Mailing Systems Technology - February 2008 - (Page 24) Poorly Running Envelopes Have a Financial Impact In many companies, the purchasing department controls what envelopes get used in the inserting operation. It is the nature of the job of a purchasing agent to focus on the price paid. Envelopes are viewed as a commodity and are understood by the purchasing depart- ment from their perspective of regular office use. Few purchasing agents will have insight into the important differences that exist in a high-volume mail shop without getting some guidance and input from operations. The purchasing departments are good at making sure they order envelopes that meet the specifications they have been given for size or window placement, but may not be so aware of the importance of quality criteria that will impact productivity. To make matters worse, they may be making replenishment purchase decisions based on the best available price each time, resulting in sourcing the envelopes from multiple vendors. Using envelopes that vary in design, materials, quality or packaging is even worse than dealing with one envelope that is consistently causing problems. In the high-speed inserting world, envelope problems that increase jams can quickly erase any savings realized by a slight reduction in the price of the material. Besides the productivity lost while the operator is clearing jams, there is also the very high cost of reprinting and manually mailing damaged pieces. In consumer billing applications, where the highest percentage of customers pay their bills the day they receive them, a day or two delay caused by lower productivity or manual reprints can have an effect on cash flow as well. If an operator starts having repeated problems after loading envelopes from a newly opened case, they toss the whole carton into the trash. What happens to the purchasing savings then? I’ve been in lots of shops where, if an operator starts having repeated problems after loading envelopes from a newly opened case, they toss the whole carton into the trash. It’s just not worth it to keep fighting what is perceived as a “bad box.” What happens to the purchasing savings then? There are also costs that lack objective measurements but definitely impact productivity, such as the damage done to morale and motivation of employees. Inserter operators generally are more satisfied and productive 24 FEBRUARY 2008 | WWW.MAILINGSYSTEMSTECHNOLOGY.COM http://www.MailingSystemsTechnology.com
Table of Contents Feed for the Digital Edition of Mailing Systems Technology - February 2008 Mailing Systems Technology - February 2008 Contents Editor’s Note Peer to Peer How to Green Your Mail Center Adopting an Automated Document Factory Warning! Avoid Negative Financial Impact More Productivity, Less Expense BCC Software Formscan A Smooth Transition Kate’s Slate Products & Services Advertiser Index Sho Time Mailing Systems Technology - February 2008 Mailing Systems Technology - February 2008 - Mailing Systems Technology - February 2008 (Page 1) Mailing Systems Technology - February 2008 - Mailing Systems Technology - February 2008 (Page 2) Mailing Systems Technology - February 2008 - Mailing Systems Technology - February 2008 (Page 3) Mailing Systems Technology - February 2008 - Contents (Page 4) Mailing Systems Technology - February 2008 - Contents (Page 5) Mailing Systems Technology - February 2008 - Editor’s Note (Page 6) Mailing Systems Technology - February 2008 - Editor’s Note (Page 7) Mailing Systems Technology - February 2008 - Peer to Peer (Page 8) Mailing Systems Technology - February 2008 - Peer to Peer (Page 9) Mailing Systems Technology - February 2008 - How to Green Your Mail Center (Page 10) Mailing Systems Technology - February 2008 - How to Green Your Mail Center (Page 11) Mailing Systems Technology - February 2008 - How to Green Your Mail Center (Page 12) Mailing Systems Technology - February 2008 - How to Green Your Mail Center (Page 13) Mailing Systems Technology - February 2008 - Adopting an Automated Document Factory (Page 14) Mailing Systems Technology - February 2008 - Adopting an Automated Document Factory (Page 15) Mailing Systems Technology - February 2008 - Adopting an Automated Document Factory (Page 16) Mailing Systems Technology - February 2008 - Adopting an Automated Document Factory (Page 17) Mailing Systems Technology - February 2008 - Warning! (Page 18) Mailing Systems Technology - February 2008 - Warning! (Page 19) Mailing Systems Technology - February 2008 - Avoid Negative Financial Impact (Page 20) Mailing Systems Technology - February 2008 - Avoid Negative Financial Impact (Page 21) Mailing Systems Technology - February 2008 - More Productivity, Less Expense (Page 22) Mailing Systems Technology - February 2008 - More Productivity, Less Expense (Page 23) Mailing Systems Technology - February 2008 - More Productivity, Less Expense (Page 24) Mailing Systems Technology - February 2008 - More Productivity, Less Expense (Page 25) Mailing Systems Technology - February 2008 - BCC Software (Page 26) Mailing Systems Technology - February 2008 - Formscan (Page 27) Mailing Systems Technology - February 2008 - A Smooth Transition (Page 28) Mailing Systems Technology - February 2008 - A Smooth Transition (Page 29) Mailing Systems Technology - February 2008 - Kate’s Slate (Page 30) Mailing Systems Technology - February 2008 - Kate’s Slate (Page 31) Mailing Systems Technology - February 2008 - Products & Services (Page 32) Mailing Systems Technology - February 2008 - Advertiser Index (Page 33) Mailing Systems Technology - February 2008 - Sho Time (Page 34) Mailing Systems Technology - February 2008 - Sho Time (Page 35) Mailing Systems Technology - February 2008 - Sho Time (Page 36)
For optimal viewing of this digital publication, please enable JavaScript and then refresh the page. If you would like to try to load the digital publication without using Flash Player detection, please click here.