Managing Automation - May 2008 - (Page 19)

Jackson: [Regarding] comfort level and associated risk, there are two routes that you can take. You can just stay within your comfort level, but that’s not being that innovative and you’re not moving things forward; you’re just simply doing the status quo. We recognize that there is inherent risk with being innovative in anything you do. But, in our view, being innovative and aligning ourselves with the corporate strategy, the ultimate result of that is what value is it going to bring to the customer and our company as well? Q: To what extent do any of you use a formalized planning approach for innovation projects — for example, a portfolio planning approach? Lambert: I think you almost have to take that type of approach, diversifying what trends and technology, what markets you want to invest in. You’ve got to be flexible enough to change those plans as the market changes. What we’ve found [is that] manufacturing in Canada has been drastically changing. Large OEMs that we’ve done business with over the last 20 years are closing their doors, sometimes without any warning. We’ve also found that when times are tough, customers that we had for the last 20, 25 years, customers’ loyalty based on historical relationships doesn’t go very far. So you have to be careful not to place all your investments in one customer and one market — to coin a phrase: diversified innovation, if you want to call it that. Q: What approaches and tools do you use to enable collaboration in innovation initiatives? Lambert: We migrated to 3D design for all of our hydraulic systems work in 2003 and that was around the same time that we started getting involved in this large St. Lawrence Seaway project. So tools like Autodesk Inventor, Vault, Productstream, Design Review, and Freewheel were, and continue to be, an integral part of our workflow. Without these tools, we simply wouldn’t be as innovative and effective in our business. We’ve been able to leverage that 3D technology, which we were forced to develop based on market demands, for our own engineering department down to the customer level. We’ve been improving our internal design reviews of new products as well as the customer approval process by leveraging digital prototyping. Jackson: Jim mentioned the rapid prototyping — we found that to be extremely effective, especially when you’re evaluating products — once they’ve gotten past the initial design phase and you want to see, is this going to work? Is my customer actually going to want this? A lot of times, it’s a touchy-feely kind of thing where they want to touch it, feel it, see what it looks like, and it gives us an opportunity to see how it’s going to function without all the costs of molds and high capital costs. Q: So you’re finding these tools helpful in communicating designs and changes not just internally, but also to customers and partners? Lambert: Oh, absolutely. From an internal standpoint, I can think back to several years ago when we would have a complicated project and we wanted to get everyone within production and manufacturing to buy into the idea of the design. This process could take several weeks. Using a digital prototype now, we can review the design in a matter of hours. The same goes for our outside customers, as well. Jackson: We can communicate with customers worldwide via quick e-mail [so that] within a day or two, we’ve gotten full approvals electronically and we make sure we keep track of that. Going forward internally, we’re going to a completely electronic system whereby even the production people out on the shop floor will have direct access to the most current revision level of any given product, be it a standard product or some customized product. Q: What will your companies focus on next in terms of pushing innovation? Lambert: We’re excited about a couple new technologies: One we’re developing here, internally — it’s a configuration tool for our salesmen We want to be able to give our salesmen tools whereby they could actually— through a configurator right in front of the customer — select certain criteria, application data, and then have it spit out automatically to them the 3D model, the drawings, quotation — everything. The second thing we’re really excited about — and we’re partnering with Autodesk on this — is Web-based, clientless design collaboration. In other words, for a customer in a remote area, we could upload the 3D model to a Web site and then we could collaborate on the Web live and record any changes, and it would be recorded like a meeting session online and available for download at any time. These are things that speed up the production process and allow us to provide innovative driving control solutions to customers more quickly than ever before. 19 May 2008

Table of Contents Feed for the Digital Edition of Managing Automation - May 2008

Managing Automation - May 2008 Contents Take 1 Award-Winning Shoe-Maker Otabo Alters Course, Shifts Production to China IBM Partners with Universities for Cloud Computing Getting Noise in Production Under Control Incuity Embarks on a Vertical Market Strategy Foundation Intensifies OPC Standard Testing Mailbox Notes PM Roundtable Cover Story: The Business of Going Green Special Report: Night and Day Delivering on Promises Finding the Right Fit for Wireless Driving RFID Product Scan Advertiser Index Next

Managing Automation - May 2008

For optimal viewing of this digital publication, please enable JavaScript and then refresh the page. If you would like to try to load the digital publication without using Flash Player detection, please click here.