Food Protection Trends - July 2008 - (Page 471) FIGURE 4. Detection limit of the luminescent Phast Swab assay. An initial inoculum of 101 CFU/100 cm2 gave detectable results. × steps were conducted at 31oC, and following the assay, the Phast Swab was read by use of a SystemSure II handheld luminometer (Hygiena, Camarillo, CA). Evaluation of the Phast Swab E. coli O157:H7 strain 27 (a bovine isolate from our strain collection housed in the Dept. of Animal Sciences at CSU) was used to evaluate the use of the Phast Swab on meat samples (simulated carcass tissue). Stock bacterial cultures were maintained in 30% glycerol and were frozen at -70oC. An overnight culture of E. coli O157:H7 strain 27 was diluted by preparing a series of 10-1 dilutions in lambda buffer until the final dilution was 10 -9. To simulate carcass tissue, ten centimeter by ten centimeter portions of beef (top round, sirloin tip) were inoculated with the serial dilutions of E. coli O157:H7 by pipetting 1 ml of each dilution on an individual 10 × 10 cm (100 cm2) piece of meat and by spreading the dilution over the entire surface of the meat with a glass hockey stick. The concentration of each dilution was determined by plate count. The meat was allowed to dry for one hour, and then the entire surface of each meat sample was swabbed with an individual Phast Swab. The rest of the assay was performed as already described. Two negative controls were included in the assay. The controls consisted of a cell-only control (C1, Fig. 3), which entailed swabbing a meat sample inoculated with E. coli O157:H7 (109 CFU/ml) and completing the assay as already described, except that no reporter phage was added, and a phage-only control (C2, Fig. 3), which entailed swabbing an un-inoculated piece of meat (i.e., meat not previously inoculated with E. coli O157:H7) and completing the assay as already described. Luminescent detection For luminescent detection, the Phast Swab was conducted as described, except that a cell-only control was included for each dilution tested. A phage-only control was also included. Each Phast Swab was read three times, and the readings were subtracted from the mean reading of the cell-only or phage-only control (whichever had the higher RLU reading). Group means for the luminescent readings from each dilution were calculated. For each sample tested, a Student’s t-test was performed, using a Φ value of 0.05. A test result was considered positive if it was 3 standard deviations greater than the corresponding group mean. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION The results of the colorimetric Phast Swab assay are shown in Fig. 3. The visual detection limit was obtained by comparing the test samples to the control samples (C1 and C2). Any sample in which a color change was observed (compared to the controls) was considered a positive test result. With an eight-hour enrichment, the detection limit was an original inoculum of 103 CFU/100 cm2. The results of the colorimetric assay show that the Phast Swab is sensitive, easy to use, and fairly rapid. Further investigation has shown that placing the Phast Swabs in the refrigerator overnight increases the intensity of the color reaction, which helps in situations in which the color reaction is weak. To increase the sensitivity of the assay, we investigated the use of β-galactosidase luminescent substrates. The luminescent substrates display the highest sensitivity and largest dynamic range of any class of β-galactosidase substrate, and these substrates allow the luminescent assay of β-galactosidase to become as sensitive as the assay of bioluminescent luciferase (12). The luminescent assay was based on the use of a coupled luminescent reaction. Coupled assays have been designed using modified forms of luciferin that require the action of a second enzyme to yield luminescence. In this study, a luciferin-galactoside substrate (6-Oβ-galactopyranosylluciferin) (Promega, Madison, WI) produced a detectable signal via a coupled enzyme reaction in which the substrate was first cleaved by β-galactosidase to form luciferin and galactose. The luciferin was then utilized in a firefly luciferase reaction to generate light, which was read by use of a handheld luminometer. When the luminescent substrate was used, the initial 102 CFU/100 cm2 inoculum was easily detectable (T(2) = 297.29, Φ < 0.005), as was the initial 101 CFU/100 cm 2 inoculum (T(2) = 5.586, Φ = 0.031) (Fig. 4). The increased sensitivity of the luminescent substrates indicated that the use of a luminescent substrate should increase the speed of the Phast Swab assay, since a shorter enrichment time would be needed for a positive result. In this study, the use of the luminescent substrate led to detection of E. coli O157:H7 on the beef samples within 10 hours, as opposed to 12 hours with use of the colorimetric substrate, and the limit of detection was 100 fold higher. In previous experiments, the Phast Swab has been tested against other members of the Enterobacteriaceae, including various isolates and strains of non O157:H7 E. coli, Salmonella spp., JULY 2008 | FOOD PROTECTION TRENDS 471
Table of Contents Feed for the Digital Edition of Food Protection Trends - July 2008 Food Protection Trends - July 2008 Contents Sustaining Members Lone Star Perspective from Your President Commentary from the Executive Director An Integrated Assay for Rapid Detection of Escherichia coli O157:H7 on Beef Samples Listeria Prevention Practices for Small Cheese Operations New Members News Industry Products Award Winners Committee Meetings Ivan Parkin Lecture John H. Silliker Lecture Preliminary Program Networking Opportunities General Information Registration Form Workshops Exhibitors Special Contributors and Sponsors Coming Events Advertising Index Journal of Food Protection Table of Contents Audiovisual Library Order Form Booklet Order Form Membership Application Food Protection Trends - July 2008 Food Protection Trends - July 2008 - Food Protection Trends - July 2008 (Page Cover1) Food Protection Trends - July 2008 - Food Protection Trends - July 2008 (Page Cover2) Food Protection Trends - July 2008 - Food Protection Trends - July 2008 (Page 453) Food Protection Trends - July 2008 - Contents (Page 454) Food Protection Trends - July 2008 - Contents (Page 455) Food Protection Trends - July 2008 - Contents (Page 456) Food Protection Trends - July 2008 - Contents (Page 457) Food Protection Trends - July 2008 - Contents (Page 458) Food Protection Trends - July 2008 - Contents (Page 459) Food Protection Trends - July 2008 - Contents (Page 460) Food Protection Trends - July 2008 - Sustaining Members (Page 461) Food Protection Trends - July 2008 - Sustaining Members (Page 462) Food Protection Trends - July 2008 - Sustaining Members (Page 463) Food Protection Trends - July 2008 - Lone Star Perspective from Your President (Page 464) Food Protection Trends - July 2008 - Lone Star Perspective from Your President (Page 465) Food Protection Trends - July 2008 - Commentary from the Executive Director (Page 466) Food Protection Trends - July 2008 - Commentary from the Executive Director (Page 467) Food Protection Trends - July 2008 - An Integrated Assay for Rapid Detection of Escherichia coli O157:H7 on Beef Samples (Page 468) Food Protection Trends - July 2008 - An Integrated Assay for Rapid Detection of Escherichia coli O157:H7 on Beef Samples (Page 469) Food Protection Trends - July 2008 - An Integrated Assay for Rapid Detection of Escherichia coli O157:H7 on Beef Samples (Page 470) Food Protection Trends - July 2008 - An Integrated Assay for Rapid Detection of Escherichia coli O157:H7 on Beef Samples (Page 471) Food Protection Trends - July 2008 - An Integrated Assay for Rapid Detection of Escherichia coli O157:H7 on Beef Samples (Page 472) Food Protection Trends - July 2008 - Listeria Prevention Practices for Small Cheese Operations (Page 473) Food Protection Trends - July 2008 - Listeria Prevention Practices for Small Cheese Operations (Page 474) Food Protection Trends - July 2008 - Listeria Prevention Practices for Small Cheese Operations (Page 475) Food Protection Trends - July 2008 - Listeria Prevention Practices for Small Cheese Operations (Page 476) Food Protection Trends - July 2008 - Listeria Prevention Practices for Small Cheese Operations (Page 477) Food Protection Trends - July 2008 - Listeria Prevention Practices for Small Cheese Operations (Page 478) Food Protection Trends - July 2008 - Listeria Prevention Practices for Small Cheese Operations (Page 479) Food Protection Trends - July 2008 - Listeria Prevention Practices for Small Cheese Operations (Page 480) Food Protection Trends - July 2008 - Listeria Prevention Practices for Small Cheese Operations (Page 481) Food Protection Trends - July 2008 - Listeria Prevention Practices for Small Cheese Operations (Page 482) Food Protection Trends - July 2008 - Listeria Prevention Practices for Small Cheese Operations (Page 483) Food Protection Trends - July 2008 - New Members (Page 484) Food Protection Trends - July 2008 - New Members (Page 485) Food Protection Trends - July 2008 - New Members (Page 486) Food Protection Trends - July 2008 - News (Page 487) Food Protection Trends - July 2008 - News (Page 488) Food Protection Trends - July 2008 - News (Page 489) Food Protection Trends - July 2008 - News (Page 490) Food Protection Trends - July 2008 - Industry Products (Page 491) Food Protection Trends - July 2008 - Industry Products (Page 492) Food Protection Trends - July 2008 - Industry Products (Page 493) Food Protection Trends - July 2008 - Industry Products (Page 494) Food Protection Trends - July 2008 - Industry Products (Page 495) Food Protection Trends - July 2008 - Industry Products (Page 496) Food Protection Trends - July 2008 - Industry Products (Page 497) Food Protection Trends - July 2008 - Industry Products (Page 498) Food Protection Trends - July 2008 - Industry Products (Page 499) Food Protection Trends - July 2008 - Award Winners (Page 500) Food Protection Trends - July 2008 - Committee Meetings (Page 501) Food Protection Trends - July 2008 - Ivan Parkin Lecture (Page 502) Food Protection Trends - July 2008 - John H. Silliker Lecture (Page 503) Food Protection Trends - July 2008 - Preliminary Program (Page 504) Food Protection Trends - July 2008 - Preliminary Program (Page 505) Food Protection Trends - July 2008 - Preliminary Program (Page 506) Food Protection Trends - July 2008 - Preliminary Program (Page 507) Food Protection Trends - July 2008 - Preliminary Program (Page 508) Food Protection Trends - July 2008 - Preliminary Program (Page 509) Food Protection Trends - July 2008 - Preliminary Program (Page 510) Food Protection Trends - July 2008 - Preliminary Program (Page 511) Food Protection Trends - July 2008 - Preliminary Program (Page 512) Food Protection Trends - July 2008 - Preliminary Program (Page 513) Food Protection Trends - July 2008 - Preliminary Program (Page 514) Food Protection Trends - July 2008 - Preliminary Program (Page 515) Food Protection Trends - July 2008 - Preliminary Program (Page 516) Food Protection Trends - July 2008 - Preliminary Program (Page 517) Food Protection Trends - July 2008 - Preliminary Program (Page 518) Food Protection Trends - July 2008 - Preliminary Program (Page 519) Food Protection Trends - July 2008 - Preliminary Program (Page 520) Food Protection Trends - July 2008 - Preliminary Program (Page 521) Food Protection Trends - July 2008 - Preliminary Program (Page 522) Food Protection Trends - July 2008 - Preliminary Program (Page 523) Food Protection Trends - July 2008 - Preliminary Program (Page 524) Food Protection Trends - July 2008 - Preliminary Program (Page 525) Food Protection Trends - July 2008 - Preliminary Program (Page 526) Food Protection Trends - July 2008 - Preliminary Program (Page 527) Food Protection Trends - July 2008 - Preliminary Program (Page 528) Food Protection Trends - July 2008 - Preliminary Program (Page 529) Food Protection Trends - July 2008 - Preliminary Program (Page 530) Food Protection Trends - July 2008 - Preliminary Program (Page 531) Food Protection Trends - July 2008 - Preliminary Program (Page 532) Food Protection Trends - July 2008 - Preliminary Program (Page 533) Food Protection Trends - July 2008 - Preliminary Program (Page 534) Food Protection Trends - July 2008 - Networking Opportunities (Page 535) Food Protection Trends - July 2008 - General Information (Page 536) Food Protection Trends - July 2008 - Registration Form (Page 537) Food Protection Trends - July 2008 - Workshops (Page 538) Food Protection Trends - July 2008 - Workshops (Page 539) Food Protection Trends - July 2008 - Exhibitors (Page 540) Food Protection Trends - July 2008 - Exhibitors (Page 541) Food Protection Trends - July 2008 - Exhibitors (Page 542) Food Protection Trends - July 2008 - Exhibitors (Page 543) Food Protection Trends - July 2008 - Special Contributors and Sponsors (Page 544) Food Protection Trends - July 2008 - Special Contributors and Sponsors (Page 545) Food Protection Trends - July 2008 - Coming Events (Page 546) Food Protection Trends - July 2008 - Advertising Index (Page 547) Food Protection Trends - July 2008 - Journal of Food Protection Table of Contents (Page 548) Food Protection Trends - July 2008 - Journal of Food Protection Table of Contents (Page 549) Food Protection Trends - July 2008 - Audiovisual Library Order Form (Page 550) Food Protection Trends - July 2008 - Booklet Order Form (Page 551) Food Protection Trends - July 2008 - Membership Application (Page 552) Food Protection Trends - July 2008 - Membership Application (Page Cover3) Food Protection Trends - July 2008 - Membership Application (Page Cover4)
For optimal viewing of this digital publication, please enable JavaScript and then refresh the page. If you would like to try to load the digital publication without using Flash Player detection, please click here.