Food Protection Trends - September 2008 - (Page 653) TABLE 1. Prevalence and concentration of S. aureus on chilled beef (3) and sheep (4) carcasses, in frozen boneless beef (3) and sheep meats (4), and on chilled ground beef and diced lamb for retail sale (5) Beef Carcass Prevalence (%) Mean log10 CFU/cm2 or/g Standard deviation 90th percentile 95th percentile Maximum a Sheep Ground 28.1b 2.18 0.95 3.74 4.23 4.63 Carcass 23.4c 0.93 0.65 1.85 2.14 2.63 Boneless 32.7b 1.14 0.65 2.16 2.51 3.38 Diced 22.5b 2.34 0.86 3.63 4.02 4.48 Boneless 20.3b 0.80 0.32 1.00 1.74 2.32 28.7a 0.34 0.70 1.36 1.56 2.96 Limit of detection 0.08 CFU/cm2 Limit of detection 10 CFU/g b c Limit of detection 0.33 CFU/cm2 reports on the findings of the former investigation in abattoirs and boning rooms. water were used to sample each site of the selected carcass, a composite sample being taken by sponging a 100 cm2 area at each of the butt, flank and brisket regions of beef, and a 25 cm2 area at each of the midloin, flank and brisket of sheep, as detailed in the Mega Reg method (2). The third national baseline study of carcasses and boneless meat (3, 4) confirmed S. aureus on 15 and 20% of chilled sheep and beef carcasses, respectively, with concentration exceeding 2 log units CFU/ cm2 on some carcasses. On boneless beef and sheep meat, its prevalence was 2% and 16%, respectively, with mean concentration 1.5 log units CFU/g and 1.7 log units CFU/g, respectively. The first national retail study of red meat (5) similarly found high prevalence of S. aureus on ground beef and diced lamb samples. Although limits of detection differ, when the prevalence and concentration of S. aureus on carcasses, boneless meat and retail meat were compared (Table 1), significant (1–2 log units) increases in retail products became an issue that the industry considered should be investigated. The fact that S. aureus is perceived as a poor competitor against the spoilage microflora, coupled with its inability to multiply significantly at temperatures colder than 10°C (8), pointed toward either temperature abuse and/or excessive contact with the hands of food operators in the dressing-boning-retail continuum as causes of increased levels at retail. Accordingly, separate investigations were begun to locate sources of contamination with S. aureus at the abattoir/boning room and at the retail level. The present paper MATERIALS AND METHODS Design of the study Examination of data gathered in the third baseline study indicated that some processing operations produced meat with low prevalence and concentration of S. aureus while the reverse was obtained at others. Accordingly, an investigation was undertaken between October and November, 2006 at five abattoirs. At each, observations were made of how operators handled carcasses and meat cuts and samples were taken for microbiological analysis. Sampling of freshly exposed areas of sheep carcasses Using a Whirlpak sponge moistened as described above, a technician sponged each side of the freshly exposed carcass from immediately below the hindquarters to the brisket, using one side of the sponge for each half of the carcass. It was estimated that a total area of 3000 cm2 was sampled. Similarly, the entire hindquarters were sponged with one sponge to a level just below the tail; it was estimated that a total area of 1500 cm2 was sampled. Sampling of beef and sheep carcasses Selection of carcasses and subsequent sampling was performed by a team of trained technicians. Individual carcasses were selected for sampling by use of a systematic-random approach. Briefly, of the total lot of carcasses accessible to the technicians, one was sampled at regular intervals until the required number of carcasses was attained. Separate polyurethane sponges (Whirlpak speci-sponge, Nasco, USA) moistened with buffered peptone Direct plate sampling of the hands of operators Operators were requested to place the front and the back of each hand onto the surface of a Petri dish (14.5 cm diameter) containing Baird Parker Agar (BPA). Transport of samples to the laboratory All samples were packed in insulated containers with chiller packs for trans- SEPTEMBER 2008 | FOOD PROTECTION TRENDS 653
Table of Contents Feed for the Digital Edition of Food Protection Trends - September 2008 Food Protection Trends - September 2008 Contents Sustaining Members Perspectives from Your President Commentary from the Executive Director Controlling Staphylococcus aureus on Beef and Sheep Carcasses in Australia Fatal Food Allergy Reactions in Restaurants and Foodservice Establishments: Strategies for Prevention New Members Updates News Industry Products Coming Events Advertising Index Journal of Food Protection Table of Contents Audiovisual Library Order Form Booklet Order Form Membership Application Food Protection Trends - September 2008 Food Protection Trends - September 2008 - Food Protection Trends - September 2008 (Page Cover1) Food Protection Trends - September 2008 - Food Protection Trends - September 2008 (Page Cover2) Food Protection Trends - September 2008 - Food Protection Trends - September 2008 (Page 637) Food Protection Trends - September 2008 - Contents (Page 638) Food Protection Trends - September 2008 - Contents (Page 639) Food Protection Trends - September 2008 - Contents (Page 640) Food Protection Trends - September 2008 - Contents (Page 641) Food Protection Trends - September 2008 - Contents (Page 642) Food Protection Trends - September 2008 - Contents (Page 643) Food Protection Trends - September 2008 - Contents (Page 644) Food Protection Trends - September 2008 - Sustaining Members (Page 645) Food Protection Trends - September 2008 - Sustaining Members (Page 646) Food Protection Trends - September 2008 - Sustaining Members (Page 647) Food Protection Trends - September 2008 - Perspectives from Your President (Page 648) Food Protection Trends - September 2008 - Perspectives from Your President (Page 649) Food Protection Trends - September 2008 - Commentary from the Executive Director (Page 650) Food Protection Trends - September 2008 - Commentary from the Executive Director (Page 651) Food Protection Trends - September 2008 - Controlling Staphylococcus aureus on Beef and Sheep Carcasses in Australia (Page 652) Food Protection Trends - September 2008 - Controlling Staphylococcus aureus on Beef and Sheep Carcasses in Australia (Page 653) Food Protection Trends - September 2008 - Controlling Staphylococcus aureus on Beef and Sheep Carcasses in Australia (Page 654) Food Protection Trends - September 2008 - Controlling Staphylococcus aureus on Beef and Sheep Carcasses in Australia (Page 655) Food Protection Trends - September 2008 - Controlling Staphylococcus aureus on Beef and Sheep Carcasses in Australia (Page 656) Food Protection Trends - September 2008 - Fatal Food Allergy Reactions in Restaurants and Foodservice Establishments: Strategies for Prevention (Page 657) Food Protection Trends - September 2008 - Fatal Food Allergy Reactions in Restaurants and Foodservice Establishments: Strategies for Prevention (Page 658) Food Protection Trends - September 2008 - Fatal Food Allergy Reactions in Restaurants and Foodservice Establishments: Strategies for Prevention (Page 659) Food Protection Trends - September 2008 - Fatal Food Allergy Reactions in Restaurants and Foodservice Establishments: Strategies for Prevention (Page 660) Food Protection Trends - September 2008 - Fatal Food Allergy Reactions in Restaurants and Foodservice Establishments: Strategies for Prevention (Page 661) Food Protection Trends - September 2008 - Fatal Food Allergy Reactions in Restaurants and Foodservice Establishments: Strategies for Prevention (Page 662) Food Protection Trends - September 2008 - Fatal Food Allergy Reactions in Restaurants and Foodservice Establishments: Strategies for Prevention (Page 663) Food Protection Trends - September 2008 - New Members (Page 664) Food Protection Trends - September 2008 - New Members (Page 665) Food Protection Trends - September 2008 - New Members (Page 666) Food Protection Trends - September 2008 - New Members (Page 667) Food Protection Trends - September 2008 - New Members (Page 668) Food Protection Trends - September 2008 - New Members (Page 669) Food Protection Trends - September 2008 - Updates (Page 670) Food Protection Trends - September 2008 - News (Page 671) Food Protection Trends - September 2008 - News (Page 672) Food Protection Trends - September 2008 - News (Page 673) Food Protection Trends - September 2008 - News (Page 674) Food Protection Trends - September 2008 - Industry Products (Page 675) Food Protection Trends - September 2008 - Industry Products (Page 676) Food Protection Trends - September 2008 - Industry Products (Page 677) Food Protection Trends - September 2008 - Industry Products (Page 678) Food Protection Trends - September 2008 - Industry Products (Page 679) Food Protection Trends - September 2008 - Coming Events (Page 680) Food Protection Trends - September 2008 - Coming Events (Page 681) Food Protection Trends - September 2008 - Advertising Index (Page 682) Food Protection Trends - September 2008 - Journal of Food Protection Table of Contents (Page 683) Food Protection Trends - September 2008 - Journal of Food Protection Table of Contents (Page 684) Food Protection Trends - September 2008 - Journal of Food Protection Table of Contents (Page 685) Food Protection Trends - September 2008 - Audiovisual Library Order Form (Page 686) Food Protection Trends - September 2008 - Booklet Order Form (Page 687) Food Protection Trends - September 2008 - Membership Application (Page 688) Food Protection Trends - September 2008 - Membership Application (Page Cover3) Food Protection Trends - September 2008 - Membership Application (Page Cover4)
For optimal viewing of this digital publication, please enable JavaScript and then refresh the page. If you would like to try to load the digital publication without using Flash Player detection, please click here.