Broadcast Engineering - February 2009 - (Page 28) by Neil Maycock s more and more program flows involve files rather than traditional video signals, a debate has emerged over how, when or if traditional crosspoint routers should be replaced by IP networks. After all, hardly a day goes by without another task being performed via the mother of all networks, the Internet. Also, recent major sporting events, such as the UEFA Euro 2008 Football Championships and FIFA World Cup Football, have been covered with high-bandwidth IP-based contribution networks at specific locations. Is it time to adopt the same principle for studio acquisition and program playout? The first step is to examine the benefits and drawbacks of each. Crosspoint routing The traditional crosspoint router is a matrix of electronic switches that can connect combinations of inputs to outputs. Typically an input signal can be switched to multiple outputs, making the router distributive. Figure 1 on page 30 shows a representation of a crosspoint router with four inputs and four outputs. The crosses represent active switches connecting an input to an output. For a clean video switch, the devices handling the video have to operate synchronously with the video, switching between sources in a nonvisible part of the video signal. This requires switches to be accurately timed to at least 40ms in the case of standard definition. Another key requirement for the crosspoint router is to have 100 percent availability for any switch. With a separate electronic switch for every possible path through the router, it is inherent in the design. However, this guaranteed availability comes at a price. Figure 2 on page 30 illustrates how the cost of a crosspoint router increases approximately as a square law (note, this also applies to the physical size), and Figure 3 on the same page shows how the percentage of actual bandwidth used at any one time in the router follows an inverse trend. A Network routing So how does this compare with a network? A network consists of interconnected components or circuits, or in computing terms, it’s a system that delivers a means of transferring data between devices. This is in essence what the crosspoint router does, so does a network offer us an alternative means of performing this task, and are there any benefits? Almost certainly there are no network topologies that follow the same cost and bandwidth curves shown in Figures 2 and 3. Therefore, there is a potential saving to be made by better use of a system’s available bandwidth. In a crosspoint router, as a switch is provided for every possible route, the system bandwidth is related to the number of crosspoints, which is the number of inputs multiplied by the number of outputs. In a network router, the bandwidth only needs to be related to the number of inputs. So the cost of a network router increases in a linear fashion, as opposed to the square law of the crosspoint topology. Media networks distribute information by switching packets of data. However, the packetization and switching of individual packets requires data processing at the network nodes, which introduces some form of delay within the network. What these delays might be and how they can be managed are key factors when considering the real-time distribution of video. Benefits of network routing There are two potential benefits of network routing. One is that it is truly format and signal agnostic, because the packets of data can be coded representations of whatever we choose. This allows our switching infrastructure to support video, audio and other signals. With a crosspoint router, the electrical characteristics of different signal types have typically meant separate routers for each. 28 broadcastengineeringworld.com | February 2009 http://www.broadcastengineeringworld.com
Table of Contents Feed for the Digital Edition of Broadcast Engineering - February 2009 Broadcast Engineering - February 2009 Contents Viewing the Slowdown in 3-D Examine Workflows Tapeless Technology Digital Audio 24p and 25p Judder Video Routing: A Look at What's Next Managing AFD The Right Connections Solid State Logic's AWS 900+ SE and More... Advertisers Index Broadcast Engineering - February 2009 Broadcast Engineering - February 2009 - Broadcast Engineering - February 2009 (Page Cover1) Broadcast Engineering - February 2009 - Broadcast Engineering - February 2009 (Page Cover2) Broadcast Engineering - February 2009 - Broadcast Engineering - February 2009 (Page 3) Broadcast Engineering - February 2009 - Contents (Page 4) Broadcast Engineering - February 2009 - Contents (Page 5) Broadcast Engineering - February 2009 - Contents (Page 6) Broadcast Engineering - February 2009 - Contents (Page 7) Broadcast Engineering - February 2009 - Viewing the Slowdown in 3-D (Page 8) Broadcast Engineering - February 2009 - Viewing the Slowdown in 3-D (Page 9) Broadcast Engineering - February 2009 - Examine Workflows (Page 10) Broadcast Engineering - February 2009 - Examine Workflows (Page 11) Broadcast Engineering - February 2009 - Examine Workflows (Page 12) Broadcast Engineering - February 2009 - Examine Workflows (Page 13) Broadcast Engineering - February 2009 - Tapeless Technology (Page 14) Broadcast Engineering - February 2009 - Tapeless Technology (Page 15) Broadcast Engineering - February 2009 - Tapeless Technology (Page 16) Broadcast Engineering - February 2009 - Tapeless Technology (Page 17) Broadcast Engineering - February 2009 - Tapeless Technology (Page 18) Broadcast Engineering - February 2009 - Tapeless Technology (Page 19) Broadcast Engineering - February 2009 - Digital Audio (Page 20) Broadcast Engineering - February 2009 - Digital Audio (Page 21) Broadcast Engineering - February 2009 - Digital Audio (Page 22) Broadcast Engineering - February 2009 - Digital Audio (Page 23) Broadcast Engineering - February 2009 - 24p and 25p Judder (Page 24) Broadcast Engineering - February 2009 - 24p and 25p Judder (Page 25) Broadcast Engineering - February 2009 - 24p and 25p Judder (Page 26) Broadcast Engineering - February 2009 - 24p and 25p Judder (Page 27) Broadcast Engineering - February 2009 - Video Routing: A Look at What's Next (Page 28) Broadcast Engineering - February 2009 - Video Routing: A Look at What's Next (Page 29) Broadcast Engineering - February 2009 - Video Routing: A Look at What's Next (Page 30) Broadcast Engineering - February 2009 - Video Routing: A Look at What's Next (Page 31) Broadcast Engineering - February 2009 - Video Routing: A Look at What's Next (Page 32) Broadcast Engineering - February 2009 - Video Routing: A Look at What's Next (Page 33) Broadcast Engineering - February 2009 - Managing AFD (Page 34) Broadcast Engineering - February 2009 - Managing AFD (Page 35) Broadcast Engineering - February 2009 - Managing AFD (Page 36) Broadcast Engineering - February 2009 - Managing AFD (Page 37) Broadcast Engineering - February 2009 - The Right Connections (Page 38) Broadcast Engineering - February 2009 - The Right Connections (Page 39) Broadcast Engineering - February 2009 - Solid State Logic's AWS 900+ SE and More... (Page 40) Broadcast Engineering - February 2009 - Solid State Logic's AWS 900+ SE and More... (Page 41) Broadcast Engineering - February 2009 - Advertisers Index (Page 42) Broadcast Engineering - February 2009 - Advertisers Index (Page Cover3) Broadcast Engineering - February 2009 - Advertisers Index (Page Cover4)
For optimal viewing of this digital publication, please enable JavaScript and then refresh the page. If you would like to try to load the digital publication without using Flash Player detection, please click here.