Triumph - 2013 Fall Winter - (Page 17B)

Step 3 Step 4 Step 5 Step 6 Each application is independently analyzed and ranked by two peer reviewers. (A third reviewer is added to resolve any disagreements.) Next, using an online management system, all reviewers prepare a detailed critique of their assigned applications so that applicants can benefit from the review process. Committee members attend a two-day session at the Society's Atlanta, Georgia, home office to further review each application and to reach a consensus about its merit. Each application is then given a score to indicate funding priority. Committees also identify all grants they believe should be approved for funding. The Extramural Grants Council reviews the recommendations of all 20 Peer Review Committees and makes the final determination in awarding grants and allocating funds. This committee is comprised of 24 individuals who have previously served as peer reviewers. Because of limited resources, not all approved applications receive funding. These are tagged "Pay-If": The Society will pay for the research project if a donor(s) can be found. GrantS funded peer reviewerS analyze & rank applicationS committeeS meet to make fundinG recommendationS extramural GrantS council awardS fundinG aSSiGned aS "pay-if" Grant recipients must file reports documenting progress and use of funds throughout the life of the grant (usually four years). 1.800.227.2345 cancer.org  http://www.cancer.org

Table of Contents for the Digital Edition of Triumph - 2013 Fall Winter

Triumph - 2013 Fall Winter
Contents
Finish the Fight
Stay Well
Get Well
Find Cures
Fight Back
Share

Triumph - 2013 Fall Winter

https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/pace/triumph_2013fallwinter
https://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/pace/triumph_1913-2013
https://www.nxtbookmedia.com