Mailing Systems Technology - January/February 2009 - (Page 14) Everything IMB With Kevin Conti & David Robinson Getting Up to Speed on IMB Over the course of 2009, we will provide you with the latest updates and information regarding the USPS’ Intelligent Mail initiatives. For this introductory article, we’ll bring you up to speed on the Intelligent Mail Barcode and provide an overview of the value proposition for mailers most interested in knowing their mail is delivered timely and for those taking advantage of postage discounts. The Intelligent Mail Barcode, also known as the IMB (formerly known as a four-state barcode and then as OneCode), is a replacement for the current PostNet barcode (which will be retired in May 2011). There are significant differences between the IMB and the current PostNet barcode. The main difference is that IMB stores 31 characters of information in five different fields verses the PostNet, which stores 11 characters in one field. The five fields are the Barcode ID, Service Type, Mailer ID, Serial ID and Delivery Point (currently used for PostNet). There are two implementations of the IMB. The first is ”Basic” IMB, which requires all of the above fields to be populated except the serial number field. The second option is the “Full-Service” IMB, which requires the serial ID field to be populated with a uniquely managed ID. This option provides many additional benefits including the lowest postage costs. With Full-Service, mailers must submit their postage statements electronically and ensure their mailpieces, trays/sacks and containers all have the Intelligent Mail Barcodes that link the mailing contents together. In essence, scanning the placard on the pallets must determine which trays are on which pallets, and further nesting should link the specific mailpieces to specific trays. Mailers can begin using the Basic version of IMB at any time; in fact, billions of IMBs have already been scanned from USPS’s pilot sites for nearly two years. The Full-Service IMB will be implemented in May of 2009 with widened adoption expected with the lower postage pricing available in Fall 2009. In the next article, we’ll spend a little time on the latest updates from the USPS on their IMB initiatives and focus on the value of the IMB to mailers. Fact 14% no Most mail managers plan to implement IMB. undecided 23% 63% yes Source: 2008 Mailing Systems Technology Wage & Operations Survey (November 2008) David Robinson has been active in the mailing industry for over eight years and is currently the Director of Address Quality for Pitney Bowes, working on their Postal Relations team located in Washington, DC. He serves on PostCom’s Board, several MTAC workgroups as well as the Universal Postal Union’s S42 Address Standard Committee. Kevin Conti is Director of Mailing Solutions at Pitney Bowes Software. He works in a consultative role with Group 1 Software customers to deploy software solutions that reduce mailing costs and improve customer communications. Kevin has a liaison role with the USPS, industry groups and mailing product organizations. a From a value perspective The USPS sees significant value from the IMB in: 1) Providing the data necessary for service performance measurement; 2) Allowing the USPS to measure the quality of mail (address hygiene); and 3) Tracking mail throughout the USPS’s processing centers to ensure optimum performance. From a mailer’s point of 20 view 0 40 60 80 The value from the IMB can be seen in: 1) Free ACS (full-service provides unlimited for First-Class, 30 days for Standard and 60 days for Periodical Mail) and start the clock service; 2) Eliminating extra tracking barcode and keyline — leaving only the IMB, creating a more attractive mailpiece and freeing up space for messaging; 3) Providing insight into customer response times through mail track and trace; 4) Improving supply chain efficiencies in understanding mailpiece location and delivery time; 5) Low-cost proof of mailing; and 6) Reducing costs, tracking payments and driving revenue by understanding when customer reply mail enters the postal system containing their payment for goods and services. 14 JANUARY - FEBRUARY 2009 a www.MailingSystemsTechnology.com http://www.MailingSystemsTechnology.com
Table of Contents Feed for the Digital Edition of Mailing Systems Technology - January/February 2009 Mailing Systems Technology - January/February 2009 Contents Editor's Note Real Life Management Software Bytes Employing Technology Everything IMB Ship It Best Practices What You Think From the Source Combat "Do Not Mail" Getting to Know Mail.dat How NOT to Run Your Operation Reality Check New Products & Services Advertiser Index Pushing the Envelope Mailing Systems Technology - January/February 2009 Mailing Systems Technology - January/February 2009 - (Page CW1) Mailing Systems Technology - January/February 2009 - (Page CW2) Mailing Systems Technology - January/February 2009 - Mailing Systems Technology - January/February 2009 (Page Cover1) Mailing Systems Technology - January/February 2009 - Mailing Systems Technology - January/February 2009 (Page Cover2) Mailing Systems Technology - January/February 2009 - Mailing Systems Technology - January/February 2009 (Page 3) Mailing Systems Technology - January/February 2009 - Contents (Page 4) Mailing Systems Technology - January/February 2009 - Contents (Page 5) Mailing Systems Technology - January/February 2009 - Editor's Note (Page 6) Mailing Systems Technology - January/February 2009 - Editor's Note (Page 7) Mailing Systems Technology - January/February 2009 - Real Life Management (Page 8) Mailing Systems Technology - January/February 2009 - Real Life Management (Page 9) Mailing Systems Technology - January/February 2009 - Software Bytes (Page 10) Mailing Systems Technology - January/February 2009 - Software Bytes (Page 11) Mailing Systems Technology - January/February 2009 - Employing Technology (Page 12) Mailing Systems Technology - January/February 2009 - Employing Technology (Page 13) Mailing Systems Technology - January/February 2009 - Everything IMB (Page 14) Mailing Systems Technology - January/February 2009 - Everything IMB (Page 15) Mailing Systems Technology - January/February 2009 - Ship It (Page 16) Mailing Systems Technology - January/February 2009 - Ship It (Page 17) Mailing Systems Technology - January/February 2009 - Best Practices (Page 18) Mailing Systems Technology - January/February 2009 - Best Practices (Page 19) Mailing Systems Technology - January/February 2009 - What You Think (Page 20) Mailing Systems Technology - January/February 2009 - What You Think (Page 21) Mailing Systems Technology - January/February 2009 - From the Source (Page 22) Mailing Systems Technology - January/February 2009 - From the Source (Page 23) Mailing Systems Technology - January/February 2009 - Combat "Do Not Mail" (Page 24) Mailing Systems Technology - January/February 2009 - Combat "Do Not Mail" (Page 25) Mailing Systems Technology - January/February 2009 - Getting to Know Mail.dat (Page 26) Mailing Systems Technology - January/February 2009 - Getting to Know Mail.dat (Page 27) Mailing Systems Technology - January/February 2009 - How NOT to Run Your Operation (Page 28) Mailing Systems Technology - January/February 2009 - How NOT to Run Your Operation (Page Blowin1) Mailing Systems Technology - January/February 2009 - How NOT to Run Your Operation (Page Blowin2) Mailing Systems Technology - January/February 2009 - How NOT to Run Your Operation (Page 29) Mailing Systems Technology - January/February 2009 - How NOT to Run Your Operation (Page 30) Mailing Systems Technology - January/February 2009 - How NOT to Run Your Operation (Page 31) Mailing Systems Technology - January/February 2009 - Reality Check (Page 32) Mailing Systems Technology - January/February 2009 - Advertiser Index (Page 33) Mailing Systems Technology - January/February 2009 - Pushing the Envelope (Page 34) Mailing Systems Technology - January/February 2009 - Pushing the Envelope (Page Cover3) Mailing Systems Technology - January/February 2009 - Pushing the Envelope (Page Cover4)
For optimal viewing of this digital publication, please enable JavaScript and then refresh the page. If you would like to try to load the digital publication without using Flash Player detection, please click here.