Food Processing - April 2008 - (Page 43) New products and techniques can effectively kill the bugs in environmentally friendly ways. verything’s going green these days, and plant sanitation is no exception. The traditionally chemical-heavy processes that kill the bugs (full-size and microscopic) are particularly fertile ground for more environmentally friendly practices. There are two key questions every plant manager or maintenance supervisor needs to ask himself: Are there chemicals in the sanitation process that can be replaced with greener ones? If not, can we use less of them with the same results? Green often is the result of small improvements multiplied. Something as simple as hand washing can be both ineffective and inefficient. But why automate hand washing? “When you wash your hands, soap is often dispensed into the hands before the water is even turned on. The result is most of the soap is washed down the drain before washing even begins,” says Rebecca Yaffe, director of marketing at Meritech Inc. (www.foodprocessing.com/meritech), Golden, Colo. “In addition, it’s easy to use more water than is needed or to get distracted as the water pours down the drain.” Meritech’s handwashing systems automatically wash, rinse and sanitize hands in a touch-free, germ-killing cycle that begins when an employee puts her hands into the machine and ends after 10 seconds. Manual hand washing can take as long as 1-2 minutes to achieve the same level of protection as the 10-second automated system. “So you may use twice the soap and water without achieving better results,” says Yaffe. The result is 75 percent less soap and water used and 75 percent less waste water. Clean-in-place (CIP) once was a process looked at simply as flushing out the pipes. Nowadays, more precise measurement and control of the CIP process assures the right amounts of cleaning solutions are used and that they have been completely removed before the next processing run. “Optimizing these processes not only enhances product quality, it also allows reduced water usage, energy reduction and easier quality control www.foodprocessing.com when water is returned to the environment,” says Dave Anderson, food and beverage industry manager at Emerson Process Management’s Rosemount Analytical Liquid div. Rosemount is an advocate of conductivity analysis. “Since the various cleaning solutions are more conductive than the water used for flushing, conductivity is a reliable and cost-effective measuring technique,” Anderson explains. Conductivity plays a role in two CIP stages. “To provide detergent of the proper concentration, conductivity measurement is applied to the returning acid and caustic. These conductivity measurements are proportional to concentration or solution strength and are recorded by control systems for validation,” he says. “Conductivity also plays a key role in the CIP/process interface and final rinsing. It detects very accurately the interface between the cleaning solutions, rinse water and the product phases so that valves can be switched at the appropriate time to minimize product loss and maximize uptime. It also accurately determines the interface between cleaning fluids and rinse water. Faster changes from the cleaning and rinse phases result in less chemical usage and less water treatment, an environmental boon,” Anderson concludes. Try something different Ozone is a naturally occurring compound in which three atoms of oxygen combine to form the ozone molecule (O3). Because it’s a highly unstable molecule, due to the weak bond holding the third oxygen atom, it’s a powerful – and short-lived – oxidizing and disinfecting agent. Sanitation occurs when the unstable third oxygen atom is transferred, with a large release of energy, from ozone to the molecule being oxidized. The transfer of energy in oxidation causes the outer membranes of microorganisms to rupture. As ozone molecules enter lysed microorganisms, genetic material (DNA and RNA) is oxidized and destroyed. April 2008 food processing • 43 http://www.foodprocessing.com
Table of Contents Feed for the Digital Edition of Food Processing - April 2008 Food Processing - April 2008 Contents Editor's Plate NewsBites The Trends Rollout Food Biz Kids Consumer Taste Test - Indulgent, Superpremium Chocolate...at 3 Calories a Pop Cover Story - Annual Capital Spending Report - To Build or Not to Build? Ingredients - Trendy Fruits, Nuts and Vegetables Plant Operations - iPlant: Assessing the State of Automation Plant Operations - Your Sanitation Can Be Greener Packaging - For Which Oven? MRO Q&A New Supplier Products Toops Scoops Food Processing - April 2008 Food Processing - April 2008 - Food Processing - April 2008 (Page Cover1) Food Processing - April 2008 - Food Processing - April 2008 (Page Cover2) Food Processing - April 2008 - Food Processing - April 2008 (Page 3) Food Processing - April 2008 - Food Processing - April 2008 (Page 4) Food Processing - April 2008 - Contents (Page 5) Food Processing - April 2008 - Contents (Page 6) Food Processing - April 2008 - Editor's Plate (Page 7) Food Processing - April 2008 - Editor's Plate (Page 8) Food Processing - April 2008 - Editor's Plate (Page 9) Food Processing - April 2008 - Editor's Plate (Page 10) Food Processing - April 2008 - NewsBites (Page 11) Food Processing - April 2008 - NewsBites (Page 12) Food Processing - April 2008 - NewsBites (Page 13) Food Processing - April 2008 - NewsBites (Page 14) Food Processing - April 2008 - The Trends (Page 15) Food Processing - April 2008 - The Trends (Page 16) Food Processing - April 2008 - The Trends (Page 17) Food Processing - April 2008 - Rollout (Page 18) Food Processing - April 2008 - Rollout (Page 19) Food Processing - April 2008 - Rollout (Page 20) Food Processing - April 2008 - Food Biz Kids (Page 21) Food Processing - April 2008 - Consumer Taste Test - Indulgent, Superpremium Chocolate...at 3 Calories a Pop (Page 22) Food Processing - April 2008 - Consumer Taste Test - Indulgent, Superpremium Chocolate...at 3 Calories a Pop (Page 23) Food Processing - April 2008 - Cover Story - Annual Capital Spending Report - To Build or Not to Build? (Page 24) Food Processing - April 2008 - Cover Story - Annual Capital Spending Report - To Build or Not to Build? (Page 25) Food Processing - April 2008 - Cover Story - Annual Capital Spending Report - To Build or Not to Build? (Page 26) Food Processing - April 2008 - Cover Story - Annual Capital Spending Report - To Build or Not to Build? (Page 27) Food Processing - April 2008 - Cover Story - Annual Capital Spending Report - To Build or Not to Build? (Page 28) Food Processing - April 2008 - Cover Story - Annual Capital Spending Report - To Build or Not to Build? (Page 29) Food Processing - April 2008 - Cover Story - Annual Capital Spending Report - To Build or Not to Build? (Page 30) Food Processing - April 2008 - Cover Story - Annual Capital Spending Report - To Build or Not to Build? (Page 31) Food Processing - April 2008 - Ingredients - Trendy Fruits, Nuts and Vegetables (Page 32) Food Processing - April 2008 - Ingredients - Trendy Fruits, Nuts and Vegetables (Page 33) Food Processing - April 2008 - Ingredients - Trendy Fruits, Nuts and Vegetables (Page 34) Food Processing - April 2008 - Ingredients - Trendy Fruits, Nuts and Vegetables (Page 35) Food Processing - April 2008 - Ingredients - Trendy Fruits, Nuts and Vegetables (Page 36) Food Processing - April 2008 - Ingredients - Trendy Fruits, Nuts and Vegetables (Page 37) Food Processing - April 2008 - Plant Operations - iPlant: Assessing the State of Automation (Page 38) Food Processing - April 2008 - Plant Operations - iPlant: Assessing the State of Automation (Page 39) Food Processing - April 2008 - Plant Operations - iPlant: Assessing the State of Automation (Page 40) Food Processing - April 2008 - Plant Operations - iPlant: Assessing the State of Automation (Page 41) Food Processing - April 2008 - Plant Operations - iPlant: Assessing the State of Automation (Page 42) Food Processing - April 2008 - Plant Operations - Your Sanitation Can Be Greener (Page 43) Food Processing - April 2008 - Plant Operations - Your Sanitation Can Be Greener (Page 44) Food Processing - April 2008 - Plant Operations - Your Sanitation Can Be Greener (Page 45) Food Processing - April 2008 - Plant Operations - Your Sanitation Can Be Greener (Page 46) Food Processing - April 2008 - Plant Operations - Your Sanitation Can Be Greener (Page 47) Food Processing - April 2008 - Packaging - For Which Oven? (Page 48) Food Processing - April 2008 - Packaging - For Which Oven? (Page 49) Food Processing - April 2008 - Packaging - For Which Oven? (Page 50) Food Processing - April 2008 - Packaging - For Which Oven? (Page 51) Food Processing - April 2008 - Packaging - For Which Oven? (Page 52) Food Processing - April 2008 - Packaging - For Which Oven? (Page 53) Food Processing - April 2008 - Packaging - For Which Oven? (Page 54) Food Processing - April 2008 - Packaging - For Which Oven? (Page 55) Food Processing - April 2008 - Packaging - For Which Oven? (Page 56) Food Processing - April 2008 - MRO Q&A (Page 57) Food Processing - April 2008 - MRO Q&A (Page 58) Food Processing - April 2008 - New Supplier Products (Page 59) Food Processing - April 2008 - New Supplier Products (Page 60) Food Processing - April 2008 - New Supplier Products (Page 61) Food Processing - April 2008 - New Supplier Products (Page 62) Food Processing - April 2008 - New Supplier Products (Page 63) Food Processing - April 2008 - New Supplier Products (Page 64) Food Processing - April 2008 - New Supplier Products (Page 65) Food Processing - April 2008 - Toops Scoops (Page 66) Food Processing - April 2008 - Toops Scoops (Page Cover3) Food Processing - April 2008 - Toops Scoops (Page Cover4)
For optimal viewing of this digital publication, please enable JavaScript and then refresh the page. If you would like to try to load the digital publication without using Flash Player detection, please click here.