Managing Automation - April 2008 - (Page 34) [APRIL 2008] [ INTEGRATION ] Transformation Integration TechWatch BLINDFOLD Next-generation B2B networks are built as SaaS e-business hubs that share applications across the partner network, manage processes, and provide critical visibility. BY STEPHANIE NEIL takingOFF the erhaps it’s time to throw out the term, “supply chain.” It contains an inherent flaw: One slipup in the sequence of events — a break in the chain — brings the whole business-to-business (B2B) system to a screeching halt. Manufacturers can’t afford that. Even the B2B platforms introduced in the 1990s, which use electronic data interchange (EDI) as a standard method of communication, are similarly marred. Those networks are based on a link-to-link messaging model that requires integration with multiple ERP applications. Same problem: One broken link, and the system comes to a halt. And perhaps more important, somewhere along the line, a small supplier might still be using spreadsheets and faxing documents, making it cumbersome to include the information in the electronic loop. In the traditional B2B model, there is no control because there is no collaboration, no synchronization of data among disparate systems, and limited visibility. In the B2B models now emerging, metrics and business processes are shared in a data hub that operates independently of the ERP or procurement systems of the participants. So, the definition of B2B has changed: B2B is no longer a supply chain; rather, it’s a partner network. “The foundation of this whole thing is the concept of a network and the idea that companies can share a transactional backbone to pass messages back and forth between each other and possibly share applications and workflow,” says John Fontanella, vice president of research at AMR Research. “And how that is delivered is really going to be up to the company.” Fontanella is referring to the managed service models emerging from traditional EDI value-added networks (VANs) that have typically functioned only as messaging services. Many VANs are morphing into shared e-business hubs that support a range of communication methods — e-mail, Web, EDI, XML, and even fax — to meet the different needs and capabilities of trading partners. These hubs will operate much like a business process outsourcing model, enabling partner companies to view information, regardless of who owns it. But there are different degrees of managed service emerging. According to AMR Research, at the most basic level, traditional EDI VAN vendors, such as GXS and Inovis, are building in the ability to translate transactions from any communication format. Other companies, such as Kinaxis, Sterling Commerce, i2, and E2open, take things a step further, adding a sophisticated application layer on top of the e-business data hub. Most of these vendors are also moving to a software-as-a-service (SaaS) framework that manages the process in a secure network and even measures performance. “When people think of B2B collaboration, they focus on system-to-system, which is transactionoriented,” says Randy Littleson, vice president of marketing at Kinaxis. “We still have that system-to-system [approach], but more importantly, Industries ma April 34 2008 Photo: Duncan Walker
Table of Contents Feed for the Digital Edition of Managing Automation - April 2008 Managing Automation - April 2008 Contents Take 1 Camstar to Introduce Software that Combines Quality, MES, and Intelligence SAP Revamps Maintenance, Raises Fees 29% New TAGSYS Chief Sees Opportunity in Broader Approach Siemens Turns to Security Weaver for Compliance Supply Chain Company Takes Next Step in U.S. Notes Cover Story: The Long Climb Special Report - Undertanding Enterprise Performance Management Caught Between Supply and Demand Taking Off the Blindfold No Room for Error Product Scan Advertiser Index Next Managing Automation - April 2008 Managing Automation - April 2008 - Managing Automation - April 2008 (Page Cover1) Managing Automation - April 2008 - Managing Automation - April 2008 (Page Cover2) Managing Automation - April 2008 - Contents (Page 3) Managing Automation - April 2008 - Contents (Page 4) Managing Automation - April 2008 - Contents (Page 5) Managing Automation - April 2008 - Take 1 (Page 6) Managing Automation - April 2008 - Take 1 (Page 7) Managing Automation - April 2008 - Camstar to Introduce Software that Combines Quality, MES, and Intelligence (Page 8) Managing Automation - April 2008 - SAP Revamps Maintenance, Raises Fees 29% (Page 9) Managing Automation - April 2008 - New TAGSYS Chief Sees Opportunity in Broader Approach (Page 10) Managing Automation - April 2008 - Siemens Turns to Security Weaver for Compliance (Page 11) Managing Automation - April 2008 - Siemens Turns to Security Weaver for Compliance (Page 12) Managing Automation - April 2008 - Supply Chain Company Takes Next Step in U.S. (Page 13) Managing Automation - April 2008 - Notes (Page 14) Managing Automation - April 2008 - Notes (Page 15) Managing Automation - April 2008 - Cover Story: The Long Climb (Page 16) Managing Automation - April 2008 - Cover Story: The Long Climb (Page 17) Managing Automation - April 2008 - Cover Story: The Long Climb (Page 18) Managing Automation - April 2008 - Cover Story: The Long Climb (Page 19) Managing Automation - April 2008 - Cover Story: The Long Climb (Page 20) Managing Automation - April 2008 - Cover Story: The Long Climb (Page 21) Managing Automation - April 2008 - Cover Story: The Long Climb (Page 22) Managing Automation - April 2008 - Cover Story: The Long Climb (Page 23) Managing Automation - April 2008 - Special Report - Undertanding Enterprise Performance Management (Page 24) Managing Automation - April 2008 - Special Report - Undertanding Enterprise Performance Management (Page 25) Managing Automation - April 2008 - Special Report - Undertanding Enterprise Performance Management (Page 26) Managing Automation - April 2008 - Special Report - Undertanding Enterprise Performance Management (Page 27) Managing Automation - April 2008 - Special Report - Undertanding Enterprise Performance Management (Page 28) Managing Automation - April 2008 - Special Report - Undertanding Enterprise Performance Management (Page 29) Managing Automation - April 2008 - Caught Between Supply and Demand (Page 30) Managing Automation - April 2008 - Caught Between Supply and Demand (Page 31) Managing Automation - April 2008 - Caught Between Supply and Demand (Page 32) Managing Automation - April 2008 - Caught Between Supply and Demand (Page 33) Managing Automation - April 2008 - Taking Off the Blindfold (Page 34) Managing Automation - April 2008 - Taking Off the Blindfold (Page 35) Managing Automation - April 2008 - Taking Off the Blindfold (Page 36) Managing Automation - April 2008 - No Room for Error (Page 37) Managing Automation - April 2008 - No Room for Error (Page 38) Managing Automation - April 2008 - No Room for Error (Page 39) Managing Automation - April 2008 - Product Scan (Page 40) Managing Automation - April 2008 - Product Scan (Page 41) Managing Automation - April 2008 - Product Scan (Page 42) Managing Automation - April 2008 - Product Scan (Page 43) Managing Automation - April 2008 - Advertiser Index (Page 44) Managing Automation - April 2008 - Advertiser Index (Page 45) Managing Automation - April 2008 - Next (Page 46) Managing Automation - April 2008 - Next (Page Cover3) Managing Automation - April 2008 - Next (Page Cover4)
For optimal viewing of this digital publication, please enable JavaScript and then refresh the page. If you would like to try to load the digital publication without using Flash Player detection, please click here.