Managing Automation - March 2009 - (Page 50) robert malone NEXT The Leading Edge robomalone@aol.com A look at the educational backgrounds of business and manufacturing leaders provides a clue to what kind of leadership the auto industry needs now. Many business and technology leaders have something in common: While some hold advanced academic degrees and some have only technical know-how, none has a business degree. Jack Welch, former CEO of General Electric, holds advanced degrees in science from the University of Massachusetts at Amherst and the University of Illinois Urbana-Champagne. Steve Jobs, Apple Computer’s CEO, is a Reed College dropout. William Gates, Microsoft founder and CEO, is a Harvard dropout. Michael Dell, founder and CEO of Dell Computers, is a University of Texas dropout. Dean Kamen, inventor and CEO of Segway, is a Worcester Polytechnic Institute dropout. Pierre Omidyar, an eBay founder, has a computer science degree from Tufts. Larry Page, co-founder of Google, has computer engineering degrees from the University of Michigan and Stanford University, and has completed work toward a doctorate in computer science. Sergey Brin, the other Google co-founder, has degrees from the University of Maryland, College Park, and Stanford, and is enrolled in a doctoral program in computer science at Stanford. These people are known for their innovation, success, and leadership in starting and, in many cases, running productive companies. Now, let’s look at the U.S. automotive industry. Rick Wagoner, General Motors CEO, has an MBA from Harvard. Bob Nardelli, CEO of Chrysler, has an MBA from the University of Louisville. And Alan Mulally, CEO of Ford, has a master’s degree in science as well as a Sloan Management (MIT) master’s degree in management. All of these business school graduates have their hands out for government assistance, yet their companies’ track records over the past three decades offer little justification for such largesse. Now, how were the founders of the big three automakers trained and educated? Walter Chrysler was a master mechanic in the railroad industry. William Durant, GM’s founder, was a high school dropout. Alfred Sloan, the longtime head of GM, was an electrical engineering graduate of MIT. He created the ideas of auto styling, yearly change, and the “ladder of success,” a concept that kept GM buyers loyal through movement up the scale, from Chevrolet to Pontiac, to Oldsmobile, to Buick, to Cadillac. Henry Ford started as a watch repairman and then became an apprentice machinist and engineer before founding Ford Motor Co. The auto company founders, essentially mechanics, more closely resemble the business-technology leaders, with engineering knowledge but no MBAs. We might well ask what they teach in Harvard’s MBA program. They require 11 courses that are dominated by finance and business strategy. The word “manufacture” comes up in only one course, described as “technology and operations management.” There is no mention of engineering. It appears the curriculum is seriously off-course. The problem isn’t only Harvard’s. MBA programs tend to look at manufacturing through an opaque lens filtered by a dollar bill. It is not a question of getting back to basics so much as a need for a perspective that highlights quality, imagination, and innovation in the specific processes of making things. ■ Robert Malone, based in New York, is principal of Robert Malone Associates and former editor-in-chief of Managing Automation. maonline managingautomation.com For more of Robert Malone’s views, visit: ❑ Mismanaging Miracles www.managingautomation .com/next58 ❑ The Long View www.managingautomation .com/next57 ❑ A Grain of Sand www.managingautomation .com/next56 ma 50 2009 March Photo: Dirk Kikstra http://www.managingautomation.com http://www.managingautomation.com/next58 http://www.managingautomation.com/next57 http://www.managingautomation.com/next56
Table of Contents Feed for the Digital Edition of Managing Automation - March 2009 Managing Automation - March 2009 Contents Take 1 Sober Outlook, Cost-Cutting Techniques Dominate at Automation Conference Sale Canceled, i2 Searches for Its Focus Accenture Unveils a Service for the Factory Floor Solar Is Bright Spot for MES Player Eyelit Other Industries Outspent Auto on Robots in 2008 Integrators to Play a Bigger Role at ILS Technology Notes Deep Dive Supply Chains Reader Poll Technology Directions Expert Q&A User Resources Special Report Transformation Product Scan Advertiser Index Next Managing Automation - March 2009 Managing Automation - March 2009 - Managing Automation - March 2009 (Page Cover1) Managing Automation - March 2009 - Managing Automation - March 2009 (Page Cover2) Managing Automation - March 2009 - Contents (Page 3) Managing Automation - March 2009 - Contents (Page 4) Managing Automation - March 2009 - Contents (Page 5) Managing Automation - March 2009 - Take 1 (Page 6) Managing Automation - March 2009 - Take 1 (Page 7) Managing Automation - March 2009 - Sober Outlook, Cost-Cutting Techniques Dominate at Automation Conference (Page 8) Managing Automation - March 2009 - Sale Canceled, i2 Searches for Its Focus (Page 9) Managing Automation - March 2009 - Sale Canceled, i2 Searches for Its Focus (Page 10) Managing Automation - March 2009 - Solar Is Bright Spot for MES Player Eyelit (Page 11) Managing Automation - March 2009 - Other Industries Outspent Auto on Robots in 2008 (Page 12) Managing Automation - March 2009 - Integrators to Play a Bigger Role at ILS Technology (Page 13) Managing Automation - March 2009 - Integrators to Play a Bigger Role at ILS Technology (Page 14) Managing Automation - March 2009 - Integrators to Play a Bigger Role at ILS Technology (Page 15) Managing Automation - March 2009 - Notes (Page 16) Managing Automation - March 2009 - Notes (Page 17) Managing Automation - March 2009 - Deep Dive Supply Chains (Page 18) Managing Automation - March 2009 - Deep Dive Supply Chains (Page 19) Managing Automation - March 2009 - Deep Dive Supply Chains (Page 20) Managing Automation - March 2009 - Reader Poll (Page 21) Managing Automation - March 2009 - Reader Poll (Page 22) Managing Automation - March 2009 - Reader Poll (Page 23) Managing Automation - March 2009 - Technology Directions (Page 24) Managing Automation - March 2009 - Technology Directions (Page 25) Managing Automation - March 2009 - Technology Directions (Page 26) Managing Automation - March 2009 - Expert Q&A (Page 27) Managing Automation - March 2009 - User Resources (Page 28) Managing Automation - March 2009 - User Resources (Page 29) Managing Automation - March 2009 - Special Report (Page 30) Managing Automation - March 2009 - Special Report (Page 31) Managing Automation - March 2009 - Special Report (Page 32) Managing Automation - March 2009 - Special Report (Page 33) Managing Automation - March 2009 - Special Report (Page 34) Managing Automation - March 2009 - Special Report (Page 35) Managing Automation - March 2009 - Transformation (Page 36) Managing Automation - March 2009 - Transformation (Page 37) Managing Automation - March 2009 - Transformation (Page 38) Managing Automation - March 2009 - Transformation (Page 39) Managing Automation - March 2009 - Transformation (Page 40) Managing Automation - March 2009 - Transformation (Page 41) Managing Automation - March 2009 - Transformation (Page 42) Managing Automation - March 2009 - Transformation (Page 43) Managing Automation - March 2009 - Product Scan (Page 44) Managing Automation - March 2009 - Product Scan (Page 45) Managing Automation - March 2009 - Product Scan (Page 46) Managing Automation - March 2009 - Product Scan (Page 47) Managing Automation - March 2009 - Product Scan (Page 48) Managing Automation - March 2009 - Advertiser Index (Page 49) Managing Automation - March 2009 - Next (Page 50) Managing Automation - March 2009 - Next (Page Cover3) Managing Automation - March 2009 - Next (Page Cover4)
For optimal viewing of this digital publication, please enable JavaScript and then refresh the page. If you would like to try to load the digital publication without using Flash Player detection, please click here.