Streaming Media - 2008 Industry Sourcebook - (Page 60) •• industry update FUTUREWATCH: EDUCATION the year hile colleges and universities are often sites of technological innovation, when it comes to widespread adoption of new technologies they often follow rather than lead. However, I think that the gap between enterprise and consumer on one side and education on the other is narrowing. So the trends I think we’ll see in 2008 for educational video don’t look a lot different than what we see in these other verticals. I recall just a little more than 2 years ago at Streaming Media West 2005, a big question up for discussion was “Is streaming dead?” Podcasting had only recently burst on the scene. At the same time, broadband penetration finally was reaching levels that made downloading content feasible. Still, HD—and its bigger bandwidth requirements—seemed a long way off. A lot of bloggers and observers were ready to predict the imminent obsolescence of streaming. Flash-forward to 2007 and the big industry headlines are about the CDN market; that’s where the big money’s going too. Podcasting and downloading haven’t gone away. But as your average internet user acquires a taste for experiences beyond 320x240, the appetite for bandwidth grows gluttonous. Streaming is a big deal again because it’s still an efficient way to deliver and manage high-bandwidth content. Just like NBC and Metacafe, schools and universities are facing the question of but how to deliver an expanding library of media. The days of running a single streaming server are coming to an end. Increasingly educational institutions are going to have to look at content distribution like they look at other network and telecommunications services. In the same way, they will be faced with the question of building their own infrastructure or outsourcing. In 2008 we’re going to see an increasing number of educational institutions considering CDNs to help them manage distribution.. One way that some schools can sidestep the distribution conundrum is by taking advantage of solutions that are being offered free to them, like Apple’s iTunes U, Google Video, and countless startups. Oursourcing your institution’s hosting, distribution, and bandwidth for free is pretty attractive if you can deal with the restrictions, such as limited support for security features or true streaming. Nevermind the question of when free turns to fee. Of course, YouTube and its offspring are having another effect on the academy. Just as user-generated content is a huge topic in the streaming media industry, I’m hearing more educators talk about how they might leverage student-generated content. There are a few issues here. First, what kind of student content do schools want? Second, what’s the purpose of having all this ahead Paul Riismandel w video? In the dot-com world the answer is pretty simple: to monetize it (even if the question of how isn’t so simple). But what’s the instructional goal? To motivate students to be constructively creative? To foster a sense of creativity? Or just to keep up with the Joneses, Stanfords, and Harvards? Finally, a big issue is who sees all that video. Privacy concerns must be addressed when student videos are made public. None of these questions are roadblocks; they’re just speed bumps to be smoothed out by each institution according to its outlook and needs. Yet there’s still a larger question looming in the background: how to organize all this stuff? Dozens of commercial solutions are available … for a price. But merely posting links to video streams and podcast downloads on course websites isn’t cutting it any longer. Both consumer-oriented sites and the enterprise sector were ahead of the curve on this one, though many of the solutions geared to these verticals are too big and bloated for education or priced out of most schools’ reach. Schools that use a CDN or a free service like iTunes U typically get some level of content management and search as part of the deal. But schools that host their own content face a rougher road. The even bigger challenge is not just content at a particular educational institution, but finding educational video in general. Apple has a head start in that space with iTunes U. But I don’t imagine that you can find 10% of the educational video on the internet within the House of Jobs. A better video search engine has yet to be built, and there are any number of players who want to get into that game. But good search results alone are not necessarily sufficient for the student or teacher looking for quality educational content. Here’s a place where academia might be able to take the lead rather than follow. While schools often compete for the best students and teachers, the institutions also subscribe to an ethic of sharing and cooperation. Here there lies an opportunity for schools to come together and find a way to share content by making it more easily indexed, searched, and accessed. Like the rest of the streaming industry, the year ahead shows no sign of stagnancy for educators. Now is not the time to hesitate; opportunities for a better world of online education lie ahead. bio Paul Riismandel (p-riism@uiuc.edu) is the manager of digital media production for the College of Liberal Arts and Sciences at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign. Comments? Contact us at letters@streamingmedia.com, or check the masthead for other ways to contact us. 60 STREAMING MEDIA INDUSTRY SOURCEBOOK 2008
For optimal viewing of this digital publication, please enable JavaScript and then refresh the page. If you would like to try to load the digital publication without using Flash Player detection, please click here.