Consulting-Specifying Engineer - September 2008 - (Page 46) Table 1 Advantages and disadvantages of commissioning contractual arrangements Contractual arrangement Advantages Disadvantages Additional contract administration for owner Restricted selection process for public entities Indirect knowledge of design and installation Requires more leadership and team building skills Independent Cx service Direct communication with owner provider contracted direct- Dedicated CxA staff has best interdisciplinary ly to owner mix Unbiased third-party judgment Direct payment from owner Maintains test equipment inventory CxA on staff of, or sub- Best knowledge of owner’s intent Possible conflict when CxA is checking plans of same comcontracted to, architect or pany engineer Familiar with equipment applications on the Lack of operations experience job Interactive “systems” logic and perspective Good test scenario and report writing skills Cx schedule meshes with design schedule CxA is member of owner’s in-house staff No conflict of interest with owner goals Owner needs many projects to support full CxA staff Lack of construction experience Payment problems/delays Knowledge gained during Cx is valuable for Additional personnel for owner O&M Direct responsibility to owner Direct communication with owner Possible lower cost than consultants Scheduling and supervisory work for owner Owner must maintain equipment inventory CxA on staff of, or subcontracted to, general contractor All responsibility is with GC Big picture viewpoint over all construction Close to schedule requirements No additional contract for owner Possible lack of early involvement Conflict with quality in event of schedule/cost problems Payment problems/delays CxA on staff of, or subcontracted to, MEP subcontractor Best understanding of mechanical systems installation and operation Peer relationship with installing contractor Lack of early involvement Biased approach to installation Faster and lower cost by combining Cx with Lack of “disinterested” position requires maximum contractor’s check-out owner oversight No additional contract for owner May lack communications skills Payment problems/delays CxA on staff of, or con- If employee, on-site and available tracted to, on-site con- Unbiased judgment struction manager Direct responsibility to, and communication with, owner No additional contract for owner CxA on staff of, or contracted to, owner’s representative Unbiased third-party judgment Direct responsibility to owner Direct communication with owner No additional contract for owner Indirect involvement with design Indirect knowledge of construction Lack of “systems” training and skills Not a professional engineer Unfamiliar with test equipment CM usually chosen in mid/late design Possible conflict if CM has financial interest in the project May lack “systems” training and skills 46 Consulting-Specifying Engineer • SEPTEMBER 2008
Table of Contents Feed for the Digital Edition of Consulting-Specifying Engineer - September 2008 Consulting-Specifying Engineer - September 2008 Contents Viewpoint Letters News M/ERoundtable Selecting Appropriate Egress Strategies Commissioning On-Site Electrical Systems Mentoring Control Engineers and Technicians Casting Call for Cx Case Study New Products Equipment Lifecycles Advertiser Index Green Space Consulting-Specifying Engineer - September 2008 Consulting-Specifying Engineer - September 2008 - (Page Intro) Consulting-Specifying Engineer - September 2008 - Consulting-Specifying Engineer - September 2008 (Page Cover1) Consulting-Specifying Engineer - September 2008 - Consulting-Specifying Engineer - September 2008 (Page Cover2) Consulting-Specifying Engineer - September 2008 - Consulting-Specifying Engineer - September 2008 (Page 1) Consulting-Specifying Engineer - September 2008 - Consulting-Specifying Engineer - September 2008 (Page 2) Consulting-Specifying Engineer - September 2008 - Contents (Page 3) Consulting-Specifying Engineer - September 2008 - Contents (Page 4) Consulting-Specifying Engineer - September 2008 - Contents (Page 5) Consulting-Specifying Engineer - September 2008 - Contents (Page 6) Consulting-Specifying Engineer - September 2008 - Viewpoint (Page 7) Consulting-Specifying Engineer - September 2008 - Letters (Page 8) Consulting-Specifying Engineer - September 2008 - Letters (Page 9) Consulting-Specifying Engineer - September 2008 - News (Page 10) Consulting-Specifying Engineer - September 2008 - News (Page 11) Consulting-Specifying Engineer - September 2008 - News (Page 12) Consulting-Specifying Engineer - September 2008 - News (Page 13) Consulting-Specifying Engineer - September 2008 - M/ERoundtable (Page 14) Consulting-Specifying Engineer - September 2008 - M/ERoundtable (Page 15) Consulting-Specifying Engineer - September 2008 - M/ERoundtable (Page 16) Consulting-Specifying Engineer - September 2008 - M/ERoundtable (Page 17) Consulting-Specifying Engineer - September 2008 - M/ERoundtable (Page 18) Consulting-Specifying Engineer - September 2008 - M/ERoundtable (Page 19) Consulting-Specifying Engineer - September 2008 - Selecting Appropriate Egress Strategies (Page 20) Consulting-Specifying Engineer - September 2008 - Selecting Appropriate Egress Strategies (Page 21) Consulting-Specifying Engineer - September 2008 - Selecting Appropriate Egress Strategies (Page 22) Consulting-Specifying Engineer - September 2008 - Selecting Appropriate Egress Strategies (Page 23) Consulting-Specifying Engineer - September 2008 - Selecting Appropriate Egress Strategies (Page 24) Consulting-Specifying Engineer - September 2008 - Selecting Appropriate Egress Strategies (Page 25) Consulting-Specifying Engineer - September 2008 - Selecting Appropriate Egress Strategies (Page 26) Consulting-Specifying Engineer - September 2008 - Selecting Appropriate Egress Strategies (Page 27) Consulting-Specifying Engineer - September 2008 - Selecting Appropriate Egress Strategies (Page 28) Consulting-Specifying Engineer - September 2008 - Selecting Appropriate Egress Strategies (Page 29) Consulting-Specifying Engineer - September 2008 - Commissioning On-Site Electrical Systems (Page 30) Consulting-Specifying Engineer - September 2008 - Commissioning On-Site Electrical Systems (Page 31) Consulting-Specifying Engineer - September 2008 - Commissioning On-Site Electrical Systems (Page 32) Consulting-Specifying Engineer - September 2008 - Commissioning On-Site Electrical Systems (Page 33) Consulting-Specifying Engineer - September 2008 - Commissioning On-Site Electrical Systems (Page 34) Consulting-Specifying Engineer - September 2008 - Commissioning On-Site Electrical Systems (Page 35) Consulting-Specifying Engineer - September 2008 - Mentoring Control Engineers and Technicians (Page 36) Consulting-Specifying Engineer - September 2008 - Mentoring Control Engineers and Technicians (Page 37) Consulting-Specifying Engineer - September 2008 - Mentoring Control Engineers and Technicians (Page 38) Consulting-Specifying Engineer - September 2008 - Mentoring Control Engineers and Technicians (Page 39) Consulting-Specifying Engineer - September 2008 - Mentoring Control Engineers and Technicians (Page 40) Consulting-Specifying Engineer - September 2008 - Mentoring Control Engineers and Technicians (Page 41) Consulting-Specifying Engineer - September 2008 - Mentoring Control Engineers and Technicians (Page 42) Consulting-Specifying Engineer - September 2008 - Mentoring Control Engineers and Technicians (Page 43) Consulting-Specifying Engineer - September 2008 - Casting Call for Cx (Page 44) Consulting-Specifying Engineer - September 2008 - Casting Call for Cx (Page 45) Consulting-Specifying Engineer - September 2008 - Casting Call for Cx (Page 46) Consulting-Specifying Engineer - September 2008 - Casting Call for Cx (Page 47) Consulting-Specifying Engineer - September 2008 - Casting Call for Cx (Page 48) Consulting-Specifying Engineer - September 2008 - Casting Call for Cx (Page 49) Consulting-Specifying Engineer - September 2008 - Casting Call for Cx (Page 50) Consulting-Specifying Engineer - September 2008 - Casting Call for Cx (Page 51) Consulting-Specifying Engineer - September 2008 - Case Study (Page 52) Consulting-Specifying Engineer - September 2008 - Case Study (Page 53) Consulting-Specifying Engineer - September 2008 - New Products (Page 54) Consulting-Specifying Engineer - September 2008 - New Products (Page 55) Consulting-Specifying Engineer - September 2008 - New Products (Page 56) Consulting-Specifying Engineer - September 2008 - New Products (Page 57) Consulting-Specifying Engineer - September 2008 - New Products (Page 58) Consulting-Specifying Engineer - September 2008 - New Products (Page 59) Consulting-Specifying Engineer - September 2008 - New Products (Page 60) Consulting-Specifying Engineer - September 2008 - Equipment Lifecycles (Page 61) Consulting-Specifying Engineer - September 2008 - Equipment Lifecycles (Page 62) Consulting-Specifying Engineer - September 2008 - Equipment Lifecycles (Page 63) Consulting-Specifying Engineer - September 2008 - Equipment Lifecycles (Page 64) Consulting-Specifying Engineer - September 2008 - Equipment Lifecycles (Page 65) Consulting-Specifying Engineer - September 2008 - Equipment Lifecycles (Page 66) Consulting-Specifying Engineer - September 2008 - Equipment Lifecycles (Page 67) Consulting-Specifying Engineer - September 2008 - Equipment Lifecycles (Page 68) Consulting-Specifying Engineer - September 2008 - Equipment Lifecycles (Page 69) Consulting-Specifying Engineer - September 2008 - Equipment Lifecycles (Page 70) Consulting-Specifying Engineer - September 2008 - Advertiser Index (Page 71) Consulting-Specifying Engineer - September 2008 - Green Space (Page 72) Consulting-Specifying Engineer - September 2008 - Green Space (Page Cover3) Consulting-Specifying Engineer - September 2008 - Green Space (Page Cover4)
For optimal viewing of this digital publication, please enable JavaScript and then refresh the page. If you would like to try to load the digital publication without using Flash Player detection, please click here.