Chemical Processing-August 2008 - (Page 36) thing by identifying and correcting variation outside what’s considered acceptable. Measuring the wrong things can undermine process safety. It’s unfortunate but true that personnel will behave contrary to reason and the best interest of the company if necessary to “make their numbers.” In the real world, some owner/operators essentially are following the old adage: “Measure with a caliper. Mark with a scribe. Cut with a chain saw.” Their process hazards analysis is becoming increasingly quantitative with more factors and modifiers, and the verification of risk reduction uses multiple significant digits — yet the mechanical integrity record simply states “failed.” The real world must come into balance because mechanical integrity data prove the risk reduction strategy. Risk reduction provided by a piece of equipment is the inverse of its probability of failure on demand (PFD), which is the number of times the ISS has failed dangerously divided by the total number of times the ISS has been challenged. Using probabilistic techniques, the PFDs of specific equipment can be calculated and compared to expectations [7]. The most important things cannot be measured [1]. Thus, PSM requires that quality be built into the design and management system. Validation and periodic proof testing demonstrate that the quality system is rigorous enough to exceed the required equipment integrity. Maintenance plans should consider how degraded equipment operation will be detected early, so it can be corrected before the equipment fails. Safety equipment must not be run to failure. The more that’s known about the equipment and what’s affecting its operation, the better the risk can be managed. For safety systems, knowledge that the equipment will operate as required is most important. To gain confidence in the equipment, perform periodic inspection and preventive maintenance to maintain it in “as good as new” condition. Proof tests provide an auditable means to demonstrate proper operation. Near-miss and incident investigations should evaluate any identified ISS inadequacy or failure. Track spurious trips and process demands and compare them with expectations from the hazard analysis. The Check phase involves monitoring equipment records and looking for trends indicating design or management gaps that need to be closed. Failure tracking is essential to close the safety lifecycle. Repeated failures likely indicate that the installed equipment isn’t capable of meeting performance requirements. Use root cause analysis to determine why metrics are trending in the wrong direction, then implement action plans to improve the management system, equipment, procedures and personnel training. Identify and communicate to personnel special and previously unknown causes of failure — to ensure that lessons learned aren’t hidden in mechanical integrity records. Use MOC processes to resolve performance gaps. Act What is a system? A system is a network of interdependent components that work together to try to accomplish the aim of the system. It must have an aim. Without an aim, there is no system. The aim must be clear to everyone in the system. The aim must include plans for the future. The aim is a value judgment [4]. Even when good people apply adequate theory and standards, there’re always lessons to be learned. The Act phase involves the actions taken in response to trends in metrics and continuous improvement opportunities. If an owner/operator’s safety culture shines here, risk will be driven as low as reasonably practicable. Continuous improvement is incorporated in PSM through “grandfathering,” where the owner/operator determines and documents that the existing equipment is designed, maintained, inspected, tested and operated in a safe manner. An assessment of the exist- http://www.concoa.com http://www.concoa.com
Table of Contents Feed for the Digital Edition of Chemical Processing-August 2008 Chemical Processing- August 2008 Contents From the Editor ChemicalProcessing.com Field Notes In Process Energy Saver Compliance Advisor Protect your Plant What’s on Tap for Water? Keep Operations Safe Polystyrene Plant Gains Extra Output and More Process Puzzler Plant InSites Equipment & Services Adlits Product Spotlight/Classifieds Ad Index End Point Chemical Processing-August 2008 Chemical Processing-August 2008 - Chemical Processing- August 2008 (Page Cover1) Chemical Processing-August 2008 - Chemical Processing- August 2008 (Page Cover2) Chemical Processing-August 2008 - Chemical Processing- August 2008 (Page 3) Chemical Processing-August 2008 - Chemical Processing- August 2008 (Page 4) Chemical Processing-August 2008 - Contents (Page 5) Chemical Processing-August 2008 - Contents (Page 6) Chemical Processing-August 2008 - From the Editor (Page 7) Chemical Processing-August 2008 - From the Editor (Page 8) Chemical Processing-August 2008 - ChemicalProcessing.com (Page 9) Chemical Processing-August 2008 - ChemicalProcessing.com (Page 10) Chemical Processing-August 2008 - Field Notes (Page 11) Chemical Processing-August 2008 - Field Notes (Page 12) Chemical Processing-August 2008 - In Process (Page 13) Chemical Processing-August 2008 - In Process (Page 14) Chemical Processing-August 2008 - In Process (Page 15) Chemical Processing-August 2008 - In Process (Page 16) Chemical Processing-August 2008 - Energy Saver (Page 17) Chemical Processing-August 2008 - Energy Saver (Page 18) Chemical Processing-August 2008 - Compliance Advisor (Page 19) Chemical Processing-August 2008 - Protect your Plant (Page 20) Chemical Processing-August 2008 - Protect your Plant (Page 21) Chemical Processing-August 2008 - Protect your Plant (Page 22) Chemical Processing-August 2008 - Protect your Plant (Page 23) Chemical Processing-August 2008 - Protect your Plant (Page 24) Chemical Processing-August 2008 - Protect your Plant (Page 25) Chemical Processing-August 2008 - Protect your Plant (Page 26) Chemical Processing-August 2008 - What’s on Tap for Water? (Page 27) Chemical Processing-August 2008 - What’s on Tap for Water? (Page 28) Chemical Processing-August 2008 - What’s on Tap for Water? (Page 29) Chemical Processing-August 2008 - What’s on Tap for Water? (Page 30) Chemical Processing-August 2008 - What’s on Tap for Water? (Page 31) Chemical Processing-August 2008 - Keep Operations Safe (Page 32) Chemical Processing-August 2008 - Keep Operations Safe (Page 33) Chemical Processing-August 2008 - Keep Operations Safe (Page 34) Chemical Processing-August 2008 - Keep Operations Safe (Page 35) Chemical Processing-August 2008 - Keep Operations Safe (Page 36) Chemical Processing-August 2008 - Keep Operations Safe (Page 37) Chemical Processing-August 2008 - Keep Operations Safe (Page 38) Chemical Processing-August 2008 - Polystyrene Plant Gains Extra Output and More (Page 39) Chemical Processing-August 2008 - Polystyrene Plant Gains Extra Output and More (Page 40) Chemical Processing-August 2008 - Process Puzzler (Page 41) Chemical Processing-August 2008 - Process Puzzler (Page 42) Chemical Processing-August 2008 - Plant InSites (Page 43) Chemical Processing-August 2008 - Equipment & Services (Page 44) Chemical Processing-August 2008 - Adlits (Page 45) Chemical Processing-August 2008 - Product Spotlight/Classifieds (Page 46) Chemical Processing-August 2008 - Product Spotlight/Classifieds (Page 47) Chemical Processing-August 2008 - Product Spotlight/Classifieds (Page 48) Chemical Processing-August 2008 - Ad Index (Page 49) Chemical Processing-August 2008 - End Point (Page 50) Chemical Processing-August 2008 - End Point (Page Cover3) Chemical Processing-August 2008 - End Point (Page Cover4)
For optimal viewing of this digital publication, please enable JavaScript and then refresh the page. If you would like to try to load the digital publication without using Flash Player detection, please click here.