Mailing Systems Technology - July/August 2008 - (Page 24) Management Money Scrubbing mailing lists to reach intended recipients more quickly and at the lowest possible rates By Harry Stephens saving you P ostal rates are changing. Last year, First-Class rates went from 39¢ to 41¢ and will go up again to 42¢ in May. The cost for other types of business mail is also increasing, including rates on non-standard pieces like 9” x 12” envelopes, international mail and even the discounted rates for pre-sorted automated mailings. Although these increases are measured in pennies or less per item, for business mailers who regularly mail to thousands or even tens of thousands of customers, these pennies can add up fast. So what can mailers do to reduce costs? For decades, the USPS has been investing in more automation to process the mail faster with improved accuracy. While these are important benefits, in order to take advantage of automation, mailpieces have to become more standardized so that addresses and barcodes are placed on the envelope or wrapper where the machines can read it as well as in a recognizable format for the machines to read. But if most standard-sized and properly addressed mailpieces can be sorted and directed more quickly by machines, then the odd-sized items, and those with questionable addresses, become the exception. They are sidetracked because they require special handling, which takes extra time and labor. The USPS has noted that undeliverable as addressed (UAA) mail must be forwarded, returned to the sender or treated as waste because addresses are incomplete, incorrect or out-of- date. These are all forms of special handling. The cost for processing UAA mail is more than $1 billion per year. To combat these costs, the USPS has been focusing on reducing UAA mail to cut this amount in half by 2012. Perfecting the System Since 2004, the USPS has taken a step-by-step approach to improving its internal systems, as well as setting tighter compliance standards for discounted automation postal rates. They are using incentives to implement the new policies, which includes the lowest possible rate for volume mailings, along with tougher requirements to qualify for those rates. Automated mail that is returned as “undeliverable” can be charged to the mailer at First-Class rates, either per item, or in some cases, for the whole mailing. Mailers who repeatedly fail to comply with the current standards can be fined — which ultimately increases overall operating costs. But the USPS also works hard to help mailers meet automated requirements by offering software tools to check, and often even correct, mailing lists before the labels are printed. On its own and working with other vendors, the USPS provides a variety of data and software programs that help mailers keep their lists up-to-date by drawing upon resources that include frequently updated municipal 911/Emergency address information as well as information that mail carriers can provide through familiarity with their delivery routes. Mail that is thoroughly “scrubbed” 24 JULY-AUGUST 2008 | WWW.MAILINGSYSTEMSTECHNOLOGY.COM http://www.mailingsystemstechnology.com
Table of Contents Feed for the Digital Edition of Mailing Systems Technology - July/August 2008 Mailing Systems Technology - July/August 2008 Contents Editor’s Note Peer to Peer The Economics of Inkjet Addressing Virtual Mailstream Management Guarding Your Internal Documents Top It Off With Training Implementing Digital Mail Saving You Money Kate’s Slate Products & Services Advertiser Index Sho Time Who’s Who Company Profiles BCC Software BÖWE BELL + HOWELL Collins Ink Corporation Datatech SmartSoft Endicia Hasler, Inc. Kern, Inc. Kirk-Rudy Mail Quip, Inc. MCS, Inc. Melissa Data MidSouth Technologies, a NPI Company Neopost NPI Parascript Pitney Bowes Inc. Rena Systems Satori Software, Inc. Mailing Systems Technology - July/August 2008 Mailing Systems Technology - July/August 2008 - Mailing Systems Technology - July/August 2008 (Page 1) Mailing Systems Technology - July/August 2008 - Mailing Systems Technology - July/August 2008 (Page 2) Mailing Systems Technology - July/August 2008 - Mailing Systems Technology - July/August 2008 (Page 3) Mailing Systems Technology - July/August 2008 - Contents (Page 4) Mailing Systems Technology - July/August 2008 - Contents (Page 5) Mailing Systems Technology - July/August 2008 - Editor’s Note (Page 6) Mailing Systems Technology - July/August 2008 - Editor’s Note (Page 7) Mailing Systems Technology - July/August 2008 - Peer to Peer (Page 8) Mailing Systems Technology - July/August 2008 - Peer to Peer (Page 9) Mailing Systems Technology - July/August 2008 - Peer to Peer (Page 10) Mailing Systems Technology - July/August 2008 - Peer to Peer (Page 11) Mailing Systems Technology - July/August 2008 - The Economics of Inkjet Addressing (Page 12) Mailing Systems Technology - July/August 2008 - The Economics of Inkjet Addressing (Page 13) Mailing Systems Technology - July/August 2008 - Virtual Mailstream Management (Page 14) Mailing Systems Technology - July/August 2008 - Virtual Mailstream Management (Page 15) Mailing Systems Technology - July/August 2008 - Guarding Your Internal Documents (Page 16) Mailing Systems Technology - July/August 2008 - Guarding Your Internal Documents (Page 17) Mailing Systems Technology - July/August 2008 - Guarding Your Internal Documents (Page 18) Mailing Systems Technology - July/August 2008 - Guarding Your Internal Documents (Page 19) Mailing Systems Technology - July/August 2008 - Top It Off With Training (Page 20) Mailing Systems Technology - July/August 2008 - Top It Off With Training (Page 21) Mailing Systems Technology - July/August 2008 - Implementing Digital Mail (Page 22) Mailing Systems Technology - July/August 2008 - Implementing Digital Mail (Page 23) Mailing Systems Technology - July/August 2008 - Saving You Money (Page 24) Mailing Systems Technology - July/August 2008 - Saving You Money (Page 25) Mailing Systems Technology - July/August 2008 - Kate’s Slate (Page 26) Mailing Systems Technology - July/August 2008 - Kate’s Slate (Page 27) Mailing Systems Technology - July/August 2008 - Products & Services (Page 28) Mailing Systems Technology - July/August 2008 - Advertiser Index (Page 29) Mailing Systems Technology - July/August 2008 - Sho Time (Page 30) Mailing Systems Technology - July/August 2008 - Sho Time (Page 31) Mailing Systems Technology - July/August 2008 - Who’s Who Company Profiles (Page 32) Mailing Systems Technology - July/August 2008 - BCC Software (Page 33) Mailing Systems Technology - July/August 2008 - BÖWE BELL + HOWELL (Page 34) Mailing Systems Technology - July/August 2008 - Collins Ink Corporation (Page 35) Mailing Systems Technology - July/August 2008 - Datatech SmartSoft (Page 36) Mailing Systems Technology - July/August 2008 - Endicia (Page 37) Mailing Systems Technology - July/August 2008 - Hasler, Inc. (Page 38) Mailing Systems Technology - July/August 2008 - Kern, Inc. (Page 39) Mailing Systems Technology - July/August 2008 - Kirk-Rudy (Page 40) Mailing Systems Technology - July/August 2008 - Mail Quip, Inc. (Page 41) Mailing Systems Technology - July/August 2008 - MCS, Inc. (Page 42) Mailing Systems Technology - July/August 2008 - Melissa Data (Page 43) Mailing Systems Technology - July/August 2008 - MidSouth Technologies, a NPI Company (Page 44) Mailing Systems Technology - July/August 2008 - Neopost (Page 45) Mailing Systems Technology - July/August 2008 - NPI (Page 46) Mailing Systems Technology - July/August 2008 - Parascript (Page 47) Mailing Systems Technology - July/August 2008 - Pitney Bowes Inc. (Page 48) Mailing Systems Technology - July/August 2008 - Rena Systems (Page 49) Mailing Systems Technology - July/August 2008 - Satori Software, Inc. (Page 50) Mailing Systems Technology - July/August 2008 - Satori Software, Inc. (Page 51) Mailing Systems Technology - July/August 2008 - Satori Software, Inc. (Page 52)
For optimal viewing of this digital publication, please enable JavaScript and then refresh the page. If you would like to try to load the digital publication without using Flash Player detection, please click here.