Mailing Systems Technology - February 2008 - (Page 22) Management More Improve your inserting throughput with zero capital investment By Mike Porter re you looking for a way to improve productivity in your inserting operation? Okay, that’s a dumb question — who wouldn’t want improved productivity? It allows you to meet SLAs better, gives you more time for quality control, frees up capacity for accepting more work and might even lower your labor costs. Mail center managers are always looking for ways to push more mail through the shop on every shift. There are many ways to accomplish this: better scheduling, more efficient material movement, more operators, more equipment or faster machines, etc. An area that is frequently overlooked is the envelopes used in the shop. While the other measures can certainly make a difference and may be appropriate steps to take in some situations, improvements in envelopes are something that can make a big difference with little or no cost. How Envelopes Are Related to Productivity Fixing problems with materials often results in improvements that exceed the performance bumps that you can expect from the investments in new hardware — with little or productivity, less expense A no expense. The key to higher productivity is keeping the inserter running at the highest speed manageable. Anything that stops the machine on a repetitive basis is going to have a big impact on the throughput statistics. Poorly running envelopes have opportunities to cause problems in multiple places during the inserting operation: Envelope feeding, insertion of material, flap opening, flap closing, sealing, metering and stacking. Operations managers have a tendency to blame the equipment first for the downtime that takes a big chunk out of the finishedpieces-per-hour statistics. But, in fact, there are many factors that can have an effect on those numbers. The machinery itself is one factor, but often the envelopes running on them could very well be the real problem. When you do decide to invest in higher speed inserting equipment, the demands put upon the envelopes are even greater. Not all envelopes are designed for the stresses of a highspeed environment. In fact, some managers have experienced initial disappointment in their new equipment because the output is actually LESS than their old machine — at least until they work out the material problems and their operators become more efficient at setting up and running the machine. 22 FEBRUARY 2008 | WWW.MAILINGSYSTEMSTECHNOLOGY.COM http://www.MailingSystemsTechnology.com
Table of Contents Feed for the Digital Edition of Mailing Systems Technology - February 2008 Mailing Systems Technology - February 2008 Contents Editor’s Note Peer to Peer How to Green Your Mail Center Adopting an Automated Document Factory Warning! Avoid Negative Financial Impact More Productivity, Less Expense BCC Software Formscan A Smooth Transition Kate’s Slate Products & Services Advertiser Index Sho Time Mailing Systems Technology - February 2008 Mailing Systems Technology - February 2008 - Mailing Systems Technology - February 2008 (Page 1) Mailing Systems Technology - February 2008 - Mailing Systems Technology - February 2008 (Page 2) Mailing Systems Technology - February 2008 - Mailing Systems Technology - February 2008 (Page 3) Mailing Systems Technology - February 2008 - Contents (Page 4) Mailing Systems Technology - February 2008 - Contents (Page 5) Mailing Systems Technology - February 2008 - Editor’s Note (Page 6) Mailing Systems Technology - February 2008 - Editor’s Note (Page 7) Mailing Systems Technology - February 2008 - Peer to Peer (Page 8) Mailing Systems Technology - February 2008 - Peer to Peer (Page 9) Mailing Systems Technology - February 2008 - How to Green Your Mail Center (Page 10) Mailing Systems Technology - February 2008 - How to Green Your Mail Center (Page 11) Mailing Systems Technology - February 2008 - How to Green Your Mail Center (Page 12) Mailing Systems Technology - February 2008 - How to Green Your Mail Center (Page 13) Mailing Systems Technology - February 2008 - Adopting an Automated Document Factory (Page 14) Mailing Systems Technology - February 2008 - Adopting an Automated Document Factory (Page 15) Mailing Systems Technology - February 2008 - Adopting an Automated Document Factory (Page 16) Mailing Systems Technology - February 2008 - Adopting an Automated Document Factory (Page 17) Mailing Systems Technology - February 2008 - Warning! (Page 18) Mailing Systems Technology - February 2008 - Warning! (Page 19) Mailing Systems Technology - February 2008 - Avoid Negative Financial Impact (Page 20) Mailing Systems Technology - February 2008 - Avoid Negative Financial Impact (Page 21) Mailing Systems Technology - February 2008 - More Productivity, Less Expense (Page 22) Mailing Systems Technology - February 2008 - More Productivity, Less Expense (Page 23) Mailing Systems Technology - February 2008 - More Productivity, Less Expense (Page 24) Mailing Systems Technology - February 2008 - More Productivity, Less Expense (Page 25) Mailing Systems Technology - February 2008 - BCC Software (Page 26) Mailing Systems Technology - February 2008 - Formscan (Page 27) Mailing Systems Technology - February 2008 - A Smooth Transition (Page 28) Mailing Systems Technology - February 2008 - A Smooth Transition (Page 29) Mailing Systems Technology - February 2008 - Kate’s Slate (Page 30) Mailing Systems Technology - February 2008 - Kate’s Slate (Page 31) Mailing Systems Technology - February 2008 - Products & Services (Page 32) Mailing Systems Technology - February 2008 - Advertiser Index (Page 33) Mailing Systems Technology - February 2008 - Sho Time (Page 34) Mailing Systems Technology - February 2008 - Sho Time (Page 35) Mailing Systems Technology - February 2008 - Sho Time (Page 36)
For optimal viewing of this digital publication, please enable JavaScript and then refresh the page. If you would like to try to load the digital publication without using Flash Player detection, please click here.