Chemical Processing - October 2007 - (Page 46) Before the advent of smart HART and fieldbus positioners, feedback measurements of position were rare because a separate position transmitter had to be purchased, installed and wired. So, the user generally wasn’t aware that differences in valve, actuator and pneumatic positioner design were the source of cycling in the process. Typically, besides traditional factors such as size and materials of construction, control valve specifications have focused on minimizing leakage through the valve at shutoff and emissions to the environment from packing. Too often, to reduce project costs, plants pick on/off valves to address requirements. This can create performance problems that can’t be fixed simply by adding a smart positioner. While installing a smart positioner always is beneficial, an incorrect feedback mechanism in the valve design can give a false indication of performance. To avoid problems, always consider five basic valve requirements — linearity, dead time, response time, resolution and dead band. They can give crucial guidance and justification for a final element that leads to better control. Rangeability and sensitivity also are important but, as we’ll see, properly meeting the other requirements will address them. Linear in a nonlinear world To get on a common basis, we need to define process gain for a self-regulating process as the final percent change in the controlled variable divided by the percent change in valve position. Note that the calibration span of the transmitter for the controlled variable is a factor. Because the changes seen in data historians for process variables are in engineering units, they must be converted to percent of scale. The maximum allowable controller gain is inversely proportional to the process gain. The process gain for flow is the slope on a plot of percent flow versus percent valve position (travel). The plot should reflect the installed flow characteristic, not the inherent trim characteristic. This accounts for the reduced pressure drop available to the control valve at higher flows because of the increase in pressure drop in the rest of the system from frictional losses and a decrease in pump discharge pressure. The changing valve drop makes an equal-percentage trim more like a linear characteristic and a linear trim more like quick-opening characteristic. The effect increases as the valve pressure drop as a percent of the total system pressure drop is decreased. In Figure 1 we see the process gain gets too low for travel above 80% of a sliding stem valve. The control loop must make very large changes in position to change the flow. For similar conditions a ball or butterfly with a 60° maximum rotation would see a corresponding excessive loss of sensitivity at about 60% travel, a typical problem for high capacity valves [1]. A linear installed characteristic is particularly desirable for flow and liquid pressure loops. For critical loops, soft46 • October 2007 >> Installed characteristic Valve travel (%) 100 80 60 40 20 0 3 Experimental data Flow model 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Flow (%) Gain model En tech gain specification 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2 Process gain (% flow/% travel) 1 Valve travel (%) Figure 1. Process gain becomes too low when travel of sliding stem valve exceeds 80%. Source: Ref. 1. ware programs can generate the installed characteristics with normal fluid data used for sizing the valve if the system frictional loss and pump curve also are known. You then can set the controller gain per the maximum process gain on the plot. You can obtain better performance by computing the controller gain as a function of controller output per the plot. Of course, this depends upon a fixed installed characteristic, so in general the controller gain is reduced. An adaptive controller is now available that can automatically identify the process gain online for more accurate scheduling of the controller gain and tighter process control [2]. Another option is to put a signal characterization block between the controller output and the command signal for valve travel. The signal characterizer computes the percent stroke needed to obtain a percent desired flow (abscissa from the ordinate of the installed valve characteristic). This signal characterization will decrease the effect of resolution and dead band on the flat portion of the curve because it magnifies the change in signal to the valve. The opposite is true for steep portions of the curve. If control valve positions are maximized as plants are pushed beyond their design capacity, the greater concern is the loss in sensitivity at higher valve positions as shown in Figure 1. If the pressure drop across the control valve is large compared to the pressure drop in the rest of the system — e.g., as in pressure letdown, reagent, surge and vent valves — the installed characteristic essentially is the inherent characteristic. For an equal-percentage trim, the nonlinearity is extreme (process gain can change by a factor of fifty) because the slope of the characteristic is proportional to flow. If a pH loop directly throttles a reagent valve on a static mixer, this change in slope on the valve characteristic compensates for a change in process gain for pH that is inversely proportional to flow. For a temperature controller that directly throttles a coolant to an exchanger, the equal-percentage characteristic compensates for a temwww.chemicalprocessing.com http://www.chemicalprocessing.com
Table of Contents Feed for the Digital Edition of Chemical Processing - October 2007 Chemical Processing - October 2007 Contents From the Editor ChemicalProcessing.com Field Notes In Process Energy Saver Compliance Advisor Biofeedstocks See Real Growth Become a Cyber-Security Pacesetter Go Beyond Condition Monitoring Disposable Equipment Earns Lasting Role Improve Control Loop Performance Ethanol Plant Boosts Output and Saves Energy Process Puzzler Plant InSites Equipment & Services Ad Lits Product Spotlight/Classifieds Ad Index End Point Chemical Processing - October 2007 Chemical Processing - October 2007 - Chemical Processing - October 2007 (Page Cover1) Chemical Processing - October 2007 - Chemical Processing - October 2007 (Page Cover2) Chemical Processing - October 2007 - Chemical Processing - October 2007 (Page 3) Chemical Processing - October 2007 - Chemical Processing - October 2007 (Page 4) Chemical Processing - October 2007 - Contents (Page 5) Chemical Processing - October 2007 - Contents (Page 6) Chemical Processing - October 2007 - From the Editor (Page 7) Chemical Processing - October 2007 - From the Editor (Page 8) Chemical Processing - October 2007 - ChemicalProcessing.com (Page 9) Chemical Processing - October 2007 - ChemicalProcessing.com (Page 10) Chemical Processing - October 2007 - Field Notes (Page 11) Chemical Processing - October 2007 - Field Notes (Page 12) Chemical Processing - October 2007 - In Process (Page 13) Chemical Processing - October 2007 - In Process (Page 14) Chemical Processing - October 2007 - In Process (Page 15) Chemical Processing - October 2007 - In Process (Page 16) Chemical Processing - October 2007 - Energy Saver (Page 17) Chemical Processing - October 2007 - Energy Saver (Page 18) Chemical Processing - October 2007 - Compliance Advisor (Page 19) Chemical Processing - October 2007 - Biofeedstocks See Real Growth (Page 20) Chemical Processing - October 2007 - Biofeedstocks See Real Growth (Page 21) Chemical Processing - October 2007 - Biofeedstocks See Real Growth (Page 22) Chemical Processing - October 2007 - Biofeedstocks See Real Growth (Page 23) Chemical Processing - October 2007 - Biofeedstocks See Real Growth (Page 24) Chemical Processing - October 2007 - Biofeedstocks See Real Growth (Page 25) Chemical Processing - October 2007 - Become a Cyber-Security Pacesetter (Page 26) Chemical Processing - October 2007 - Become a Cyber-Security Pacesetter (Page 27) Chemical Processing - October 2007 - Become a Cyber-Security Pacesetter (Page 28) Chemical Processing - October 2007 - Become a Cyber-Security Pacesetter (Page 29) Chemical Processing - October 2007 - Become a Cyber-Security Pacesetter (Page 30) Chemical Processing - October 2007 - Become a Cyber-Security Pacesetter (Page 31) Chemical Processing - October 2007 - Go Beyond Condition Monitoring (Page 32) Chemical Processing - October 2007 - Go Beyond Condition Monitoring (Page 33) Chemical Processing - October 2007 - Go Beyond Condition Monitoring (Page 34) Chemical Processing - October 2007 - Go Beyond Condition Monitoring (Page 35) Chemical Processing - October 2007 - Go Beyond Condition Monitoring (Page 36) Chemical Processing - October 2007 - Go Beyond Condition Monitoring (Page 37) Chemical Processing - October 2007 - Disposable Equipment Earns Lasting Role (Page 38) Chemical Processing - October 2007 - Disposable Equipment Earns Lasting Role (Page 39) Chemical Processing - October 2007 - Disposable Equipment Earns Lasting Role (Page 40) Chemical Processing - October 2007 - Disposable Equipment Earns Lasting Role (Page 41) Chemical Processing - October 2007 - Disposable Equipment Earns Lasting Role (Page 42) Chemical Processing - October 2007 - Disposable Equipment Earns Lasting Role (Page 43) Chemical Processing - October 2007 - Disposable Equipment Earns Lasting Role (Page 44) Chemical Processing - October 2007 - Improve Control Loop Performance (Page 45) Chemical Processing - October 2007 - Improve Control Loop Performance (Page 46) Chemical Processing - October 2007 - Improve Control Loop Performance (Page 47) Chemical Processing - October 2007 - Improve Control Loop Performance (Page 48) Chemical Processing - October 2007 - Improve Control Loop Performance (Page 49) Chemical Processing - October 2007 - Improve Control Loop Performance (Page 50) Chemical Processing - October 2007 - Ethanol Plant Boosts Output and Saves Energy (Page 51) Chemical Processing - October 2007 - Ethanol Plant Boosts Output and Saves Energy (Page 52) Chemical Processing - October 2007 - Ethanol Plant Boosts Output and Saves Energy (Page 53) Chemical Processing - October 2007 - Process Puzzler (Page 54) Chemical Processing - October 2007 - Plant InSites (Page 55) Chemical Processing - October 2007 - Equipment & Services (Page 56) Chemical Processing - October 2007 - Equipment & Services (Page 57) Chemical Processing - October 2007 - Ad Lits (Page 58) Chemical Processing - October 2007 - Ad Lits (Page 59) Chemical Processing - October 2007 - Ad Lits (Page 60) Chemical Processing - October 2007 - Product Spotlight/Classifieds (Page 61) Chemical Processing - October 2007 - Product Spotlight/Classifieds (Page 62) Chemical Processing - October 2007 - Product Spotlight/Classifieds (Page 63) Chemical Processing - October 2007 - Product Spotlight/Classifieds (Page 64) Chemical Processing - October 2007 - Ad Index (Page 65) Chemical Processing - October 2007 - End Point (Page 66) Chemical Processing - October 2007 - End Point (Page Cover3) Chemical Processing - October 2007 - End Point (Page Cover4)
For optimal viewing of this digital publication, please enable JavaScript and then refresh the page. If you would like to try to load the digital publication without using Flash Player detection, please click here.