - February 2009 - Inventory Systems (Page 39) STORES Magazine - February 2009 - Drug Store Systems (Page 40) STORES Magazine - February 2009 - Drug Store Systems (Page 41) STORES Magazine - February 2009 - Business Intelligence (Page 42) STORES Magazine - February 2009 - Business Intelligence (Page 43) STORES Magazine - February 2009 - Inventory Managment (Page 44) STORES Magazine - February 2009 - Inventory Managment (Page 45) STORES Magazine - February 2009 - Online Marketing (Page 46) STORES Magazine - February 2009 - Online Marketing (Page 47) STORES Magazine - February 2009 - Online Marketing (Page 48) STORES Magazine - February 2009 - Supply Chain - Better Data, Better Decisions (Page 49) STORES Magazine - February 2009 - Supply Chain - Better Data, Better Decisions (Page 50) STORES Magazine - February 2009 - Returns Management - Identifying Fraud (Page 51) STORES Magazine - February 2009 - Returns Management - Identifying Fraud (Page 52) STORES Magazine - February 2009 - Returns Management - Identifying Fraud (Page 53) STORES Magazine - February 2009 - Data Security - Securing Intimate Data (Page 54) STORES Magazine - February 2009 - Data Security - Securing Intimate Data (Page 55) STORES Magazine - February 2009 - Data Security - Securing Intimate Data (Page 56) STORES Magazine - February 2009 - Anti-Shoplifting - Mall of Shame? (Page 57) STORES Magazine - February 2009 - Risk Management - Securing Consumer Confidence (Page 58) STORES Magazine - February 2009 - Loeb Retail letter (Page 59) STORES Magazine - February 2009 - ARTS Update (Page 60) STORES Magazine - February 2009 - Point of View (Page 61) STORES Magazine - February 2009 - NRF News (Page 62) STORES Magazine - February 2009 - Retail Crossword (Page 63) STORES Magazine - February 2009 - Retail Crossword (Page 64) STORES Magazine - February 2009 - Retail Industry Calendar (Page 65) STORES Magazine - February 2009 - End Cap (Page 66) STORES Magazine - February 2009 - End Cap (Page Cover3) STORES Magazine - February 2009 - End Cap (Page Cover4)
For optimal viewing of this digital publication, please enable JavaScript and then refresh the page. If you would like to try to load the digital publication without using Flash Player detection, please click here.