Chemical Processing - June 2008 - (Page 37) Asymmetrical response in the control logic (for example, the SP limiter Controller ouput, % block in Figure 1), a non50 60 Use heater linear computer simulation can accelerate finding the 48 50 best controller parameters Jacket set point Use chilled fluid — today’s control systems 46 40 come with built-in simulation tools. In some cases 44 30 a Fuzzy Logic Controller 42 (FLC) can give control 20 superior to PID. When Jacket temperature PV 40 10 there’s no jacket but only electrical heating of the re38 0 actor, the FLC can provide 1,550 2,050 2,550 3,050 the fastest possible heating Time, sec of the reactor with no overshoot or oscillation. Again, the modern control system Figure 5. Jacket responded faster to cooling than heatmakes it easy to install this controller. also will reveal the nonlining as shown with reactor earities in the process. loop in manual and jacket loop in cascade mode. With a PID controller ACHIEVE BETTER CONTROL the type of process deterSome plants have experienced oscillatory or slugmines how to compensate gish response of batch reactor temperature. is for the process dynamics. For purely self-regulating can be caused by the integrating process response, processes we mainly use integral action in the con- limitations in the control system and lack of traintroller. For purely integrating processes we mainly ing. With a modern control system, a plant can set use proportional action. Derivative action normally up the controllers to give fast set-point response isn’t needed in the jacket controller but may be ap- without overshoot or oscillations. is off ers propriate in the reactor controller. the opportunity to maximize product quality, e Lambda tuning method is one way of minimize batch cycle time and eliminate utilichoosing the PID parameters to tune for the speed ties waste — all positive impacts on your plant’s required, without oscillation. For process dynamprofitability. ics that are purely self-regulating or integrating, simple algebraic tuning rules developed for MARK COUGHRAN is a senior process control consultant continuous processes [3] have proven applicable to for Emerson Process Management, Austin, Texas. E-mail him batch processes. ese rules can be taught to engi- at Mark.Coughran@Emerson.com. neers, technicians and operators as a time domain method — without the need to use Bode plots or transfer functions. We must observe the rule of cascade by tuning REFERENCES the jacket (slave) control loop fi rst and faster than 1. Process Control and Optimization, Volume the reactor (master) control loop. e Lambda VIII in “Instrument Engineers’ Handbook,” p. tuning method provides explicitly for tuning by the 1,664, 4th ed., B.G. Liptak, ed., CRC Press, cascade rule because we can set the response time Boca Raton, Fla. (2007). (λ) of each control loop as: 2. Boudreau, M.A. and G.K. McMillan, “New Diλjacket << λreactor rections in Bioprocess Modeling and Control,” More-advanced tools are helpful for some situp. 91, ISA, Research Triangle Park, N.C. (2007). ations. For instance, if the temperature process 3. Bialkowski, W.L., in “The Control Handbook,” response has elements of both self-regulating and p. 1,234, W. Levine, ed., CRC Press, Boca integrating dynamics, a different tuning rule is Raton, Fla. (1996). needed. When there’re significant nonlinearities 52 70 37 Jacket controller output, % Jacket temperature, °C CHEMICALPROCESSING.COM JUNE 2008 http://CHEMICALPROCESSING.COM
Table of Contents Feed for the Digital Edition of Chemical Processing - June 2008 Chemical Processing - June 2008 Contents From the Editor ChemicalProcessing.com Field Notes In Process Energy Saver Compliance Advisor Achieve Model Operations Bolster Your Condition Monitoring Toolbox Particle Analysis Makes Solid Progress Improve Batch Reactor Temperature Control Improve Your Job Security Plant InSites Process Puzzler Equipment & Services Product Spotlight/Classifieds Ad Index End Point Chemical Processing - June 2008 Chemical Processing - June 2008 - Chemical Processing - June 2008 (Page Cover1) Chemical Processing - June 2008 - Chemical Processing - June 2008 (Page Cover2) Chemical Processing - June 2008 - Chemical Processing - June 2008 (Page 3) Chemical Processing - June 2008 - Chemical Processing - June 2008 (Page 4) Chemical Processing - June 2008 - Contents (Page 5) Chemical Processing - June 2008 - Contents (Page 6) Chemical Processing - June 2008 - From the Editor (Page 7) Chemical Processing - June 2008 - From the Editor (Page 8) Chemical Processing - June 2008 - ChemicalProcessing.com (Page 9) Chemical Processing - June 2008 - ChemicalProcessing.com (Page 10) Chemical Processing - June 2008 - Field Notes (Page 11) Chemical Processing - June 2008 - In Process (Page 12) Chemical Processing - June 2008 - In Process (Page 13) Chemical Processing - June 2008 - In Process (Page 14) Chemical Processing - June 2008 - Energy Saver (Page 15) Chemical Processing - June 2008 - Energy Saver (Page 16) Chemical Processing - June 2008 - Compliance Advisor (Page 17) Chemical Processing - June 2008 - Achieve Model Operations (Page 18) Chemical Processing - June 2008 - Achieve Model Operations (Page 19) Chemical Processing - June 2008 - Achieve Model Operations (Page 20) Chemical Processing - June 2008 - Achieve Model Operations (Page 21) Chemical Processing - June 2008 - Achieve Model Operations (Page 22) Chemical Processing - June 2008 - Bolster Your Condition Monitoring Toolbox (Page 23) Chemical Processing - June 2008 - Bolster Your Condition Monitoring Toolbox (Page 24) Chemical Processing - June 2008 - Bolster Your Condition Monitoring Toolbox (Page 25) Chemical Processing - June 2008 - Bolster Your Condition Monitoring Toolbox (Page 26) Chemical Processing - June 2008 - Bolster Your Condition Monitoring Toolbox (Page 27) Chemical Processing - June 2008 - Bolster Your Condition Monitoring Toolbox (Page 28) Chemical Processing - June 2008 - Particle Analysis Makes Solid Progress (Page 29) Chemical Processing - June 2008 - Particle Analysis Makes Solid Progress (Page 30) Chemical Processing - June 2008 - Particle Analysis Makes Solid Progress (Page 31) Chemical Processing - June 2008 - Particle Analysis Makes Solid Progress (Page 32) Chemical Processing - June 2008 - Improve Batch Reactor Temperature Control (Page 33) Chemical Processing - June 2008 - Improve Batch Reactor Temperature Control (Page 34) Chemical Processing - June 2008 - Improve Batch Reactor Temperature Control (Page 35) Chemical Processing - June 2008 - Improve Batch Reactor Temperature Control (Page 36) Chemical Processing - June 2008 - Improve Batch Reactor Temperature Control (Page 37) Chemical Processing - June 2008 - Improve Your Job Security (Page 38) Chemical Processing - June 2008 - Improve Your Job Security (Page 39) Chemical Processing - June 2008 - Improve Your Job Security (Page 40) Chemical Processing - June 2008 - Improve Your Job Security (Page 41) Chemical Processing - June 2008 - Plant InSites (Page 42) Chemical Processing - June 2008 - Process Puzzler (Page 43) Chemical Processing - June 2008 - Process Puzzler (Page 44) Chemical Processing - June 2008 - Equipment & Services (Page 45) Chemical Processing - June 2008 - Product Spotlight/Classifieds (Page 46) Chemical Processing - June 2008 - Product Spotlight/Classifieds (Page 47) Chemical Processing - June 2008 - Product Spotlight/Classifieds (Page 48) Chemical Processing - June 2008 - Ad Index (Page 49) Chemical Processing - June 2008 - End Point (Page 50) Chemical Processing - June 2008 - End Point (Page Cover3) Chemical Processing - June 2008 - End Point (Page Cover4)
For optimal viewing of this digital publication, please enable JavaScript and then refresh the page. If you would like to try to load the digital publication without using Flash Player detection, please click here.