Consulting-Specifying Engineer - October 2008 - (Page 72) Codes & Standards Series method of AIC ratings A series AIC rating is defined by Cutler-Hammer as “A short-circuit interrupting rating assigned to a combination of two or more over-current protection devices. The short-circuit rating of the upstream device (main) fully rated system, and series-connected system. A selectively coordinated system is a system in which “all breakers are fully rated, and upstream breakers must have adequate short-time withstand ratings and short time delay adjusting must comply with National Electric Code 240.86 requirements, specifically marking, motor contribution, and engineering supervision in existing installations. Testing requirements The tests required by UL for a single breaker are: • Calibration of the test breaker • “O” test in which the fault is initiated with the breaker in the closed position • “CO” test in which the same breaker is closed on the fault • Calibration test to ensure the breaker is still functional • Dielectric test. The testing required for a series rating is the same testing as noted above for the main and branch circuit breakers individually—the interrupting ability and the intermediate ability tests. Depending on the results of these tests, additional testing may be required. In addition, UL may require follow-up testing. Pay is principal and electrical department head of FEA Consulting Engineers. He is an expert in low- and medium-voltage distribution system design. REFERENCES Beatty, Bill. 100% Rated Molded Case Circuit Breakers. White paper, 1994. Beatty, Bill. Series Ratings and Molded Case Circuit Breakers. White paper, 1994. Bussmann Mfg. Division. Engineering Dependable Protection for an Electrical Distribution System – Part I A Simple Approach to Short Circuit Calculations. St. Louis: McGraw-Edison Co., 1968. National Electrical Manufacturers Assn. Series Ratings, Molded Case Circuit Breaker Section, National Electrical Manufacturers Assn., 1994. National Fire Protection Assn. (NFPA). National Electrical Code (NEC). Clifton Park, N.Y.: Delmar Cengage Learning, 2005. In a series-connected system, “low-level arcing faults are still cleared by the downstream breaker alone.” However, under high fault conditions, both the upstream and downstream breakers would open, eliminating service to the affected portion of the system. must be at least equal to the available system fault current. The high interrupting capacity rating of the downstream device can be less, providing factory tests have been conducted to verify the combination rating.” Typically, the fault current is calculated at every point within the system. The main switchboard will have an AIC rating calculated by the methods shown above. Then, all of the devices at the main switchboard will have an AIC rating that is the same based on the interrupting capacity determined in the calculations. For example, if the fault current calculation was 72,300 amps at the main switchboard, the next standard AIC rating would be selected. A 100,000 AIC rated switchboard usually is specified. All of the circuit breakers at the main switchboard, including the main and the distribution circuit breakers, have the same AIC rating of 100,000. In the series rating method, the main breaker would have an AIC rating of 100,000, but the distribution breakers on the main switchboard can have a rating less than 100,000, based on factory tests of the combination of the breakers. The combination of the two breakers is rated at 100,000. Cutler-Hammer defines three types of systems: selectively coordinated system, capabilities.” This type of system has the highest reliability, requires calculations for the entire system, and is the most expensive of the three noted by Cutler-Hammer. In addition, fuses are sometimes required to obtain selective coordination. A fully rated system is a system in which “all the over-current protective devices have a short circuit interrupting rating at least equal to the available short circuit current.” This type of system is less reliable than a selectively coordinated system because multiple breakers may open during a fault and it requires calculations for the entire system. A fully rated system is less expensive than a selectively coordinated system. In a series-connected system, “low-level arcing faults are still cleared by the downstream breaker alone.” However, under high fault conditions, both the upstream and downstream breakers would open, eliminating service to the affected portion of the system. This type of system operates similarly to the fully rated system where multiple breakers may open to clear the fault; however, it does not require calculations for the entire system because tables are used to determine the required combination. This system is the least expensive of the three types. If a series-connected system is used, it also 72 Consulting-Specifying Engineer • OCTOBER 2008
Table of Contents Feed for the Digital Edition of Consulting-Specifying Engineer - October 2008 Consulting-Specifying Engineer - October 2008 Contents Viewpoint Letters News M/E Roundtable Cities Under One Roof Eight Design Tips for Integration Is 'Green' Really New? Down the Drain Product of the Year Awards Codes & Standards Case Study New Products Equipment Lifecycles Advertiser Index Green Space Consulting-Specifying Engineer - October 2008 Consulting-Specifying Engineer - October 2008 - Consulting-Specifying Engineer - October 2008 (Page Cover1) Consulting-Specifying Engineer - October 2008 - Consulting-Specifying Engineer - October 2008 (Page Cover2) Consulting-Specifying Engineer - October 2008 - Consulting-Specifying Engineer - October 2008 (Page 1) Consulting-Specifying Engineer - October 2008 - Consulting-Specifying Engineer - October 2008 (Page 2) Consulting-Specifying Engineer - October 2008 - Contents (Page 3) Consulting-Specifying Engineer - October 2008 - Contents (Page 4) Consulting-Specifying Engineer - October 2008 - Contents (Page 5) Consulting-Specifying Engineer - October 2008 - Contents (Page 6) Consulting-Specifying Engineer - October 2008 - Viewpoint (Page 7) Consulting-Specifying Engineer - October 2008 - Letters (Page 8) Consulting-Specifying Engineer - October 2008 - Letters (Page 9) Consulting-Specifying Engineer - October 2008 - Letters (Page 10) Consulting-Specifying Engineer - October 2008 - Letters (Page 11) Consulting-Specifying Engineer - October 2008 - News (Page 12) Consulting-Specifying Engineer - October 2008 - News (Page 13) Consulting-Specifying Engineer - October 2008 - News (Page 14) Consulting-Specifying Engineer - October 2008 - News (Page 15) Consulting-Specifying Engineer - October 2008 - M/E Roundtable (Page 16) Consulting-Specifying Engineer - October 2008 - M/E Roundtable (Page 17) Consulting-Specifying Engineer - October 2008 - M/E Roundtable (Page 18) Consulting-Specifying Engineer - October 2008 - M/E Roundtable (Page 19) Consulting-Specifying Engineer - October 2008 - M/E Roundtable (Page 20) Consulting-Specifying Engineer - October 2008 - M/E Roundtable (Page 21) Consulting-Specifying Engineer - October 2008 - M/E Roundtable (Page 22) Consulting-Specifying Engineer - October 2008 - M/E Roundtable (Page 23) Consulting-Specifying Engineer - October 2008 - Cities Under One Roof (Page 24) Consulting-Specifying Engineer - October 2008 - Cities Under One Roof (Page 25) Consulting-Specifying Engineer - October 2008 - Cities Under One Roof (Page 26) Consulting-Specifying Engineer - October 2008 - Cities Under One Roof (Page 27) Consulting-Specifying Engineer - October 2008 - Cities Under One Roof (Page 28) Consulting-Specifying Engineer - October 2008 - Cities Under One Roof (Page 29) Consulting-Specifying Engineer - October 2008 - Cities Under One Roof (Page 30) Consulting-Specifying Engineer - October 2008 - Cities Under One Roof (Page 31) Consulting-Specifying Engineer - October 2008 - Cities Under One Roof (Page 32) Consulting-Specifying Engineer - October 2008 - Cities Under One Roof (Page 33) Consulting-Specifying Engineer - October 2008 - Eight Design Tips for Integration (Page 34) Consulting-Specifying Engineer - October 2008 - Eight Design Tips for Integration (Page 35) Consulting-Specifying Engineer - October 2008 - Eight Design Tips for Integration (Page 36) Consulting-Specifying Engineer - October 2008 - Eight Design Tips for Integration (Page 37) Consulting-Specifying Engineer - October 2008 - Eight Design Tips for Integration (Page 38) Consulting-Specifying Engineer - October 2008 - Eight Design Tips for Integration (Page 39) Consulting-Specifying Engineer - October 2008 - Eight Design Tips for Integration (Page 40) Consulting-Specifying Engineer - October 2008 - Is 'Green' Really New? (Page 41) Consulting-Specifying Engineer - October 2008 - Is 'Green' Really New? (Page 42) Consulting-Specifying Engineer - October 2008 - Is 'Green' Really New? (Page 43) Consulting-Specifying Engineer - October 2008 - Is 'Green' Really New? (Page 44) Consulting-Specifying Engineer - October 2008 - Is 'Green' Really New? (Page 45) Consulting-Specifying Engineer - October 2008 - Is 'Green' Really New? (Page 46) Consulting-Specifying Engineer - October 2008 - Is 'Green' Really New? (Page 47) Consulting-Specifying Engineer - October 2008 - Is 'Green' Really New? (Page 48) Consulting-Specifying Engineer - October 2008 - Is 'Green' Really New? (Page 48A) Consulting-Specifying Engineer - October 2008 - Is 'Green' Really New? (Page 48B) Consulting-Specifying Engineer - October 2008 - Is 'Green' Really New? (Page 49) Consulting-Specifying Engineer - October 2008 - Down the Drain (Page 50) Consulting-Specifying Engineer - October 2008 - Down the Drain (Page 51) Consulting-Specifying Engineer - October 2008 - Down the Drain (Page 52) Consulting-Specifying Engineer - October 2008 - Down the Drain (Page 53) Consulting-Specifying Engineer - October 2008 - Product of the Year Awards (Page 54) Consulting-Specifying Engineer - October 2008 - Product of the Year Awards (Page 55) Consulting-Specifying Engineer - October 2008 - Product of the Year Awards (Page 56) Consulting-Specifying Engineer - October 2008 - Product of the Year Awards (Page 57) Consulting-Specifying Engineer - October 2008 - Product of the Year Awards (Page 58) Consulting-Specifying Engineer - October 2008 - Product of the Year Awards (Page 59) Consulting-Specifying Engineer - October 2008 - Product of the Year Awards (Page 60) Consulting-Specifying Engineer - October 2008 - Product of the Year Awards (Page 61) Consulting-Specifying Engineer - October 2008 - Product of the Year Awards (Page 62) Consulting-Specifying Engineer - October 2008 - Product of the Year Awards (Page 63) Consulting-Specifying Engineer - October 2008 - Product of the Year Awards (Page 64) Consulting-Specifying Engineer - October 2008 - Product of the Year Awards (Page 65) Consulting-Specifying Engineer - October 2008 - Product of the Year Awards (Page 66) Consulting-Specifying Engineer - October 2008 - Product of the Year Awards (Page 67) Consulting-Specifying Engineer - October 2008 - Product of the Year Awards (Page 68) Consulting-Specifying Engineer - October 2008 - Product of the Year Awards (Page 69) Consulting-Specifying Engineer - October 2008 - Codes & Standards (Page 70) Consulting-Specifying Engineer - October 2008 - Codes & Standards (Page 71) Consulting-Specifying Engineer - October 2008 - Codes & Standards (Page 72) Consulting-Specifying Engineer - October 2008 - Codes & Standards (Page 73) Consulting-Specifying Engineer - October 2008 - Codes & Standards (Page 74) Consulting-Specifying Engineer - October 2008 - Case Study (Page 75) Consulting-Specifying Engineer - October 2008 - Case Study (Page 76) Consulting-Specifying Engineer - October 2008 - Case Study (Page 77) Consulting-Specifying Engineer - October 2008 - New Products (Page 78) Consulting-Specifying Engineer - October 2008 - New Products (Page 79) Consulting-Specifying Engineer - October 2008 - New Products (Page 80) Consulting-Specifying Engineer - October 2008 - New Products (Page 81) Consulting-Specifying Engineer - October 2008 - New Products (Page 82) Consulting-Specifying Engineer - October 2008 - New Products (Page 83) Consulting-Specifying Engineer - October 2008 - New Products (Page 84) Consulting-Specifying Engineer - October 2008 - Equipment Lifecycles (Page 85) Consulting-Specifying Engineer - October 2008 - Equipment Lifecycles (Page 86) Consulting-Specifying Engineer - October 2008 - Equipment Lifecycles (Page 87) Consulting-Specifying Engineer - October 2008 - Equipment Lifecycles (Page 88) Consulting-Specifying Engineer - October 2008 - Equipment Lifecycles (Page 89) Consulting-Specifying Engineer - October 2008 - Equipment Lifecycles (Page 90) Consulting-Specifying Engineer - October 2008 - Equipment Lifecycles (Page 91) Consulting-Specifying Engineer - October 2008 - Equipment Lifecycles (Page 92) Consulting-Specifying Engineer - October 2008 - Equipment Lifecycles (Page 93) Consulting-Specifying Engineer - October 2008 - Equipment Lifecycles (Page 94) Consulting-Specifying Engineer - October 2008 - Advertiser Index (Page 95) Consulting-Specifying Engineer - October 2008 - Green Space (Page 96) Consulting-Specifying Engineer - October 2008 - Green Space (Page Cover3) Consulting-Specifying Engineer - October 2008 - Green Space (Page Cover4)
For optimal viewing of this digital publication, please enable JavaScript and then refresh the page. If you would like to try to load the digital publication without using Flash Player detection, please click here.