Managing Automation - August 2008 - (Page 32) H E AT H C A R E that mandate employer-provided coverage to take a hint from industry and do a better or require employer payments. job of using expensive equipment. According “Our members feel they’re best suited to to Pointe Precision’s Castine, several clinics pay for benefits and to assess how much have open recently in and around the comthey should be paying for their employee pany’s Plover, WI, headquarters, each sportbase,” says Jeri Gillespie, vice president of ing its own expensive CT scanning and other human resources policy at the National Asequipment, much of it underused. sociation of Manufacturers. “Until we see better cooperation among While manufacturers are at odds over healthcare providers, costs won’t come healthcare macro reforms, they see many down,” Castine says. smaller steps that the government can and And, manufacturers say, healthcare should be taking. Messinger, for example, providers should be required to do a better is among those calling for legislation to limit job of providing employers with complete inmalpractice lawsuit payouts. formation about the costs and outcomes reAccording to a recent report by the Mclated to their healthcare spending. Access to Kinsey Global Institute, doctors in the United States pay an average of The United States spends $477 billion $27,500 each per year on malprac- more on healthcare each year than peer tice insurance. That amounts to anEuropean countries, according to a nual spending of $20 billion. While that’s significant, it’s only a McKinsey Global Institute report. small part of the overspending on healthcare that takes place in the United that kind of information would allow manuStates. According to the McKinsey report, facturers and their employees to make better, the United States spends $477 billion more more informed decisions when selecting on healthcare each year than peer European healthcare and insurance providers, NAM’s countries. (That figure is adjusted for higher Gillespie says. per-capita income levels in the United States.) “Local hospitals and other providers need According to the report, the factors most acto promote transparency so that employers countable for higher U.S. healthcare costs know what they are getting for the price,” are doctors’ and nurses’ salaries; the cost of Gillespie says. “Right now, it’s pretty opaque, drugs, devices, and medical supplies; and the particularly if you’re a smaller manufacturer.” profits of private participants in the healthKEEPING COSTS IN CHECK care system. Manufacturers also suggest that the govBut many manufacturers aren’t waiting for ernment should require healthcare providers the government to begin bringing down the cost of providing healthcare. Some have begun to innovate on their own, pushing for consumer-driven healthcare and value-driven healthcare, two trends that may help keep costs in check. Textron Inc., a $13.2 billion aerospace manTOTAL EMPOLYEE/EMPLOYER HEALTHCARE ufacturer, has become a leader in consumerCOSTS 2003 VERSUS 2008 driven healthcare, an approach that places more responsibility on consumers for un2003 Total: $6,384 derstanding healthcare costs and taking steps Employee: $1,284 to reduce them. In 2002, responding to rapidly rising healthcare costs, Textron began inEmployer: $5,100 troducing health plans that featured personal care accounts (PCAs), funded by Textron, 2008 Total: 9,144 that employees manage and use to pay their Employee: healthcare costs. Employees can carry for$2,064 ward unused PCA funds for future medical Employer: $7,080 expenses or even retirement medical care. The plan also includes 100% coverage for Source: Towers Perrin preventive care services and financial pro- up going ma 32 2008 August
Table of Contents Feed for the Digital Edition of Managing Automation - August 2008 Managing Automation - August 2008 Contents Take 1 After 18 Months, the Oracle/SAP Suit Has Little Effect on Maintenance Sales At 100, Foxboro Reinvents Around Its Customers New Private Equity Firm Eyes Software A Software Suite Just for Manufacturers i2 Chief Focuses on Services Plan Notes It's Time for Action Examining U.S. Competitveness Leveling the Field An Unhealthy Situation Exploring Alternatives Math and Science: Key to the Future Product Scan Advertiser Index Next Managing Automation - August 2008 Managing Automation - August 2008 - Managing Automation - August 2008 (Page Cover1) Managing Automation - August 2008 - Managing Automation - August 2008 (Page Cover2) Managing Automation - August 2008 - Contents (Page 3) Managing Automation - August 2008 - Contents (Page 4) Managing Automation - August 2008 - Contents (Page 5) Managing Automation - August 2008 - Take 1 (Page 6) Managing Automation - August 2008 - Take 1 (Page 7) Managing Automation - August 2008 - After 18 Months, the Oracle/SAP Suit Has Little Effect on Maintenance Sales (Page 8) Managing Automation - August 2008 - At 100, Foxboro Reinvents Around Its Customers (Page 9) Managing Automation - August 2008 - New Private Equity Firm Eyes Software (Page 10) Managing Automation - August 2008 - A Software Suite Just for Manufacturers (Page 11) Managing Automation - August 2008 - i2 Chief Focuses on Services Plan (Page 12) Managing Automation - August 2008 - i2 Chief Focuses on Services Plan (Page 13) Managing Automation - August 2008 - Notes (Page 14) Managing Automation - August 2008 - Notes (Page 15) Managing Automation - August 2008 - It's Time for Action (Page 16) Managing Automation - August 2008 - It's Time for Action (Page 17) Managing Automation - August 2008 - It's Time for Action (Page 18) Managing Automation - August 2008 - It's Time for Action (Page 19) Managing Automation - August 2008 - It's Time for Action (Page 20) Managing Automation - August 2008 - It's Time for Action (Page 21) Managing Automation - August 2008 - Examining U.S. Competitveness (Page 22) Managing Automation - August 2008 - Examining U.S. Competitveness (Page 23) Managing Automation - August 2008 - Examining U.S. Competitveness (Page 24) Managing Automation - August 2008 - Examining U.S. Competitveness (Page 25) Managing Automation - August 2008 - Leveling the Field (Page 26) Managing Automation - August 2008 - Leveling the Field (Page 27) Managing Automation - August 2008 - Leveling the Field (Page 28) Managing Automation - August 2008 - Leveling the Field (Page 29) Managing Automation - August 2008 - An Unhealthy Situation (Page 30) Managing Automation - August 2008 - An Unhealthy Situation (Page 31) Managing Automation - August 2008 - An Unhealthy Situation (Page 32) Managing Automation - August 2008 - An Unhealthy Situation (Page 33) Managing Automation - August 2008 - Exploring Alternatives (Page 34) Managing Automation - August 2008 - Exploring Alternatives (Page 35) Managing Automation - August 2008 - Exploring Alternatives (Page 36) Managing Automation - August 2008 - Exploring Alternatives (Page 37) Managing Automation - August 2008 - Math and Science: Key to the Future (Page 38) Managing Automation - August 2008 - Math and Science: Key to the Future (Page 39) Managing Automation - August 2008 - Math and Science: Key to the Future (Page 40) Managing Automation - August 2008 - Math and Science: Key to the Future (Page 41) Managing Automation - August 2008 - Product Scan (Page 42) Managing Automation - August 2008 - Product Scan (Page 43) Managing Automation - August 2008 - Product Scan (Page 44) Managing Automation - August 2008 - Product Scan (Page 45) Managing Automation - August 2008 - Product Scan (Page 46) Managing Automation - August 2008 - Product Scan (Page 47) Managing Automation - August 2008 - Product Scan (Page 48) Managing Automation - August 2008 - Product Scan (Page 49) Managing Automation - August 2008 - Product Scan (Page 50) Managing Automation - August 2008 - Product Scan (Page 51) Managing Automation - August 2008 - Advertiser Index (Page 52) Managing Automation - August 2008 - Advertiser Index (Page 53) Managing Automation - August 2008 - Next (Page 54) Managing Automation - August 2008 - Next (Page Cover3) Managing Automation - August 2008 - Next (Page Cover4)
For optimal viewing of this digital publication, please enable JavaScript and then refresh the page. If you would like to try to load the digital publication without using Flash Player detection, please click here.