Railway Track & Structures - July 2008 - (Page 35) The plastic ties continue to withstand HAL traffic at FAST and in revenue service. They are installed out of face and intermixed with wood ties, fastened with both cut spikes and screw spikes. So far, there has been more tie plate breakage than on wood ties. The lower bending strength of plastic ties appears to allow more plate bending. In 2008, the tests will include Vossloh 18-inch plates with drive spikes and screw spikes; MSFR 16-inch plates with screw spikes; NorFast 18inch plates with both drive spikes and screw spikes, leading edge plates with screw spikes, conventional 128-inch tie plates with cut spikes and Pandrol rolled plates with screw spikes (replicate from previous test) and drive spikes. The researchers will be looking at component evaluation, system performance, loads and load paths. According to a recent Technology Digest, premium test rails at both mega sites, one on Union Pacific and one on Norfolk Southern, continue to show excellent wear resistance, losing less than 2.1 percent of the total head area after 114 mgt in the 10-degree test curves at the eastern site and less than 2.4 percent after 494 mgt in the twodegree test curves at the western site. Without preventive grinding in the test curves, rolling contact fatigue developed after 300-350 mgt on the low rails in the two-degree test curves. Corrective grinding was required at 375 mgt to remove RCF. At the eastern site, wide-gap welds continue to show good performance with no surface or internal defect identified after 123 mgt of traffic. Track fasteners Tim Austin of Lewis Bolt & Nut Co. described improvements in track fasteners for heavy-haul areas in a paper presented at AREMA in September 2007. “The increasing stresses of heavy axle load traffic have placed greater demands on the fasteners used in track compo- nents,” Austin said. “Just as all other components have needed to adjust to the higher stress environment, there has been a movement to upgrade standards for spikes, bolts and screws that were in place for many years to more robust designs. In addition to the proliferation of 286,000-pound cars and the potential for 315,000-pound, higher speeds, more traffic and the use of continuously welded rail have also put increased demands on the fastening systems. The increased lateral loads from higher speeds and modern equipment place demands on special trackwork and curves, leading to new systems to resist the loads and fight rail rollover. The widespread use of continuously welded rail has placed thermal loads on components in some locations. “The need to resist greater loads has led to a general trend to make the fasteners larger and make them out of higher-strength and better-controlled materials,” he noted. “Many fasteners traditionally used in limited applications have found more widespread use as more places began to see the vulnerabilities of the legacy fastening systems. “Maintenance-of-way practices have changed to accommodate and make better use of the new fasteners and applications,” he pointed out. “In some cases, maintenance practices have needed to change significantly to properly install and take advantage of higher strength fasteners. In other cases, wider usage of parts has forced a look at installation methods to keep work crews productive.” Austin continued: “The track spike has seen modest changes. It has been replaced by screw spikes in some special trackwork and curves on some roads, but the track spike is still the norm in the vast majority of track. In 2005, AREMA Committee 5 updated the track spike specification, which had been unchanged since 1968.” The 2005 specification applied upper limits on the carbon and more control over other elements in the steel. Limits were applied to manganese, silicon phosphorus and sulfur, while vanadium was added to the chemistry. The optional minimum copper content for corrosion resistance was made mandatory. The minimum yield strength was effectively increased and an on-request impact property test was added. The dimensions remained unchanged. Overall, the 2005 version of the standards eliminated a lot of potential variability that was allowed under the 1968 version and resulted in more consistent performance. “Probably no fastener has seen more changes in usage and design than the screw spike (a.k.a. lag screw or coach screw),” Austin said. “The higher lateral loads of special trackwork and curves frequently exceed the ability of a track spike to maintain gauge and hold the rail in place. Screw spikes are typically used to affix plates when elastic fasteners are used. Under static conditions a track spike can be pulled out with about 7,000 pounds. A 15/16-inch screw spike typically will take 15,000 pounds or more. Moving the spikes farther from the rail base, as on a typical elastic fastener plate, also gives them more leverage to prevent rail rollover. How well the spikes stay in place under dynamic loads is probably more important. However, very little work has been done to quantify such conditions.” The only standard currently addressing screw spikes is ASTM A66. It specifies minimum 60,000 psi tensile and gives some guidance on testing and tolerances. It does not give any specifics on configuration, dimensions, or chemistry. Screw spikes are typically available in many head and thread configurations and diameters from 3/4-inch to one inch. Three common combinations account for most of the market. There are three typical ranges in which material properties are generally specified, ranging from 60,000 to www.rtands.com Railway Track & Structures July 2008 35 http://www.rtands.com
Table of Contents Feed for the Digital Edition of Railway Track & Structures - July 2008 Railway Track & Structures - July 2008 On Track Industry Today Supplier News AREMA News NRC News TTCI R&D Products and Literature People Calendar Sales Representatives Website Directory Advertisers Index Professional Directory Classified Advertising Chicago Perspective Extending Service Life for Costly Special Trackwork Rail Welding Gets Act Together Premium Fasteners, Rail Steels Help Meet Strain of Heavy Haul Railway Track & Structures - July 2008 Railway Track & Structures - July 2008 - Railway Track & Structures - July 2008 (Page Cover1) Railway Track & Structures - July 2008 - Railway Track & Structures - July 2008 (Page Cover2) Railway Track & Structures - July 2008 - Railway Track & Structures - July 2008 (Page 1) Railway Track & Structures - July 2008 - Railway Track & Structures - July 2008 (Page 2) Railway Track & Structures - July 2008 - On Track (Page 3) Railway Track & Structures - July 2008 - On Track (Page 4) Railway Track & Structures - July 2008 - Industry Today (Page 5) Railway Track & Structures - July 2008 - Industry Today (Page 6) Railway Track & Structures - July 2008 - Supplier News (Page 7) Railway Track & Structures - July 2008 - Supplier News (Page 8) Railway Track & Structures - July 2008 - AREMA News (Page 9) Railway Track & Structures - July 2008 - AREMA News (Page 10) Railway Track & Structures - July 2008 - AREMA News (Page 11) Railway Track & Structures - July 2008 - AREMA News (Page 12) Railway Track & Structures - July 2008 - AREMA News (Page 13) Railway Track & Structures - July 2008 - AREMA News (Page 14) Railway Track & Structures - July 2008 - AREMA News (Page 15) Railway Track & Structures - July 2008 - NRC News (Page 16) Railway Track & Structures - July 2008 - TTCI R&D (Page 17) Railway Track & Structures - July 2008 - TTCI R&D (Page 18) Railway Track & Structures - July 2008 - TTCI R&D (Page 19) Railway Track & Structures - July 2008 - TTCI R&D (Page 20) Railway Track & Structures - July 2008 - Extending Service Life for Costly Special Trackwork (Page 21) Railway Track & Structures - July 2008 - Extending Service Life for Costly Special Trackwork (Page 22) Railway Track & Structures - July 2008 - Extending Service Life for Costly Special Trackwork (Page 23) Railway Track & Structures - July 2008 - Extending Service Life for Costly Special Trackwork (Page 24) Railway Track & Structures - July 2008 - Extending Service Life for Costly Special Trackwork (Page 25) Railway Track & Structures - July 2008 - Extending Service Life for Costly Special Trackwork (Page 26) Railway Track & Structures - July 2008 - Extending Service Life for Costly Special Trackwork (Page 27) Railway Track & Structures - July 2008 - Extending Service Life for Costly Special Trackwork (Page 28) Railway Track & Structures - July 2008 - Extending Service Life for Costly Special Trackwork (Page 29) Railway Track & Structures - July 2008 - Rail Welding Gets Act Together (Page 30) Railway Track & Structures - July 2008 - Rail Welding Gets Act Together (Page 31) Railway Track & Structures - July 2008 - Rail Welding Gets Act Together (Page 32) Railway Track & Structures - July 2008 - Rail Welding Gets Act Together (Page 33) Railway Track & Structures - July 2008 - Premium Fasteners, Rail Steels Help Meet Strain of Heavy Haul (Page 34) Railway Track & Structures - July 2008 - Premium Fasteners, Rail Steels Help Meet Strain of Heavy Haul (Page 35) Railway Track & Structures - July 2008 - Premium Fasteners, Rail Steels Help Meet Strain of Heavy Haul (Page 36) Railway Track & Structures - July 2008 - Premium Fasteners, Rail Steels Help Meet Strain of Heavy Haul (Page 37) Railway Track & Structures - July 2008 - Products and Literature (Page 38) Railway Track & Structures - July 2008 - People (Page 39) Railway Track & Structures - July 2008 - Sales Representatives (Page 40) Railway Track & Structures - July 2008 - Website Directory (Page 41) Railway Track & Structures - July 2008 - Advertisers Index (Page 42) Railway Track & Structures - July 2008 - Professional Directory (Page 43) Railway Track & Structures - July 2008 - Classified Advertising (Page 44) Railway Track & Structures - July 2008 - Classified Advertising (Page 45) Railway Track & Structures - July 2008 - Classified Advertising (Page 46) Railway Track & Structures - July 2008 - Classified Advertising (Page 47) Railway Track & Structures - July 2008 - Chicago Perspective (Page 48) Railway Track & Structures - July 2008 - Chicago Perspective (Page Cover3) Railway Track & Structures - July 2008 - Chicago Perspective (Page Cover4)
For optimal viewing of this digital publication, please enable JavaScript and then refresh the page. If you would like to try to load the digital publication without using Flash Player detection, please click here.