Chemical Processing - June 2008 - (Page 13) in process the process up. We hope to have all the necessary data in about a year’s time,” he notes. At that time, pilotplant trials for both batch and continuous flow modes should begin, he says. “We are looking at establishing a spin-out company to further the development of the process. If pilot plant studies are successful, we would hope to move to a demonstration facility within the next few years,” says North. In industrial implementation, he foresees plant flue gases being piped directly to a continuous reactor. “Our technology would be just another module added onto the back of an existing power station, alongside NOx and SOx extractors, etc.” What factor most strongly influences you when considering a new job? 40.0 35.0 30.0 25.0 Responses (%) 20.0 15.0 10.0 5.0 0.0 Position’s responsibilities and challenges Job security/employer stability Other Location Salary and benefits A sO-CAlled polymer of intrinsic microporosity (PIM), whose structure resembles crispy noodles, incorporated into a composite membrane with a synthetic catalyst may provide more effective removal of carbon dioxide from flue gases. That’s the hope of Peter Budd, a materials chemist at the Organic Materials Innovation Centre of the University of Manchester, Manchester, U.K. He has received a £150,000 (the equivalent of about $300,000) grant from the U.K.’s Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council to conduct a feasibility study. “The essential idea we are testing is that it should be possible to greatly increase the selectivity of a membrane for CO2 by incorporating a synthetic material that behaves in a similar way to carbonic anhydrase. Carbonic anhydrases are a family of enzymes that catalyze the reversible hydration of CO2 to bicarbonate,” Budd explains. “When the polymer is used as a gas separation membrane, it has a very high permeability to CO2, and also a high selectivity for CO2 over, for example, N2 or CH4. However, for a membrane system that will significantly outperform other technologies, a substantial increase in selectivity is required over that achievable with a polymer alone. The feasibility study is to test the idea of incorporating a catalytic component that will encourage selective transport of CO2 from a gas mixture into an aqueous phase, then from that aqueous phase into a stream of pure gas.” Budd foresees significant advantages for this approach over alternative CO2-removal technologies such as absorption, pressure-swing adsorption and cryogenic separation. “…A membrane process, if a sufficiently selective membrane system can be developed, arguably offers the greatest potential for costeffective and energy-efficient separation.” Should the study prove favorable, piloting is several years away, he adds. Polymer promises better CO2 removal More respondents say salary and benefits are most important, but only by a small margin. To participate in this month’s poll, go to ChemicalProcessing.com. Need a Separations Specialist? Call Kuhni. In Kuhni, you’ll find a global partner offering innovative, high performance process systems featuring higher efficiency, more scaleable thermal and liquidextraction separation technologies such as: • Rombopak® structured tower packing • Kuhni Slit Trays • Kuhni Extraction Columns • Kuhni Film Evaporators Plus we offer engineering services as well as complete separations systems with process guarantees. To learn more, visit our new web site at www.kuhni.us. Kuhni USA Inc. PO Box 308 Stanley NC 28164 tel +1704 675 5405 fax +1 704 675 5419 email contact@kuhni.us internet www.kuhni.us http://ChemicalProcessing.com http://www.kuhni.us http://www.kuhni.us
Table of Contents Feed for the Digital Edition of Chemical Processing - June 2008 Chemical Processing - June 2008 Contents From the Editor ChemicalProcessing.com Field Notes In Process Energy Saver Compliance Advisor Achieve Model Operations Bolster Your Condition Monitoring Toolbox Particle Analysis Makes Solid Progress Improve Batch Reactor Temperature Control Improve Your Job Security Plant InSites Process Puzzler Equipment & Services Product Spotlight/Classifieds Ad Index End Point Chemical Processing - June 2008 Chemical Processing - June 2008 - Chemical Processing - June 2008 (Page Cover1) Chemical Processing - June 2008 - Chemical Processing - June 2008 (Page Cover2) Chemical Processing - June 2008 - Chemical Processing - June 2008 (Page 3) Chemical Processing - June 2008 - Chemical Processing - June 2008 (Page 4) Chemical Processing - June 2008 - Contents (Page 5) Chemical Processing - June 2008 - Contents (Page 6) Chemical Processing - June 2008 - From the Editor (Page 7) Chemical Processing - June 2008 - From the Editor (Page 8) Chemical Processing - June 2008 - ChemicalProcessing.com (Page 9) Chemical Processing - June 2008 - ChemicalProcessing.com (Page 10) Chemical Processing - June 2008 - Field Notes (Page 11) Chemical Processing - June 2008 - In Process (Page 12) Chemical Processing - June 2008 - In Process (Page 13) Chemical Processing - June 2008 - In Process (Page 14) Chemical Processing - June 2008 - Energy Saver (Page 15) Chemical Processing - June 2008 - Energy Saver (Page 16) Chemical Processing - June 2008 - Compliance Advisor (Page 17) Chemical Processing - June 2008 - Achieve Model Operations (Page 18) Chemical Processing - June 2008 - Achieve Model Operations (Page 19) Chemical Processing - June 2008 - Achieve Model Operations (Page 20) Chemical Processing - June 2008 - Achieve Model Operations (Page 21) Chemical Processing - June 2008 - Achieve Model Operations (Page 22) Chemical Processing - June 2008 - Bolster Your Condition Monitoring Toolbox (Page 23) Chemical Processing - June 2008 - Bolster Your Condition Monitoring Toolbox (Page 24) Chemical Processing - June 2008 - Bolster Your Condition Monitoring Toolbox (Page 25) Chemical Processing - June 2008 - Bolster Your Condition Monitoring Toolbox (Page 26) Chemical Processing - June 2008 - Bolster Your Condition Monitoring Toolbox (Page 27) Chemical Processing - June 2008 - Bolster Your Condition Monitoring Toolbox (Page 28) Chemical Processing - June 2008 - Particle Analysis Makes Solid Progress (Page 29) Chemical Processing - June 2008 - Particle Analysis Makes Solid Progress (Page 30) Chemical Processing - June 2008 - Particle Analysis Makes Solid Progress (Page 31) Chemical Processing - June 2008 - Particle Analysis Makes Solid Progress (Page 32) Chemical Processing - June 2008 - Improve Batch Reactor Temperature Control (Page 33) Chemical Processing - June 2008 - Improve Batch Reactor Temperature Control (Page 34) Chemical Processing - June 2008 - Improve Batch Reactor Temperature Control (Page 35) Chemical Processing - June 2008 - Improve Batch Reactor Temperature Control (Page 36) Chemical Processing - June 2008 - Improve Batch Reactor Temperature Control (Page 37) Chemical Processing - June 2008 - Improve Your Job Security (Page 38) Chemical Processing - June 2008 - Improve Your Job Security (Page 39) Chemical Processing - June 2008 - Improve Your Job Security (Page 40) Chemical Processing - June 2008 - Improve Your Job Security (Page 41) Chemical Processing - June 2008 - Plant InSites (Page 42) Chemical Processing - June 2008 - Process Puzzler (Page 43) Chemical Processing - June 2008 - Process Puzzler (Page 44) Chemical Processing - June 2008 - Equipment & Services (Page 45) Chemical Processing - June 2008 - Product Spotlight/Classifieds (Page 46) Chemical Processing - June 2008 - Product Spotlight/Classifieds (Page 47) Chemical Processing - June 2008 - Product Spotlight/Classifieds (Page 48) Chemical Processing - June 2008 - Ad Index (Page 49) Chemical Processing - June 2008 - End Point (Page 50) Chemical Processing - June 2008 - End Point (Page Cover3) Chemical Processing - June 2008 - End Point (Page Cover4)
For optimal viewing of this digital publication, please enable JavaScript and then refresh the page. If you would like to try to load the digital publication without using Flash Player detection, please click here.