Mailing Systems Technology - July/August 2008 - (Page 17) which distracts the staff from processing the expense reports in the first place. There are labor savings possible as a result of this; whether they are significant largely depends on the size of your operation. At Sprint, we don’t try to pouch items other than documents. Pouching larger items makes the process more complex because of additional packaging and perhaps additional paperwork. Reduced Shipping Expense Although Sprint has negotiated rates with our preferred carriers, it’s still less expensive to send 10 envelopes as a single shipment than it is to send all 10 of them as individual shipments. Employees who send AIOM also save internal dollars for their own departments because the Mail Services group pays the freight for all pouch mail shipments. One of the first tasks in planning the AIOM service was to figure out where the most intracompany traffic was coming from and going to. We did this by analyzing our overnight carrier bills to identify which Sprint sites generated the most shipments to other Sprint sites. As a first cut, we identified which ZIP Codes are the largest sources or destinations of Sprint shipments. While there are other destinations in these ZIP Codes besides Sprint offices, this technique does provide a great starting place for a more detailed review. Based on this information, we decided which routes to support for our AIOM service. Service Levels We considered what service levels are appropriate and achievable for our accountable interoffice mail service. On the one hand, the service levels must be attractive enough to employees that they will use the service. On the other hand, they should not be so aggressive that they are too difficult or expensive to achieve on a daily basis. We can’t provide better service levels than the carriers because our service will be built on top of carriers to move mail pouches from site to site. The exception to this rule is that your geography may allow for an internally operated local or metropolitan courier service between your sites. We set cut-off times that guarantee that interoffice mail will meet the service levels. We needed to allow sufficient time for couriers to return to the shipping department after sweeping all the mail centers and for the pouches to be prepared in time to meet the arrival of the carrier’s afternoon pickup. Processing Accountable Interoffice Mail The processes for handling accountable interoffice mail during the “first” and “last” miles are almost identical to your processes for handling inbound and outbound shipments. An outbound piece of accountable interoffice mail is just like handling an outbound private carrier (DHL, FedEX, UPS, etc.) shipment from the sender’s mail center until it reaches the shipping department. At this point, private carrier shipments are handed over to the driver. On the other hand, accountable interoffice mailpieces are scanned into a mail pouch for the proper destination. We use our internal tracking system to quickly handle this process. When all items have been scanned WWW.MAILINGSYSTEMSTECHNOLOGY.COM | JULY-AUGUST 2008 17 http://www.mailingsystemstechnology.com
Table of Contents Feed for the Digital Edition of Mailing Systems Technology - July/August 2008 Mailing Systems Technology - July/August 2008 Contents Editor’s Note Peer to Peer The Economics of Inkjet Addressing Virtual Mailstream Management Guarding Your Internal Documents Top It Off With Training Implementing Digital Mail Saving You Money Kate’s Slate Products & Services Advertiser Index Sho Time Who’s Who Company Profiles BCC Software BÖWE BELL + HOWELL Collins Ink Corporation Datatech SmartSoft Endicia Hasler, Inc. Kern, Inc. Kirk-Rudy Mail Quip, Inc. MCS, Inc. Melissa Data MidSouth Technologies, a NPI Company Neopost NPI Parascript Pitney Bowes Inc. Rena Systems Satori Software, Inc. Mailing Systems Technology - July/August 2008 Mailing Systems Technology - July/August 2008 - Mailing Systems Technology - July/August 2008 (Page 1) Mailing Systems Technology - July/August 2008 - Mailing Systems Technology - July/August 2008 (Page 2) Mailing Systems Technology - July/August 2008 - Mailing Systems Technology - July/August 2008 (Page 3) Mailing Systems Technology - July/August 2008 - Contents (Page 4) Mailing Systems Technology - July/August 2008 - Contents (Page 5) Mailing Systems Technology - July/August 2008 - Editor’s Note (Page 6) Mailing Systems Technology - July/August 2008 - Editor’s Note (Page 7) Mailing Systems Technology - July/August 2008 - Peer to Peer (Page 8) Mailing Systems Technology - July/August 2008 - Peer to Peer (Page 9) Mailing Systems Technology - July/August 2008 - Peer to Peer (Page 10) Mailing Systems Technology - July/August 2008 - Peer to Peer (Page 11) Mailing Systems Technology - July/August 2008 - The Economics of Inkjet Addressing (Page 12) Mailing Systems Technology - July/August 2008 - The Economics of Inkjet Addressing (Page 13) Mailing Systems Technology - July/August 2008 - Virtual Mailstream Management (Page 14) Mailing Systems Technology - July/August 2008 - Virtual Mailstream Management (Page 15) Mailing Systems Technology - July/August 2008 - Guarding Your Internal Documents (Page 16) Mailing Systems Technology - July/August 2008 - Guarding Your Internal Documents (Page 17) Mailing Systems Technology - July/August 2008 - Guarding Your Internal Documents (Page 18) Mailing Systems Technology - July/August 2008 - Guarding Your Internal Documents (Page 19) Mailing Systems Technology - July/August 2008 - Top It Off With Training (Page 20) Mailing Systems Technology - July/August 2008 - Top It Off With Training (Page 21) Mailing Systems Technology - July/August 2008 - Implementing Digital Mail (Page 22) Mailing Systems Technology - July/August 2008 - Implementing Digital Mail (Page 23) Mailing Systems Technology - July/August 2008 - Saving You Money (Page 24) Mailing Systems Technology - July/August 2008 - Saving You Money (Page 25) Mailing Systems Technology - July/August 2008 - Kate’s Slate (Page 26) Mailing Systems Technology - July/August 2008 - Kate’s Slate (Page 27) Mailing Systems Technology - July/August 2008 - Products & Services (Page 28) Mailing Systems Technology - July/August 2008 - Advertiser Index (Page 29) Mailing Systems Technology - July/August 2008 - Sho Time (Page 30) Mailing Systems Technology - July/August 2008 - Sho Time (Page 31) Mailing Systems Technology - July/August 2008 - Who’s Who Company Profiles (Page 32) Mailing Systems Technology - July/August 2008 - BCC Software (Page 33) Mailing Systems Technology - July/August 2008 - BÖWE BELL + HOWELL (Page 34) Mailing Systems Technology - July/August 2008 - Collins Ink Corporation (Page 35) Mailing Systems Technology - July/August 2008 - Datatech SmartSoft (Page 36) Mailing Systems Technology - July/August 2008 - Endicia (Page 37) Mailing Systems Technology - July/August 2008 - Hasler, Inc. (Page 38) Mailing Systems Technology - July/August 2008 - Kern, Inc. (Page 39) Mailing Systems Technology - July/August 2008 - Kirk-Rudy (Page 40) Mailing Systems Technology - July/August 2008 - Mail Quip, Inc. (Page 41) Mailing Systems Technology - July/August 2008 - MCS, Inc. (Page 42) Mailing Systems Technology - July/August 2008 - Melissa Data (Page 43) Mailing Systems Technology - July/August 2008 - MidSouth Technologies, a NPI Company (Page 44) Mailing Systems Technology - July/August 2008 - Neopost (Page 45) Mailing Systems Technology - July/August 2008 - NPI (Page 46) Mailing Systems Technology - July/August 2008 - Parascript (Page 47) Mailing Systems Technology - July/August 2008 - Pitney Bowes Inc. (Page 48) Mailing Systems Technology - July/August 2008 - Rena Systems (Page 49) Mailing Systems Technology - July/August 2008 - Satori Software, Inc. (Page 50) Mailing Systems Technology - July/August 2008 - Satori Software, Inc. (Page 51) Mailing Systems Technology - July/August 2008 - Satori Software, Inc. (Page 52)
For optimal viewing of this digital publication, please enable JavaScript and then refresh the page. If you would like to try to load the digital publication without using Flash Player detection, please click here.