Managing Automation - June 2008 - (Page 35) [ SPECIAL REPORT ] in a 3D model, which cuts lead times down by about eight weeks, he says. Training engineers to use the new system took a good year, and designs were gradually moved into the Windchill database. But the PTC PLM On Demand model gives this small manufacturer a big competitive advantage. “We can respond quicker, which gives us a competitive edge over other companies our size that are trying to do engineering work and just can’t handle the modeling,” Cannaverde says. “And when we deal with Fortune 500 companies and show them our database management system, they sometimes say it’s better than theirs. It shows them that we are serious about engineering.” THE SAFE PLAY For some mid-sized companies, however, security concerns — specifically the need to protect intellectual property — trump cost issues. That was the case at Callaway Golf, a maker of golf clubs, balls, and accessories, which opted for an on-premise PLM deployment after first considering the SaaS option. “Our concern ultimately boiled down to security,” says John Loo, Callaway’s senior manager of design systems. “The golf industry, in general, is very competitive so our big concern was that we might be exposed. Since we have the expertise to run it in-house, we decided to do that.” Callaway Golf designs its products in-house and outsources the component manufacturing to overseas contractors that send the product back to be built in the United States. But when the company launched a product development improvement initiative a few years ago, it quickly uncovered one glaring glitch in the value chain: communication — or a lack thereof — with suppliers. Callaway is constantly changing the design of its clubs, often introducing several new products annually. However, before PLM, alerting suppliers to a new design was as unsystematic as sending files via e-mail. “Many times we’d make changes, but it was buried in a supplier’s in-box,” Loo says. Of course, as a company known for its innovation in the golf industry, Callaway couldn’t afford to drop the ball at any point in its design-tomanufacturing process. The company has a long histor y with Siemens PLM Software (formerly UGS), using its CAD/CAM software to design areas of small radius and tightly blended curves — something not all CAD applications can do. But coordinating among design teams, engineers, suppliers, and even the marketing staff or lawyers was not an easy task. Recently, however, Callaway decided to automate its design collaboration processes using Siemens’ Web-based PLM portal, Teamcenter Community Collaboration, based on Micro soft’s Office SharePoint Ser ver. Teamcenter Community Collaboration is set up as a framework that streamlines workflow processes between dispersed teams. It also does content management. More important, it enables clear communication between Callaway and its partners. “The number-one thing our suppliers liked was the ability to be alerted when files were updated,” Loo says. There are other benefits as well, including a bidirectional desktop sharing function that allows multiple users to work PERVASIVE PLM together on a particular deskProduct lifecycle management is not just a set of top display, collaborating on a technologies; rather, it’s a strategic business CAD model, for example. “It alapproach. PLM applies a consistent set of business lows us to solve problems in an solutions in support of the collaborative creation, management, dissemination, and use of product hour that typically could take definition information across the extended entertwo to three days,” he says. prise from concept to end of life — integrating While this is a Web-based people, processes, business systems, and informatechnology, Callaway is using tion, according to research firm CIMdata Inc. an on-premise version of the Using this approach, companies can increase efficiency, reduce costs, improve quality, and launch software that it licensed from innovative products faster than ever. For that reaSiemens. Siemens has an SaaS son — and with many delivery options emerging version, which Callaway tried — PLM is becoming a critical business investment when it was testing the techfor manufacturers of all sizes. nology. But the company Projected PLM Market Growth quickly moved the software in(software and services) house, mainly because of se$38 billion $35.1 curity concerns. billion $32 $29 billion Suppliers connect to the $26 billion $24.3 billion Siemens internal design Web billion site via a secure VPN. Once they are in the network, Callaway controls all of the access and allows suppliers to see only the areas of a project on which 2007 2008* 2009* 2010* 2011* 2012* they are working. The portal is Source: CIMdata Inc. * Estimates accessible 24 hours a day, which eliminates any time zone barriers. On a typical business day, 200 different users will log on to the portal to access documents and collaborate, Loo says. So far, Teamcenter Community Collaboration has helped Callaway to disseminate design data. But Loo sees even more opportunity to integrate other applications into the portal, such as engineering product data management. “Now we have to manually move files to taking the pulse June 2008 35
Table of Contents Feed for the Digital Edition of Managing Automation - June 2008 Managing Automation - June 2008 Contents Take 1 SAP Cites Functionality, Cost Structure in Modified On-Demand Product Rollout Dassault Exec Predicts More PLM Consolidation The Blackberry Goes Native with SAP CRM QAD Brings MDM In-House with FullTilt Buy Power Experts Look to End Voltage Sags The Progressive Manufacturers Notes Cover Story: Playing the Globalization Game to Win Special Report Integration Transformation Industries Product Scan Advertiser Index Next Managing Automation - June 2008 Managing Automation - June 2008 - Managing Automation - June 2008 (Page Cover1) Managing Automation - June 2008 - Managing Automation - June 2008 (Page Cover2) Managing Automation - June 2008 - Contents (Page 3) Managing Automation - June 2008 - Contents (Page 4) Managing Automation - June 2008 - Contents (Page 5) Managing Automation - June 2008 - Take 1 (Page 6) Managing Automation - June 2008 - Take 1 (Page 7) Managing Automation - June 2008 - SAP Cites Functionality, Cost Structure in Modified On-Demand Product Rollout (Page 8) Managing Automation - June 2008 - Dassault Exec Predicts More PLM Consolidation (Page 9) Managing Automation - June 2008 - The Blackberry Goes Native with SAP CRM (Page 10) Managing Automation - June 2008 - The Blackberry Goes Native with SAP CRM (Page 11) Managing Automation - June 2008 - QAD Brings MDM In-House with FullTilt Buy (Page 12) Managing Automation - June 2008 - QAD Brings MDM In-House with FullTilt Buy (Page 13) Managing Automation - June 2008 - QAD Brings MDM In-House with FullTilt Buy (Page 14) Managing Automation - June 2008 - Power Experts Look to End Voltage Sags (Page 15) Managing Automation - June 2008 - The Progressive Manufacturers (Page 16) Managing Automation - June 2008 - The Progressive Manufacturers (Page 17) Managing Automation - June 2008 - Notes (Page 18) Managing Automation - June 2008 - Notes (Page 19) Managing Automation - June 2008 - Cover Story: Playing the Globalization Game to Win (Page 20) Managing Automation - June 2008 - Cover Story: Playing the Globalization Game to Win (Page 21) Managing Automation - June 2008 - Cover Story: Playing the Globalization Game to Win (Page 22) Managing Automation - June 2008 - Cover Story: Playing the Globalization Game to Win (Page 23) Managing Automation - June 2008 - Cover Story: Playing the Globalization Game to Win (Page 24) Managing Automation - June 2008 - Cover Story: Playing the Globalization Game to Win (Page 25) Managing Automation - June 2008 - Cover Story: Playing the Globalization Game to Win (Page 26) Managing Automation - June 2008 - Cover Story: Playing the Globalization Game to Win (Page 27) Managing Automation - June 2008 - Cover Story: Playing the Globalization Game to Win (Page 28) Managing Automation - June 2008 - Cover Story: Playing the Globalization Game to Win (Page 29) Managing Automation - June 2008 - Special Report (Page 30) Managing Automation - June 2008 - Special Report (Page 31) Managing Automation - June 2008 - Special Report (Page 32) Managing Automation - June 2008 - Special Report (Page 33) Managing Automation - June 2008 - Special Report (Page 34) Managing Automation - June 2008 - Special Report (Page 35) Managing Automation - June 2008 - Special Report (Page 36) Managing Automation - June 2008 - Special Report (Page 37) Managing Automation - June 2008 - Integration (Page 38) Managing Automation - June 2008 - Integration (Page 39) Managing Automation - June 2008 - Integration (Page 40) Managing Automation - June 2008 - Integration (Page 41) Managing Automation - June 2008 - Integration (Page 42) Managing Automation - June 2008 - Integration (Page 43) Managing Automation - June 2008 - Transformation (Page 44) Managing Automation - June 2008 - Transformation (Page 45) Managing Automation - June 2008 - Transformation (Page 46) Managing Automation - June 2008 - Transformation (Page 47) Managing Automation - June 2008 - Industries (Page 48) Managing Automation - June 2008 - Industries (Page 49) Managing Automation - June 2008 - Industries (Page 50) Managing Automation - June 2008 - Industries (Page 51) Managing Automation - June 2008 - Product Scan (Page 52) Managing Automation - June 2008 - Product Scan (Page 53) Managing Automation - June 2008 - Product Scan (Page 54) Managing Automation - June 2008 - Product Scan (Page 55) Managing Automation - June 2008 - Product Scan (Page 56) Managing Automation - June 2008 - Product Scan (Page 57) Managing Automation - June 2008 - Product Scan (Page 58) Managing Automation - June 2008 - Product Scan (Page 59) Managing Automation - June 2008 - Product Scan (Page 60) Managing Automation - June 2008 - Product Scan (Page 61) Managing Automation - June 2008 - Product Scan (Page 62) Managing Automation - June 2008 - Product Scan (Page 63) Managing Automation - June 2008 - Advertiser Index (Page 64) Managing Automation - June 2008 - Advertiser Index (Page 65) Managing Automation - June 2008 - Next (Page 66) Managing Automation - June 2008 - Next (Page Cover3) Managing Automation - June 2008 - Next (Page Cover4)
For optimal viewing of this digital publication, please enable JavaScript and then refresh the page. If you would like to try to load the digital publication without using Flash Player detection, please click here.