Consulting-Specifying Engineer - March 2009 - (Page 41) Snubbers: Protecting medium-voltage transformers from electrical transients BY BRUCE W. YOUNG, PE, Bala Consulting Engineers, King of Prussia, Pa. Protecting medium-voltage transformers from electrical transients is vital in the designing and commissioning of electrical distribution and protection systems. This article details how transients are produced and describes a mitigation method using snubbers. A snubber is a resistor-capacitor (RC) network that is designed for the system. Snubbers are a cost-effective method of reducing switching-induced transients. At many installations that use medium-voltage switching, transformer damage is often attributed to lighting. However, this damage is likely caused by transients induced by switching. In a facility with on-site power generation and switching at medium-voltage levels, a power outage results in either a transfer between power sources or a transfer to the generators. The result could induce a transient that could damage the transformer; a snubber network can provide additional protection against damage. Switching transients Switching transients occur when circuit breakers switch transformer primaries in medium- and high-voltage systems, such as automatic switching between utility services or on-site power generation. They also can happen during planned transfers from utility to generator, such as preceding a thunderstorm or routine testing. When a breaker interrupts current flow, an arc develops across the breaker contacts. Since the current interruption usually occurs somewhere other than the current zero crossing point, the arc will remain until the current crosses zero. The result is a voltage developing across the contacts, known as the transient recovery voltage (TRV). To help prevent contact wear, breaker manufacturers provide mechanisms to ensure that the dielectric strength between the contacts increases faster than the TRV develops. As a result of the TRV, a high-frequency transient is induced in the system. Figure 1 represents a graph of current interruption, arc voltage, and the resulting TRV. When the current is interrupted, the resulting TRV has significant high-frequency content. This is a direct result of the quick interruption, or current chopping, of the load current. These transients normally are not produced during fault conditions due to the rapid decay of the energy levels during a fault. To minimize space requirements, modern medium-voltage circuit breakers use vacuum or gas as the dielectric medium. Vacuum has a higher dielectric than air, so the distance required between contacts is much smaller than that for air breakers. The shorter distance increases the speed of the interrupting cycle, which results in current chopping and the introduction of high-frequency transients into the system. Transient level and frequency are functions of the physical distance between the breaker and transformer, transformer construction (virtual path identifier, cast coil, oil filled, basic impulse level ratings), the type of load being switched, and the switching characteristics of the breaker. If these transients are at the natural resonance frequency of the system, then there is the possibility of internal oscillatory voltages developing in the primary windings of the transformer. This voltage is limited only by the small losses at or near the resonance of the system. The voltage can be significantly higher than the insulation ratings and lead to winding failure. For example, a 100-V primary would transform with 100 windings, which results in the turn-to-turn winding insulation that needs to be rated for 1 V at 60 Hz. Impress a voltage signal at the natural resonance of the transformer and the result may be 10 to 20 V between the windings, at resonance. This could damage the windings. It is important to remember that this is a frequency-related issue and not necessarily a voltage issue, and most surge protective devices are not designed to suppress this energy. Consulting-Specifying Engineer • MARCH 2009 41
For optimal viewing of this digital publication, please enable JavaScript and then refresh the page. If you would like to try to load the digital publication without using Flash Player detection, please click here.