Consulting-Specifying Engineer - July 2008 - (Page 60) Equipment Lifecycles Selecting and maintaining smoke detectors Fire and life safety engineers can avoid common problems by properly designing, installing, and maintaining ionization and photoelectric smoke detectors. BY AJ SEVAST, SET, Consultant, RJA Group, Greenwood Village, Colo. moke detectors can have a lifecycle of up to 20 years if certain design and installation recommendations are followed and if annual maintenance is performed for each detector. Given the tight budget of many companies in today’s economy, a reliable fire system can be one less budget issue and one less concern for the owner, operator, or lessee. Generally, when fire systems fail, it is due to lack of planning and maintenance. The following describes common problems associated with detectors that can be avoided at different phases of fire system design, installation, and maintenance. Consider the application When smoke detection devices are selected for a project, the type of detection must be suitable for the application. Ionization and photoelectric smoke detectors commonly are used in many applications. Both detectors have detection limitations, however. The ionization smoke detector is not as effective at detecting flaming fires, while the photoelectric smoke detector is not as efficient with smoldering fires. Therefore, the fuel loads and fire scenarios must be considered before a detector type is chosen. If the wrong detector is selected for an application, the lifecycle of the detector can be shorter or negligible if the detector is rendered useless and needs to be replaced with the right detector. Environmental issues Environmental issues such as altitude, temperature range, humidity, and air contamination need to be considered when selecting detector types. The ionization detectors are S limited to installation at altitudes as high as 3,000 ft above sea level. If they are installed at higher than 3,000 ft above sea level, the detectors often create nuisance alarms and may affect detector responsiveness. The photoelectric smoke detector does not have an altitude limitation. Both detector types can be affected by temperature range and humidity. When detectors are installed where temperatures are below 32 F, ice crystals or condensation can appear inside the sensing chambers and cause the detector to become overly sensitive or create nuisance alarms. At temperatures above 100 F, the detectors’ internal electronic components may not function properly. In humid areas, water droplets can accumulate inside the sensing chamber and affect detector sensitivity, which could create nuisance alarms. Both smoke detectors can be affected by dirty environments, combustion particles, caustic vapors, gas, and fumes that may lead to maintenance issues and nuisance alarms. If air contamination is inevitable, then heat detection may be a better solution for the area in question. It is important to understand the environment a detector is protecting in order to select the correct detector type and increase the lifespan of a smoke detector. Placement and location The efficiency of ionization or photoelectric smoke detectors to detect smoke conditions can be adversely affected if obstructions, ceiling heights, and types of ceiling are not considered when determining their locations. Both detectors are capable of providing 900 sq. ft (30x30 ft) of coverage. 60 Consulting-Specifying Engineer • JULY 2008
Table of Contents Feed for the Digital Edition of Consulting-Specifying Engineer - July 2008 Consulting-Specifying Engineer - July 2008 Contents Viewpoint Letters News M/E Roundtable 40 Under 40 Using Demand-Based Reset Strategies VFDs and Motors: Making the Right Match Grounding and Bonding Practices for Hazardous Areas Codes & Standards Case Study New Products Equipment Lifecycles Advertiser Index Green Space Consulting-Specifying Engineer - July 2008 Consulting-Specifying Engineer - July 2008 - Consulting-Specifying Engineer - July 2008 (Page Cover1) Consulting-Specifying Engineer - July 2008 - Consulting-Specifying Engineer - July 2008 (Page Cover2) Consulting-Specifying Engineer - July 2008 - Consulting-Specifying Engineer - July 2008 (Page 1) Consulting-Specifying Engineer - July 2008 - Consulting-Specifying Engineer - July 2008 (Page 2) Consulting-Specifying Engineer - July 2008 - Contents (Page 3) Consulting-Specifying Engineer - July 2008 - Contents (Page 4) Consulting-Specifying Engineer - July 2008 - Contents (Page 5) Consulting-Specifying Engineer - July 2008 - Contents (Page 6) Consulting-Specifying Engineer - July 2008 - Viewpoint (Page 7) Consulting-Specifying Engineer - July 2008 - Letters (Page 8) Consulting-Specifying Engineer - July 2008 - Letters (Page 9) Consulting-Specifying Engineer - July 2008 - News (Page 10) Consulting-Specifying Engineer - July 2008 - News (Page 11) Consulting-Specifying Engineer - July 2008 - M/E Roundtable (Page 12) Consulting-Specifying Engineer - July 2008 - M/E Roundtable (Page 13) Consulting-Specifying Engineer - July 2008 - M/E Roundtable (Page 14) Consulting-Specifying Engineer - July 2008 - M/E Roundtable (Page 15) Consulting-Specifying Engineer - July 2008 - M/E Roundtable (Page 16) Consulting-Specifying Engineer - July 2008 - 40 Under 40 (Page 17) Consulting-Specifying Engineer - July 2008 - 40 Under 40 (Page 18) Consulting-Specifying Engineer - July 2008 - 40 Under 40 (Page 19) Consulting-Specifying Engineer - July 2008 - 40 Under 40 (Page 20) Consulting-Specifying Engineer - July 2008 - 40 Under 40 (Page 21) Consulting-Specifying Engineer - July 2008 - 40 Under 40 (Page 22) Consulting-Specifying Engineer - July 2008 - 40 Under 40 (Page 23) Consulting-Specifying Engineer - July 2008 - 40 Under 40 (Page 24) Consulting-Specifying Engineer - July 2008 - 40 Under 40 (Page 25) Consulting-Specifying Engineer - July 2008 - 40 Under 40 (Page 26) Consulting-Specifying Engineer - July 2008 - 40 Under 40 (Page 27) Consulting-Specifying Engineer - July 2008 - 40 Under 40 (Page 28) Consulting-Specifying Engineer - July 2008 - 40 Under 40 (Page 29) Consulting-Specifying Engineer - July 2008 - 40 Under 40 (Page 30) Consulting-Specifying Engineer - July 2008 - 40 Under 40 (Page 31) Consulting-Specifying Engineer - July 2008 - 40 Under 40 (Page 32) Consulting-Specifying Engineer - July 2008 - Using Demand-Based Reset Strategies (Page 33) Consulting-Specifying Engineer - July 2008 - Using Demand-Based Reset Strategies (Page 34) Consulting-Specifying Engineer - July 2008 - Using Demand-Based Reset Strategies (Page 35) Consulting-Specifying Engineer - July 2008 - Using Demand-Based Reset Strategies (Page 36) Consulting-Specifying Engineer - July 2008 - Using Demand-Based Reset Strategies (Page 37) Consulting-Specifying Engineer - July 2008 - Using Demand-Based Reset Strategies (Page 38) Consulting-Specifying Engineer - July 2008 - Using Demand-Based Reset Strategies (Page 39) Consulting-Specifying Engineer - July 2008 - VFDs and Motors: Making the Right Match (Page 40) Consulting-Specifying Engineer - July 2008 - VFDs and Motors: Making the Right Match (Page 41) Consulting-Specifying Engineer - July 2008 - VFDs and Motors: Making the Right Match (Page 42) Consulting-Specifying Engineer - July 2008 - VFDs and Motors: Making the Right Match (Page 43) Consulting-Specifying Engineer - July 2008 - VFDs and Motors: Making the Right Match (Page 44) Consulting-Specifying Engineer - July 2008 - VFDs and Motors: Making the Right Match (Page 45) Consulting-Specifying Engineer - July 2008 - VFDs and Motors: Making the Right Match (Page 46) Consulting-Specifying Engineer - July 2008 - VFDs and Motors: Making the Right Match (Page 47) Consulting-Specifying Engineer - July 2008 - VFDs and Motors: Making the Right Match (Page 48) Consulting-Specifying Engineer - July 2008 - Grounding and Bonding Practices for Hazardous Areas (Page 49) Consulting-Specifying Engineer - July 2008 - Grounding and Bonding Practices for Hazardous Areas (Page 50) Consulting-Specifying Engineer - July 2008 - Grounding and Bonding Practices for Hazardous Areas (Page 51) Consulting-Specifying Engineer - July 2008 - Grounding and Bonding Practices for Hazardous Areas (Page 52) Consulting-Specifying Engineer - July 2008 - Grounding and Bonding Practices for Hazardous Areas (Page 52A) Consulting-Specifying Engineer - July 2008 - Grounding and Bonding Practices for Hazardous Areas (Page 52B) Consulting-Specifying Engineer - July 2008 - Grounding and Bonding Practices for Hazardous Areas (Page 53) Consulting-Specifying Engineer - July 2008 - Codes & Standards (Page 54) Consulting-Specifying Engineer - July 2008 - Codes & Standards (Page 55) Consulting-Specifying Engineer - July 2008 - Case Study (Page 56) Consulting-Specifying Engineer - July 2008 - Case Study (Page 57) Consulting-Specifying Engineer - July 2008 - New Products (Page 58) Consulting-Specifying Engineer - July 2008 - New Products (Page 59) Consulting-Specifying Engineer - July 2008 - Equipment Lifecycles (Page 60) Consulting-Specifying Engineer - July 2008 - Equipment Lifecycles (Page 61) Consulting-Specifying Engineer - July 2008 - Equipment Lifecycles (Page 62) Consulting-Specifying Engineer - July 2008 - Equipment Lifecycles (Page 63) Consulting-Specifying Engineer - July 2008 - Equipment Lifecycles (Page 64) Consulting-Specifying Engineer - July 2008 - Equipment Lifecycles (Page 65) Consulting-Specifying Engineer - July 2008 - Equipment Lifecycles (Page 66) Consulting-Specifying Engineer - July 2008 - Advertiser Index (Page 67) Consulting-Specifying Engineer - July 2008 - Green Space (Page 68) Consulting-Specifying Engineer - July 2008 - Green Space (Page Cover3) Consulting-Specifying Engineer - July 2008 - Green Space (Page Cover4)
For optimal viewing of this digital publication, please enable JavaScript and then refresh the page. If you would like to try to load the digital publication without using Flash Player detection, please click here.