Chemical Processing - February 2008 - (Page 17) Thanks to their nanodimensional pores, MOFs can store energy-rich gases such as natural gas. Because the nanocubes also store hydrogen, they could have a future use as energy sources for electronic devices. Then there are the next-generation sources for illumination — organic light-emitting diodes (OLED). BASF scientists reckon that they require only half as much energy as conventional energy-saving light bulbs. Some of the company’s nanotechnology developments already have reached the marketplace. For instance, the latest Audi A4 and A5 automobiles feature its Ultradur High Speed nanotechnology-based engineering plastic in their door control devices. The material was chosen because of its low warpage, which ensures a rigid housing, while good flowability allows simple injection molding (Figure 1). Similarly, the firm has just launched its first three Ultramid High Speed products. Filled with glass fiber or mineral nanoparticles, they are said to exhibit marked improvements in flow properties and much better resistance to heat aging at high temperatures (Figure 2). U.S. companies need more information and guidance from suppliers, trade associations, government regulatory bodies and others to effectively manage risks. BASF treats risk assessment as a crucial aspect of its research. “Safety research parallel to the dynamic development of the nanosciences is essential for their sustainable use,” explained Rüdiger Iden, the company’s spokesman for nanotechnology. So, the company is involved in a number of German and wider European projects considering the safety of nanotechnologies. Lack of guidance The Project on Emerging Nanotechnologies (PEN), Washington, D.C., undoubtedly is pleased that EHS issues are so high on the NNI agenda. Launched in 2005 by the Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars and The Pew Charitable Trusts, PEN is dedicated to helping business, government and the public anticipate and manage possible EHS implications of nanotechnology. Last December PEN released the results of a survey of New England-based nanotechnology companies aimed at discovering how firms in almost every sector of the economy address the possible EHS impacts of new nanoscale materials and products. The survey indicated that as nanotech industrial and consumer applications enter the market, U.S. companies need more information and guidance from suppliers, trade associations, government regulatory bodies and others to effectively manage risks. www.chemicalprocessing.com “Many smaller firms recognize the need to address risks proactively but few have the resources to do so. At present, the majority of survey participants expect to rely on suppliers to provide nanomaterial risk management information in the form of Materials Safety Data Sheets (MSDSs). But these do not always reflect the latest health and safety information, and regulatory or consensus guidance for these new materials is lacking,” noted John Lindberg of the University of Massachusetts Lowell, Mass., the study’s principal investigator. David Rejeski, director of PEN, expanded on this important problem: “The current MSDS for carbon nanotubes sold over the Internet treats them as graphite — the same material used in pencils — despite nanotubes bearing no more than a passing resemblance to this material. Clearly, companies are not being given the guidance they need. The findings from this study are consistent with other surveys of nanotech businesses in California, New York and around the world. Firms are flying somewhat blind into the future and need a clear set of rules, a sense of the emerging regulatory landscape and access to relevant research on risks in order to ensure both nanotechnology safety and profits.” In an earlier (August) report, PEN also called for initiatives to tackle the low level of awareness generally among the U.S. public. “Even though the number of nanotechnology-enabled consumer products — from dietary supplements to skin products to electronic devices — has more than doubled to over 500 products since 2006, the ‘needle’ on public awareness of nanotechology remains stuck at disappointingly low levels,” warned Rejeski. “Efforts to inform the public have not kept pace with the growth of this new technology area. This increases >> Superior spiral Figure 2. Polymer filled with glass fiber or mineral nanoparticles better resists heat aging at high temperatures. Source: BASF. February 2008 • 17 http://www.chemicalprocessing.com
Table of Contents Feed for the Digital Edition of Chemical Processing - February 2008 Chemical Processing - February 2008 Contents From the Editor ChemicalProcessing.com Field Notes In Process Energy Saver Compliance Advisor Nanoparticle Safety Raises Questions Take the Pressure Off Vacuum Systems Achieve Optimum Centrifugal Pump Performance Rethink Batch-Manufacturing Alarm Systems Dr. Gooddata Orlando Plant Pioneers HMI Migration Strategy Process Puzzler Plant InSites Equipment & Services Ad Index Product Spotlight/Classifieds End Point Chemical Processing - February 2008 Chemical Processing - February 2008 - Chemical Processing - February 2008 (Page Cover1) Chemical Processing - February 2008 - Chemical Processing - February 2008 (Page Cover2) Chemical Processing - February 2008 - Chemical Processing - February 2008 (Page 3) Chemical Processing - February 2008 - Chemical Processing - February 2008 (Page 4) Chemical Processing - February 2008 - Contents (Page 5) Chemical Processing - February 2008 - Contents (Page 6) Chemical Processing - February 2008 - From the Editor (Page 7) Chemical Processing - February 2008 - ChemicalProcessing.com (Page 8) Chemical Processing - February 2008 - Field Notes (Page 9) Chemical Processing - February 2008 - In Process (Page 10) Chemical Processing - February 2008 - In Process (Page 11) Chemical Processing - February 2008 - Energy Saver (Page 12) Chemical Processing - February 2008 - Compliance Advisor (Page 13) Chemical Processing - February 2008 - Nanoparticle Safety Raises Questions (Page 14) Chemical Processing - February 2008 - Nanoparticle Safety Raises Questions (Page 15) Chemical Processing - February 2008 - Nanoparticle Safety Raises Questions (Page 16) Chemical Processing - February 2008 - Nanoparticle Safety Raises Questions (Page 17) Chemical Processing - February 2008 - Nanoparticle Safety Raises Questions (Page 18) Chemical Processing - February 2008 - Nanoparticle Safety Raises Questions (Page 19) Chemical Processing - February 2008 - Take the Pressure Off Vacuum Systems (Page 20) Chemical Processing - February 2008 - Take the Pressure Off Vacuum Systems (Page 21) Chemical Processing - February 2008 - Take the Pressure Off Vacuum Systems (Page 22) Chemical Processing - February 2008 - Take the Pressure Off Vacuum Systems (Page 23) Chemical Processing - February 2008 - Achieve Optimum Centrifugal Pump Performance (Page 24) Chemical Processing - February 2008 - Achieve Optimum Centrifugal Pump Performance (Page 25) Chemical Processing - February 2008 - Achieve Optimum Centrifugal Pump Performance (Page 26) Chemical Processing - February 2008 - Achieve Optimum Centrifugal Pump Performance (Page 27) Chemical Processing - February 2008 - Achieve Optimum Centrifugal Pump Performance (Page 28) Chemical Processing - February 2008 - Rethink Batch-Manufacturing Alarm Systems (Page 29) Chemical Processing - February 2008 - Rethink Batch-Manufacturing Alarm Systems (Page 30) Chemical Processing - February 2008 - Rethink Batch-Manufacturing Alarm Systems (Page 31) Chemical Processing - February 2008 - Rethink Batch-Manufacturing Alarm Systems (Page 32) Chemical Processing - February 2008 - Rethink Batch-Manufacturing Alarm Systems (Page 33) Chemical Processing - February 2008 - Rethink Batch-Manufacturing Alarm Systems (Page 34) Chemical Processing - February 2008 - Rethink Batch-Manufacturing Alarm Systems (Page 35) Chemical Processing - February 2008 - Rethink Batch-Manufacturing Alarm Systems (Page 36) Chemical Processing - February 2008 - Dr. Gooddata (Page 37) Chemical Processing - February 2008 - Dr. Gooddata (Page 38) Chemical Processing - February 2008 - Orlando Plant Pioneers HMI Migration Strategy (Page 39) Chemical Processing - February 2008 - Orlando Plant Pioneers HMI Migration Strategy (Page 40) Chemical Processing - February 2008 - Process Puzzler (Page 41) Chemical Processing - February 2008 - Process Puzzler (Page 42) Chemical Processing - February 2008 - Plant InSites (Page 43) Chemical Processing - February 2008 - Plant InSites (Page 44) Chemical Processing - February 2008 - Equipment & Services (Page 45) Chemical Processing - February 2008 - Ad Index (Page 46) Chemical Processing - February 2008 - Product Spotlight/Classifieds (Page 47) Chemical Processing - February 2008 - Product Spotlight/Classifieds (Page 48) Chemical Processing - February 2008 - Product Spotlight/Classifieds (Page 49) Chemical Processing - February 2008 - End Point (Page 50) Chemical Processing - February 2008 - End Point (Page Cover3) Chemical Processing - February 2008 - End Point (Page Cover4)
For optimal viewing of this digital publication, please enable JavaScript and then refresh the page. If you would like to try to load the digital publication without using Flash Player detection, please click here.