Managing Automation - October 2007 - (Page 32) [ COVER STORY ] Corp., and Dust Networks, Inc., are adding features to their wireless networking products that enhance reliability and data quality. To date, however, these features — like all wireless automation products themselves — are proprietary. Though industry standards that define how wireless products should guarantee reliability and data quality, among other things, are in the works, products that support those standards aren’t expected to be on the market for at least a year, vendors say. INTO OUTER SPACE Why are manufacturers worried about the reliability of wireless networks and the quality of the data they carr y? The most obvious concern is related to the fact that, with wireless, data is broadcast rather than contained on a wire. While that introduces security issues, it also raises reliability concerns. “With wireless, there is a distinct possibility that, rather than getting delivered, a message goes into outer space somewhere,” says Richard Caro, president of CMC Associates. But there are other, more specific concerns. Potential inter ference from other devices is one. Many wireless automation products toFACTORS INFLUENCING USE day, as well as the key OF WIRELESS wireless automation Manufacturers are looking for certain assurances before they will put wireless networks on the plant floor. standards now in development, are based on Wireless the IEEE 802.15.4 Reliability of security 23% data 28% technology, which typically uses radios operating in the 2.4-GHz band. However, other common Other 4% devices, such as other wireless networks, cordless phones, and even microwave ovens, also Single industry Need for single standard 18% use that band. network for many applications: 13% “We have found that Sensor battery life 14% the reliability of 802.15.4 Source: CMC Associates, ISA suffers in the presence of other wireless networks and devices,” says Dan Sexton, a project leader at GE Global Research, which, since 2004, has been evaluating wireless automation technologies under a contract from the U.S. Department of Energy. “Cordless phones, bad wiring, microwave ovens can jam the spectrum. That’s a big problem.” Some manufacturers also worry about interference from the wireless network itself. According to the ISA/CMC survey, manufacturers say they initially expect to deploy, on check list average, four sensors and other devices per 10 square meters using wireless technology. Eventually, they say, device density could be expected to rise to 10 to 15 devices per 10 square meters. Manufacturers worry that, as wireless device density increases, devices may begin to interfere with one another, CMC’s Caro says. And some manufacturers also worry about threats from terrorism and other conscious attempts to interrupt plant operations by targeting wireless networks. “It’s a very valid concern,” Caro says. “We don’t have any data that says a jamming device couldn’t bring down the whole network.” With all those potential problems, it’s no wonder that many manufacturers are holding off on widespread wireless deployments, at least until they can get more experience with the technology. “Data integrity and reliability in wireless environments is a huge issue for us,” says Ronald T. Morris, a senior engineering associate at DuPont Chemical Solutions, which, so far, has put in place isolated wireless networks, mostly for device and environmental monitoring. “It’s something that is going to take time and experience to deal with.” Wireless technology vendors are attempting to streamline that process by building features into their products that reinforce the reliability of wireless networking and help users track and validate data quality. Several vendors, including Dust, Emerson, and Invensys, have built their wireless automation products around the same type of mesh networking topology that is part of the 802.15.4 IEEE technology. Rather than routing all communications through a single gateway, mesh networks enable messages to reach a node or device via multiple paths. While that approach can carry a performance hit, it also means improved reliability and data integrity because, if one channel goes down or experiences interference, the network can recover on its own. And vendors are augmenting mesh wireless network reliability. Dust, which developed the time-synchronized mesh protocol used by many wireless automation vendors, has added to its products tools that let users continuously view the topology and performance of all elements of the wireless network in real time. On top of that, says Dust Marketing Vice President Steve Toteda, some resellers of Dust’s products — including General Electric, which sells a version of Dust’s wireless technology to pharmaceutical companies — have added a feature that automatically adds a software wrapper to each message moving through the network to let a network administrator confirm ma October 32 2007
Table of Contents Feed for the Digital Edition of Managing Automation - October 2007 Contents Take 1 Mailbox New Selling and Fulfillment Product Leads Plan to Transform Sterling Commerce Comtrol Closes Bizarre Chapter Involving Founder New Omron COO Outlines Four-Part Growth Agenda New Mfg. ‘Czar’ Will Have a Full Plate of Issues Lawson Embraces The Trend of Fewer Upgrades Notes Wanted: A Unified Infrastructure Needed: Greater Reliability Special Report: Innovation: Why Are So Many Coming Up Short? Transforamation: Beating the Odds in Global Supply Industries: Metals: Tracking Carbon Footprints Product Scan Advertiser Index Next Managing Automation - October 2007 Managing Automation - October 2007 - (Page 1) Managing Automation - October 2007 - (Page 2) Managing Automation - October 2007 - (Page 3) Managing Automation - October 2007 - Contents (Page 4) Managing Automation - October 2007 - Contents (Page 5) Managing Automation - October 2007 - Contents (Page 6) Managing Automation - October 2007 - Contents (Page 7) Managing Automation - October 2007 - Take 1 (Page 8) Managing Automation - October 2007 - Take 1 (Page 9) Managing Automation - October 2007 - Mailbox (Page 10) Managing Automation - October 2007 - Mailbox (Page 11) Managing Automation - October 2007 - New Selling and Fulfillment Product Leads Plan to Transform Sterling Commerce (Page 12) Managing Automation - October 2007 - Comtrol Closes Bizarre Chapter Involving Founder (Page 13) Managing Automation - October 2007 - New Omron COO Outlines Four-Part Growth Agenda (Page 14) Managing Automation - October 2007 - New Omron COO Outlines Four-Part Growth Agenda (Page 15) Managing Automation - October 2007 - New Omron COO Outlines Four-Part Growth Agenda (Page 16) Managing Automation - October 2007 - New Mfg. ‘Czar’ Will Have a Full Plate of Issues (Page 17) Managing Automation - October 2007 - Lawson Embraces The Trend of Fewer Upgrades (Page 18) Managing Automation - October 2007 - Lawson Embraces The Trend of Fewer Upgrades (Page 19) Managing Automation - October 2007 - Notes (Page 20) Managing Automation - October 2007 - Notes (Page 21) Managing Automation - October 2007 - Wanted: A Unified Infrastructure (Page 22) Managing Automation - October 2007 - Wanted: A Unified Infrastructure (Page 23) Managing Automation - October 2007 - Wanted: A Unified Infrastructure (Page 24) Managing Automation - October 2007 - Wanted: A Unified Infrastructure (Page 25) Managing Automation - October 2007 - Wanted: A Unified Infrastructure (Page 26) Managing Automation - October 2007 - Wanted: A Unified Infrastructure (Page 27) Managing Automation - October 2007 - Wanted: A Unified Infrastructure (Page 28) Managing Automation - October 2007 - Wanted: A Unified Infrastructure (Page 29) Managing Automation - October 2007 - Needed: Greater Reliability (Page 30) Managing Automation - October 2007 - Needed: Greater Reliability (Page 31) Managing Automation - October 2007 - Needed: Greater Reliability (Page 32) Managing Automation - October 2007 - Needed: Greater Reliability (Page 33) Managing Automation - October 2007 - Needed: Greater Reliability (Page 34) Managing Automation - October 2007 - Needed: Greater Reliability (Page 35) Managing Automation - October 2007 - Special Report: Innovation: Why Are So Many Coming Up Short? (Page 36) Managing Automation - October 2007 - Special Report: Innovation: Why Are So Many Coming Up Short? (Page 37) Managing Automation - October 2007 - Special Report: Innovation: Why Are So Many Coming Up Short? (Page 38) Managing Automation - October 2007 - Special Report: Innovation: Why Are So Many Coming Up Short? (Page 39) Managing Automation - October 2007 - Transforamation: Beating the Odds in Global Supply (Page 40) Managing Automation - October 2007 - Transforamation: Beating the Odds in Global Supply (Page 41) Managing Automation - October 2007 - Transforamation: Beating the Odds in Global Supply (Page 42) Managing Automation - October 2007 - Transforamation: Beating the Odds in Global Supply (Page 43) Managing Automation - October 2007 - Industries: Metals: Tracking Carbon Footprints (Page 44) Managing Automation - October 2007 - Industries: Metals: Tracking Carbon Footprints (Page 45) Managing Automation - October 2007 - Industries: Metals: Tracking Carbon Footprints (Page 46) Managing Automation - October 2007 - Industries: Metals: Tracking Carbon Footprints (Page 47) Managing Automation - October 2007 - Product Scan (Page 48) Managing Automation - October 2007 - Product Scan (Page 49) Managing Automation - October 2007 - Product Scan (Page 50) Managing Automation - October 2007 - Product Scan (Page 51) Managing Automation - October 2007 - Advertiser Index (Page 52) Managing Automation - October 2007 - Advertiser Index (Page 53) Managing Automation - October 2007 - Next (Page 54) Managing Automation - October 2007 - Next (Page 55) Managing Automation - October 2007 - Next (Page 56)
For optimal viewing of this digital publication, please enable JavaScript and then refresh the page. If you would like to try to load the digital publication without using Flash Player detection, please click here.