Chemical Processing - June 2008 - (Page 36) 10 0 600 1,200 1,800 Time, sec 2,400 3,000 3,600 Case 2 Reactor temperature and output, ˚C or the time required for a new f luid mixture to pass from the 75 100 Temperature PV control valve to the measuring Reactor set point 70 90 element. Minimize this dead 65 80 time by appropriate sensor loca60 70 tion and by installing a circulatUse steam 55 60 ing pump as shown in Figure 1. Also, the effect of filters added 50 50 in the transmitter or the conUse chilled water 45 40 troller may look like dead time 40 30 to the PID algorithm. In the Jacket controller output 35 20 reactor loop, we minimize dead 30 10 time by getting the fastest linear Add final ingredient response of the jacket loop, in25 0 cluding allowing one overshoot 0 5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 on the jacket set-point response. Time, sec Process dynamics is a model of the shape and size of the PV Figure 3. Oscillation response to output changes, which we need to Linear means the process temperature PV reoccurred during set-point step on a sponds consistently regardless of the size, direction optimally tune the controller. For most loops this 40,000-L reactor with can’t be calculated before construction and is most or history of the controller output changes. In the the reactor loop in conveniently determined from step tests with the jacket loop, achieving linearity requires selecting auto and the jacket loop in cascade; a controller in manual. The process dynamics can appropriate control valves and minimizing nonload disturbance be manually calculated from trend charts or time linearities in the control strategy, e.g., dead zones (exothermic reaction) also took place. series data acquired from an OPC server or, in in the split range logic. Figure 5 shows another example of nonlinearity: on the heating step, after the some cases, automatically by software running in the DCS. The two simplest types of process initial overshoot, recovery to 50° C was extremely dynamics are: slow due to the control-valve flow characteristic. • self-regulating processes (those that eventually Sometimes the limiting nonlinearity is in the settle at a new value during manual step tests); and utilities supplying the jacket, e.g., a steam-header • integrating processes (those that ramp at varipressure control loop. In the reactor loop, linearity ous slopes during manual step tests). means getting symmetrical set-point responses from The tests to measure these process dynamics the jacket. If the cooling and heating responses of Jacket (Slave) Reactor (Master) the jacket are asymmetrical (as in FigCase 3 SP ure 5 or for steam versus cold water), SP From operator SP TIC TIC limits or batch recipe OUT OUT consider a gain scheduling controller PV 60 PV to compensate. This doesn’t require any special coding because it can be Cooling TT Reactor temperature 55 Temperature set point Controller output, °C TY easily configured by drag-drop-andHeating tune in modern control systems. 50 Dead time is the time measured 45 from an output change before Heating/Cooling Temperature PV anything happens on the PV. It’s fluid supply 40 inherently destabilizing in a feedback control loop. In the jacket, one 35 cause of dead time is transport delay Reactor temperature, °C 30 25 0 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 5,000 6,000 7,000 8,000 Jacket inlet temperature Figure 4. Response was far too slow for a setTT point step on a 3,600-L reactor with the reactor loop in auto and the jacket loop in cascade. Jacket controller output, % Time, sec SP is the controller set point PV is the measurement process variable JUNE 2008 OUT is the controller output chEmicalprocEssiNg.com 36 http://chemicalprocessing.com
Table of Contents Feed for the Digital Edition of Chemical Processing - June 2008 Chemical Processing - June 2008 Contents From the Editor ChemicalProcessing.com Field Notes In Process Energy Saver Compliance Advisor Achieve Model Operations Bolster Your Condition Monitoring Toolbox Particle Analysis Makes Solid Progress Improve Batch Reactor Temperature Control Improve Your Job Security Plant InSites Process Puzzler Equipment & Services Product Spotlight/Classifieds Ad Index End Point Chemical Processing - June 2008 Chemical Processing - June 2008 - Chemical Processing - June 2008 (Page Cover1) Chemical Processing - June 2008 - Chemical Processing - June 2008 (Page Cover2) Chemical Processing - June 2008 - Chemical Processing - June 2008 (Page 3) Chemical Processing - June 2008 - Chemical Processing - June 2008 (Page 4) Chemical Processing - June 2008 - Contents (Page 5) Chemical Processing - June 2008 - Contents (Page 6) Chemical Processing - June 2008 - From the Editor (Page 7) Chemical Processing - June 2008 - From the Editor (Page 8) Chemical Processing - June 2008 - ChemicalProcessing.com (Page 9) Chemical Processing - June 2008 - ChemicalProcessing.com (Page 10) Chemical Processing - June 2008 - Field Notes (Page 11) Chemical Processing - June 2008 - In Process (Page 12) Chemical Processing - June 2008 - In Process (Page 13) Chemical Processing - June 2008 - In Process (Page 14) Chemical Processing - June 2008 - Energy Saver (Page 15) Chemical Processing - June 2008 - Energy Saver (Page 16) Chemical Processing - June 2008 - Compliance Advisor (Page 17) Chemical Processing - June 2008 - Achieve Model Operations (Page 18) Chemical Processing - June 2008 - Achieve Model Operations (Page 19) Chemical Processing - June 2008 - Achieve Model Operations (Page 20) Chemical Processing - June 2008 - Achieve Model Operations (Page 21) Chemical Processing - June 2008 - Achieve Model Operations (Page 22) Chemical Processing - June 2008 - Bolster Your Condition Monitoring Toolbox (Page 23) Chemical Processing - June 2008 - Bolster Your Condition Monitoring Toolbox (Page 24) Chemical Processing - June 2008 - Bolster Your Condition Monitoring Toolbox (Page 25) Chemical Processing - June 2008 - Bolster Your Condition Monitoring Toolbox (Page 26) Chemical Processing - June 2008 - Bolster Your Condition Monitoring Toolbox (Page 27) Chemical Processing - June 2008 - Bolster Your Condition Monitoring Toolbox (Page 28) Chemical Processing - June 2008 - Particle Analysis Makes Solid Progress (Page 29) Chemical Processing - June 2008 - Particle Analysis Makes Solid Progress (Page 30) Chemical Processing - June 2008 - Particle Analysis Makes Solid Progress (Page 31) Chemical Processing - June 2008 - Particle Analysis Makes Solid Progress (Page 32) Chemical Processing - June 2008 - Improve Batch Reactor Temperature Control (Page 33) Chemical Processing - June 2008 - Improve Batch Reactor Temperature Control (Page 34) Chemical Processing - June 2008 - Improve Batch Reactor Temperature Control (Page 35) Chemical Processing - June 2008 - Improve Batch Reactor Temperature Control (Page 36) Chemical Processing - June 2008 - Improve Batch Reactor Temperature Control (Page 37) Chemical Processing - June 2008 - Improve Your Job Security (Page 38) Chemical Processing - June 2008 - Improve Your Job Security (Page 39) Chemical Processing - June 2008 - Improve Your Job Security (Page 40) Chemical Processing - June 2008 - Improve Your Job Security (Page 41) Chemical Processing - June 2008 - Plant InSites (Page 42) Chemical Processing - June 2008 - Process Puzzler (Page 43) Chemical Processing - June 2008 - Process Puzzler (Page 44) Chemical Processing - June 2008 - Equipment & Services (Page 45) Chemical Processing - June 2008 - Product Spotlight/Classifieds (Page 46) Chemical Processing - June 2008 - Product Spotlight/Classifieds (Page 47) Chemical Processing - June 2008 - Product Spotlight/Classifieds (Page 48) Chemical Processing - June 2008 - Ad Index (Page 49) Chemical Processing - June 2008 - End Point (Page 50) Chemical Processing - June 2008 - End Point (Page Cover3) Chemical Processing - June 2008 - End Point (Page Cover4)
For optimal viewing of this digital publication, please enable JavaScript and then refresh the page. If you would like to try to load the digital publication without using Flash Player detection, please click here.