Chemical Processing - July 2008 - (Page 34) 5 50 55 60 Reference electrolyte contamination. e eluting of the reference electrolyte out of the reference diaphragm into the process to form an ionic cloud can lead to dissimilar ions in the reference electrolyte. When the junction potential is changing due to reference contamination, it will appear as a drift in pH. e solution to this ranges from using a different type of junction material, to multiple junction reference assemblies or a pressurized free-flowing reference/junction. Pseudo halide ions situation. When reduced sulfur or cyanide is present, with porous or open aperture junctions these pseudo halide ions migrate into the reference electrode, contaminate the reference electrolyte and combine with the elemental silver wire to form silver sulfide. Excessive sulfide ions may form a highly water insoluble silver sulfide coating on the wire. Using double junction reference electrodes (Figure 4) with KNO3 in the first reference chamber will help overcome the sulfide and cyanide ion problems. A potassium nitrate solution prevents the sulfide or cyanide ions from getting into KCl reference chamber. Solid state sensor. It’s possible to avoid glass issues by opting for a sensor based on the ion selective field effect transistor (ISFET), which was developed in the early 1970s. Such sensors particularly suit food and pharmaceutical processes. However, ISFET technology poses its own set of challenges. e sensor’s measuring surface is reduced to approximately a 2-mm-dia. circle. Processes with high suspended solids can create problems with this limited measuring surface area. Installing the sensor at a 45° angle to the process flow can Completing the circuit mitigate this situation. Signal transmission. Most sensors provide analog mV signals; such signals are susceptible to galvanic interference, which we’ll Glass electrode discuss shortly. It’s possible to avoid such Ag/AgCI problems by choosing KCI electrolyte a sensor that digitizes the signal before sending it to the analyzer. Figure 2. Most pH probes combine the two electrodes within a single glass body. Figure 5 shows such a sensor that uses our Memosens technology. ese sensors also feature an inductive coupling of the pH sensor and cable, allowing the data and power transmission to travel bidirectionally. THE PROCESS ENVIRONMENT Proper sensor selection is the key to long probe life and good performance. Combination pH probes are expected to respond very quickly, almost 90% of a pH step change in 10 seconds. is requires a constant free-flowing and pure reference electrolyte and a hydrated measuring glass. In choosing a sensor, you must consider process dynamics, conditions and surroundings. Factors to watch out for include: • coating of the glass membrane; • liquid junction plugging; • fluid velocity; • temperature and pressure of the measured fluid; • abrasion, drying and aging of the glass membrane; • galvanic isolation; • calibration and storage; and • hypoionic processes (low ionic strength). Let’s look at several of these. Coating. As the sensor remains in contact with process fluid, that fluid starts depositing onto the measuring glass surface. Periodic cleaning of the glass membrane with soap and water will remove such deposits. Automated cleaning and calibration systems are available and may be useful in explosion-proof locations or ones posing health hazards. Transmitter Reference electrode Ag/AgCI KCI electrolyte t t pH glass membrane diaphragm JULY 2008 CHEMICALPROCESSING.COM 34 http://chemicalprocessing.com
Table of Contents Feed for the Digital Edition of Chemical Processing - July 2008 Chemical Processing - July 2008 Contents From the Editor ChemicalProcessing.com Field Notes In Process Energy Saver Compliance Advisor Who’s a Big Hit? Succeed with Condensate Control Take Some Basic Steps with pH Measurements Steam Projects Provide Fast Payback Process Puzzler Plant InSites Equipment & Services Product Spotlight/Classifieds/Ad-Lits Ad Index End Point Chemical Processing - July 2008 Chemical Processing - July 2008 - Chemical Processing - July 2008 (Page Cover1) Chemical Processing - July 2008 - Chemical Processing - July 2008 (Page Cover2) Chemical Processing - July 2008 - Chemical Processing - July 2008 (Page 3) Chemical Processing - July 2008 - Chemical Processing - July 2008 (Page 4) Chemical Processing - July 2008 - Contents (Page 5) Chemical Processing - July 2008 - Contents (Page 6) Chemical Processing - July 2008 - From the Editor (Page 7) Chemical Processing - July 2008 - From the Editor (Page 8) Chemical Processing - July 2008 - ChemicalProcessing.com (Page 9) Chemical Processing - July 2008 - ChemicalProcessing.com (Page 10) Chemical Processing - July 2008 - Field Notes (Page 11) Chemical Processing - July 2008 - In Process (Page 12) Chemical Processing - July 2008 - In Process (Page 13) Chemical Processing - July 2008 - In Process (Page 14) Chemical Processing - July 2008 - Energy Saver (Page 15) Chemical Processing - July 2008 - Energy Saver (Page 16) Chemical Processing - July 2008 - Compliance Advisor (Page 17) Chemical Processing - July 2008 - Who’s a Big Hit? (Page 18) Chemical Processing - July 2008 - Who’s a Big Hit? (Page 19) Chemical Processing - July 2008 - Who’s a Big Hit? (Page 20) Chemical Processing - July 2008 - Who’s a Big Hit? (Page 21) Chemical Processing - July 2008 - Who’s a Big Hit? (Page 22) Chemical Processing - July 2008 - Who’s a Big Hit? (Page 23) Chemical Processing - July 2008 - Succeed with Condensate Control (Page 24) Chemical Processing - July 2008 - Succeed with Condensate Control (Page 25) Chemical Processing - July 2008 - Succeed with Condensate Control (Page 26) Chemical Processing - July 2008 - Succeed with Condensate Control (Page 27) Chemical Processing - July 2008 - Succeed with Condensate Control (Page 28) Chemical Processing - July 2008 - Succeed with Condensate Control (Page 29) Chemical Processing - July 2008 - Succeed with Condensate Control (Page 30) Chemical Processing - July 2008 - Succeed with Condensate Control (Page 31) Chemical Processing - July 2008 - Take Some Basic Steps with pH Measurements (Page 32) Chemical Processing - July 2008 - Take Some Basic Steps with pH Measurements (Page 33) Chemical Processing - July 2008 - Take Some Basic Steps with pH Measurements (Page 34) Chemical Processing - July 2008 - Take Some Basic Steps with pH Measurements (Page 35) Chemical Processing - July 2008 - Take Some Basic Steps with pH Measurements (Page 36) Chemical Processing - July 2008 - Take Some Basic Steps with pH Measurements (Page 37) Chemical Processing - July 2008 - Take Some Basic Steps with pH Measurements (Page 38) Chemical Processing - July 2008 - Steam Projects Provide Fast Payback (Page 39) Chemical Processing - July 2008 - Steam Projects Provide Fast Payback (Page 40) Chemical Processing - July 2008 - Process Puzzler (Page 41) Chemical Processing - July 2008 - Plant InSites (Page 42) Chemical Processing - July 2008 - Plant InSites (Page 43) Chemical Processing - July 2008 - Equipment & Services (Page 44) Chemical Processing - July 2008 - Equipment & Services (Page 45) Chemical Processing - July 2008 - Product Spotlight/Classifieds/Ad-Lits (Page 46) Chemical Processing - July 2008 - Product Spotlight/Classifieds/Ad-Lits (Page 47) Chemical Processing - July 2008 - Product Spotlight/Classifieds/Ad-Lits (Page 48) Chemical Processing - July 2008 - Ad Index (Page 49) Chemical Processing - July 2008 - End Point (Page 50) Chemical Processing - July 2008 - End Point (Page Cover3) Chemical Processing - July 2008 - End Point (Page Cover4)
For optimal viewing of this digital publication, please enable JavaScript and then refresh the page. If you would like to try to load the digital publication without using Flash Player detection, please click here.