Managing Automation - December 2008 - (Page 41) you make — even if it is just a component for a device — and understand how it works and its potential failures so that you can build a manufacturing process that consistently gives you good parts that don’t fail in a critical way and harm a patient,” Moll’s Jobson says. To that end, Moll, which works with about a dozen medical device OEMs, created a quality planning process that doesn’t just take a customer’s information at face value, but applies a risk analysis that looks at design for manufacturability. “The solution is all about identification, measurement, and mitigation of risk.” — Dyadem’s North “If it comes down to having a product with a design that could yield a defect, we go back to the customer and make suggestions and proposals that may eliminate it,” Jobson says. Dyadem’s risk assessment software, together with its Stature QLM hub, helps close the loop with product design, build, and delivery, whereby information on failures, effects, and causes can be transferred back to the design process to influence product specifications. “At the end of the day, the solution is all about identification, measurement, and mitigation of risk,” says Kevin North, Dyadem’s president and CEO. That means looking at a product from the component level, identifying what could potentially fail, measuring the impact of the potential failures, and ultimately instigating changes in design or manufacturing processes to pre-empt a problem, he says. While vendors such as Dyadem, CIMTEK, Sparta Systems Inc., and MetricStream Inc. offer products geared toward quality workflow, there is still no substitute for the statistical analysis and detailed data tracking for regulatory compliance that DataNet Quality Systems, IBM, and others offer. QUALITY COSTS The medical device industry has been influenced more by regulatory mandates than by efficiency gains. “They are getting killed on the cost of compliance, so [QM] is the low-hanging fruit for them,” DataNet’s Arnett says. The DataNet WinSPC software performs statistical analysis on production processes to detect and correct non-conformances. The goal is data integrity. “If you look at traceability or design changes that impact production, you want to know every bit of context so that when you look at the needle in the haystack, you are looking at the smallest haystack possible,” Arnett says. To that end, WinSPC groups statistical methods into classifications defined by variables that will have bearing on the outcome. “You don’t want to collect 100 variables that are not relevant to the decision you are trying to make,” Arnett says. In this case, you are not measuring output efficiency, but variables related to quality. Similarly, IBM’s Telelogic DOORS software offers product requirements management via traceability from conception to implementation. Since documentation is a critical requirement in the medical manufacturing world, each team — engineering, manufacturing, and quality — is responsible for describing the steps in the process. Correlating that cross-functional information is difficult to do without a change management repositor y that captures the relationships among the systems, which is what DOORS does. “The business driver here is it helps you demonstrate back to auditors that you did what you said you were going to do and that you can validate that,” says Kathi Lafser, senior application engineer at IBM. Prior to joining Telelogic, which IBM acquired earlier this year, Lafser worked as a quality manager at a U.S.-based pharmaceutical company. “We always said, ‘If it’s not documented and not demonstrated, then you didn’t do it,’ ” she says. “Having an audit trail is key in a regulated environment, and DOORS captures all changes.” Indeed, the ability to show compliance, as Moll’s Jobson had to do a year ago during the recall, is managingautomation.com a critical measure of success. The ultimate RELATED ARTICLES: Managing Outsourcing: Ensuring Quality Across goal, however, is to Oceans catch potential failures www.managingautomation.com/managingoutsourcing before they happen. Giving Up the Paper Chase Today, Jobson says, www.managingautomation.com/paperchase Moll is fairly close to PLM’s Vertical Challenge guaranteeing that what www.managingautomation.com/plmchallenge it pushes out of its own Quality Lifecycle Management Goes Enterprise manufacturing faciliwww.managingautomation.com/qlm ties would not be a contributing factor if COMPANIES MENTIONED: there were to be a CIMTEK www.managingautomation.com/cimtek product recall. “We can design a DataNet Quality Systems www.managingautomation.com/datanet process that gives you zero defects on any Dyadem International www.managingautomation.com/dyadem critical quality attributes,” Jobson says. IBM www.managingautomation.com/ibm That’s quality control at its best. ■ maonline Photo courtesy: Dyadem 41 December 2008 http://www.managingautomation.com http://www.managingautomation.com/managingoutsourcing http://www.managingautomation.com/paperchase http://www.managingautomation.com/plmchallenge http://www.managingautomation.com/qlm http://www.managingautomation.com/cimtek http://www.managingautomation.com/datanet http://www.managingautomation.com/dyadem http://www.managingautomation.com/ibm
Table of Contents Feed for the Digital Edition of Managing Automation - December 2008 Managing Automation - December 2008 Contents Take 1 Business Objects Chief Says Union with SAP Meets Objectives After One Year Yes, Emerson, Too, Is in the MES Market Infor Chief Puts Off IPO, Restarts Buying Plans Kronos Now Tracks Shop Floor Machines IQMS Rolls Out User Interace, Other Upgrades Notes Five Ideas for Demand Planning Building on the SOA Blueprint Innovation Now A Team Effort Lean %2B Technology = LEAN^2 Finding Flaws Before They Spread Product Scan Advertiser Index Next Managing Automation - December 2008 Managing Automation - December 2008 - Managing Automation - December 2008 (Page Cover1) Managing Automation - December 2008 - Managing Automation - December 2008 (Page Cover2) Managing Automation - December 2008 - Managing Automation - December 2008 (Page 3) Managing Automation - December 2008 - Contents (Page 4) Managing Automation - December 2008 - Contents (Page 5) Managing Automation - December 2008 - Contents (Page 6) Managing Automation - December 2008 - Contents (Page 7) Managing Automation - December 2008 - Take 1 (Page 8) Managing Automation - December 2008 - Take 1 (Page 9) Managing Automation - December 2008 - Business Objects Chief Says Union with SAP Meets Objectives After One Year (Page 10) Managing Automation - December 2008 - Yes, Emerson, Too, Is in the MES Market (Page 11) Managing Automation - December 2008 - Infor Chief Puts Off IPO, Restarts Buying Plans (Page 12) Managing Automation - December 2008 - Kronos Now Tracks Shop Floor Machines (Page 13) Managing Automation - December 2008 - Kronos Now Tracks Shop Floor Machines (Page 14) Managing Automation - December 2008 - IQMS Rolls Out User Interace, Other Upgrades (Page 15) Managing Automation - December 2008 - Notes (Page 16) Managing Automation - December 2008 - Notes (Page 17) Managing Automation - December 2008 - Five Ideas for Demand Planning (Page 18) Managing Automation - December 2008 - Five Ideas for Demand Planning (Page 19) Managing Automation - December 2008 - Five Ideas for Demand Planning (Page 20) Managing Automation - December 2008 - Five Ideas for Demand Planning (Page 21) Managing Automation - December 2008 - Five Ideas for Demand Planning (Page 22) Managing Automation - December 2008 - Five Ideas for Demand Planning (Page 23) Managing Automation - December 2008 - Five Ideas for Demand Planning (Page 24) Managing Automation - December 2008 - Five Ideas for Demand Planning (Page 25) Managing Automation - December 2008 - Building on the SOA Blueprint (Page 26) Managing Automation - December 2008 - Building on the SOA Blueprint (Page 27) Managing Automation - December 2008 - Building on the SOA Blueprint (Page 28) Managing Automation - December 2008 - Building on the SOA Blueprint (Page 29) Managing Automation - December 2008 - Building on the SOA Blueprint (Page 30) Managing Automation - December 2008 - Building on the SOA Blueprint (Page 31) Managing Automation - December 2008 - Innovation Now A Team Effort (Page 32) Managing Automation - December 2008 - Innovation Now A Team Effort (Page 33) Managing Automation - December 2008 - Innovation Now A Team Effort (Page 34) Managing Automation - December 2008 - Innovation Now A Team Effort (Page 35) Managing Automation - December 2008 - Lean %2B Technology = LEAN^2 (Page 36) Managing Automation - December 2008 - Lean %2B Technology = LEAN^2 (Page 37) Managing Automation - December 2008 - Lean %2B Technology = LEAN^2 (Page 38) Managing Automation - December 2008 - Finding Flaws Before They Spread (Page 39) Managing Automation - December 2008 - Finding Flaws Before They Spread (Page 40) Managing Automation - December 2008 - Finding Flaws Before They Spread (Page 41) Managing Automation - December 2008 - Finding Flaws Before They Spread (Page 42) Managing Automation - December 2008 - Finding Flaws Before They Spread (Page 43) Managing Automation - December 2008 - Product Scan (Page 44) Managing Automation - December 2008 - Product Scan (Page 45) Managing Automation - December 2008 - Product Scan (Page 46) Managing Automation - December 2008 - Product Scan (Page 47) Managing Automation - December 2008 - Product Scan (Page 48) Managing Automation - December 2008 - Product Scan (Page 49) Managing Automation - December 2008 - Product Scan (Page 50) Managing Automation - December 2008 - Product Scan (Page 51) Managing Automation - December 2008 - Product Scan (Page 52) Managing Automation - December 2008 - Advertiser Index (Page 53) Managing Automation - December 2008 - Next (Page 54) Managing Automation - December 2008 - Next (Page Cover3) Managing Automation - December 2008 - Next (Page Cover4)
For optimal viewing of this digital publication, please enable JavaScript and then refresh the page. If you would like to try to load the digital publication without using Flash Player detection, please click here.