Chemical Processing - April 2008 - (Page 33) turbulent energy dissipation may become more signi cant. Although scale-up using values of shear rate and tip speed work well in some applications involving agitators and stirrers, they aren’t necessarily always applicable to rotor/stators. The reason is that the ow from the workhead is assumed to travel at the same speed as the rotor tip. It then undergoes a sudden slowdown as it impacts the stator wall; the losses in kinetic energy during this process (hydraulic shear) contribute to functions such as dispersion and emulsi cation. Therefore, the tip speed in combination with the rotor/stator geometry (and physical properties of the uids) will have a more signi cant bearing on scale-up issues than tip speed alone. These factors combined form another parameter, called the shear frequency (sf), that is commonly employed in these calculations. Shear frequency. The interaction between the ow from the rotor and the geometry of the stator screen plays a critical role in the turbulence and shear characteristic in the gap. CFD models (High Shear Mixing Program, University of Maryland) indicate that the high energy dissipation regions (energy contributed to mixing) occur when the rotor passes a hole or a slot in the stator or screen. The way the uid impinges on the stator wall and the resultant turbulent eddies that occur therefore are governed by the number of holes/slots and the number of blades/teeth on the rotor. This is the reason for the variety of stator hole designs ranging from circles (Figure 3) to slots to squares that are available. Each of these holes imparts a distinctive mixing characteristic in terms of ow through the head and shear rate. Figure 4 shows how different stator geometries affected particle size distribution, in this case in trials with a titanium dioxide slurry. Lee et al. in a 2004 article “Rotor-stator milling of APIs…” in American Pharmaceutical Review discussed their use of shear frequency as a scale-up option in wet milling applications. When studying the milling of active pharmaceutical ingredients, they found that the shear frequency doesn’t affect the minimum achievable particle size but that it aids the rate of particle size reduction. >> Impact of stator geometry Figure 4. Titanium dioxide slurries from square hole high shear screen (red line) and slotted head (light blue line) differ in particle size distribution from control sample (dark blue line). www.chemicalprocessing.com http://www.westernstates.com http://www.intersystems.net http://www.chemicalprocessing.com
Table of Contents Feed for the Digital Edition of Chemical Processing - April 2008 Chemical Processing - April 2008 Contents From the Editor ChemicalProcessing.com Field Notes In Process Energy Saver Compliance Advisor Is It a Tragedy or Comedy for Engineers? Better Understanding Boosts Mixer Scale-up Don't Err With Air Compressors Control Performance Supervision Enhances Revamp Process Puzzler Plant InSites Equipment & Services Product Spotlight/Classifieds Ad Index End Point Chemical Processing - April 2008 Chemical Processing - April 2008 - Chemical Processing - April 2008 (Page Cover1) Chemical Processing - April 2008 - Chemical Processing - April 2008 (Page Cover2) Chemical Processing - April 2008 - Chemical Processing - April 2008 (Page 3) Chemical Processing - April 2008 - Chemical Processing - April 2008 (Page 4) Chemical Processing - April 2008 - Contents (Page 5) Chemical Processing - April 2008 - Contents (Page 6) Chemical Processing - April 2008 - From the Editor (Page 7) Chemical Processing - April 2008 - From the Editor (Page 8) Chemical Processing - April 2008 - ChemicalProcessing.com (Page 9) Chemical Processing - April 2008 - ChemicalProcessing.com (Page 10) Chemical Processing - April 2008 - Field Notes (Page 11) Chemical Processing - April 2008 - Field Notes (Page 12) Chemical Processing - April 2008 - In Process (Page 13) Chemical Processing - April 2008 - In Process (Page 14) Chemical Processing - April 2008 - In Process (Page 15) Chemical Processing - April 2008 - In Process (Page 16) Chemical Processing - April 2008 - Energy Saver (Page 17) Chemical Processing - April 2008 - Energy Saver (Page 18) Chemical Processing - April 2008 - Compliance Advisor (Page 19) Chemical Processing - April 2008 - Is It a Tragedy or Comedy for Engineers? (Page 20) Chemical Processing - April 2008 - Is It a Tragedy or Comedy for Engineers? (Page 21) Chemical Processing - April 2008 - Is It a Tragedy or Comedy for Engineers? (Page 22) Chemical Processing - April 2008 - Is It a Tragedy or Comedy for Engineers? (Page 23) Chemical Processing - April 2008 - Is It a Tragedy or Comedy for Engineers? (Page 24) Chemical Processing - April 2008 - Is It a Tragedy or Comedy for Engineers? (Page 25) Chemical Processing - April 2008 - Is It a Tragedy or Comedy for Engineers? (Page 26) Chemical Processing - April 2008 - Is It a Tragedy or Comedy for Engineers? (Page 27) Chemical Processing - April 2008 - Better Understanding Boosts Mixer Scale-up (Page 28) Chemical Processing - April 2008 - Better Understanding Boosts Mixer Scale-up (Page 29) Chemical Processing - April 2008 - Better Understanding Boosts Mixer Scale-up (Page 30) Chemical Processing - April 2008 - Better Understanding Boosts Mixer Scale-up (Page 31) Chemical Processing - April 2008 - Better Understanding Boosts Mixer Scale-up (Page 32) Chemical Processing - April 2008 - Better Understanding Boosts Mixer Scale-up (Page 33) Chemical Processing - April 2008 - Better Understanding Boosts Mixer Scale-up (Page 34) Chemical Processing - April 2008 - Better Understanding Boosts Mixer Scale-up (Page 35) Chemical Processing - April 2008 - Don't Err With Air Compressors (Page 36) Chemical Processing - April 2008 - Don't Err With Air Compressors (Page 37) Chemical Processing - April 2008 - Don't Err With Air Compressors (Page 38) Chemical Processing - April 2008 - Don't Err With Air Compressors (Page 39) Chemical Processing - April 2008 - Don't Err With Air Compressors (Page 40) Chemical Processing - April 2008 - Control Performance Supervision Enhances Revamp (Page 41) Chemical Processing - April 2008 - Control Performance Supervision Enhances Revamp (Page 42) Chemical Processing - April 2008 - Control Performance Supervision Enhances Revamp (Page 43) Chemical Processing - April 2008 - Control Performance Supervision Enhances Revamp (Page 44) Chemical Processing - April 2008 - Process Puzzler (Page 45) Chemical Processing - April 2008 - Process Puzzler (Page 46) Chemical Processing - April 2008 - Process Puzzler (Page 47) Chemical Processing - April 2008 - Plant InSites (Page 48) Chemical Processing - April 2008 - Equipment & Services (Page 49) Chemical Processing - April 2008 - Equipment & Services (Page 50) Chemical Processing - April 2008 - Equipment & Services (Page 51) Chemical Processing - April 2008 - Product Spotlight/Classifieds (Page 52) Chemical Processing - April 2008 - Product Spotlight/Classifieds (Page 53) Chemical Processing - April 2008 - Product Spotlight/Classifieds (Page 54) Chemical Processing - April 2008 - Product Spotlight/Classifieds (Page 55) Chemical Processing - April 2008 - Product Spotlight/Classifieds (Page 56) Chemical Processing - April 2008 - Ad Index (Page 57) Chemical Processing - April 2008 - End Point (Page 58) Chemical Processing - April 2008 - End Point (Page Cover3) Chemical Processing - April 2008 - End Point (Page Cover4)
For optimal viewing of this digital publication, please enable JavaScript and then refresh the page. If you would like to try to load the digital publication without using Flash Player detection, please click here.