Food Protection Trends - September 2008 - (Page 654) TABLE 2. Prevalence and concentration of S. aureus on chilled carcasses at plants A–E Baseline 3 Plant n Prevalence (concentration*) n Present survey Prevalence (concentration*) Beef A B Sheep C D E 71 30 30 17.0 (1.90) 63.3 (1.50) 43.0 (1.30) 25 25 25 80 (1.0) 32 (1.23) 20 (0.84) 41 31 58.5 (0.97) 51.6 (1.06) 25 25 0 0 *Mean log10 count/cm2 of positive samples portation to an ISO17025-accredited laboratory for testing. Upon arrival at the laboratory, samples were held at 2–4°C until examination, which was always on the day after sampling. plate for coagulase testing with BHI broth and then rabbit plasma. S. aureus on freshly exposed surfaces after punching and final inspection At the “punching” station the operator separates a small area of fleece at each shoulder, called a “pocket,” then plunges his fist downwards to separate the fleece from underlying tissue. The process is called “pocket and punch” and involves the operator plunging his fisted hand and arm beneath the fleece at least to his elbow. After the fleece on each side has been punched, the operator pulls back on the fleece to release it from shoulder to rump. In the present study, the punched area on each side of the freshly exposed carcass was sponged immediately after the operator had completed pull-back. The S. aureus count was determined on a total of 15 carcasses; the organism was isolated from all carcasses mean log 0.45 log CFU/cm2 and varying -0.08 to 1.0 log CFU/cm2. At plant C, it was noted that carcasses were inspected at the end of the process by two operators, neither of whom wore gloves. Inspection involved significant handling of the rump and hind legs as operators turned, held and palpated the body during inspection. To adduce whether S. aureus had been transferred during inspection, carcasses were transferred to the retain rail and the entire hindquarters were sponged to a level just below the tail. Ten carcasses were sampled and S. aureus was isolated from RESULTS AND DISCUSSION S. aureus on beef and sheep carcasses In Table 2 are presented summary data for prevalence and concentration of S. aureus on chilled carcasses at five plants, selected because of the high prevalence of S. aureus on their carcasses as established in Baseline 3. In the interim, at beef plants A and B disposable gloves had been introduced and were worn by all operators at the time carcasses were sampled in the present study. As indicated in Table 2, S. aureus was not detected on any of the 25 samples from each plant, compared with over 50% prevalence in Baseline 3. At sheep plants D and E, disposable gloves are optional but were worn by a majority of operators, and this may be responsible for the reduction in prevalence and concentration of S. aureus in the present study, compared with Baseline 3. At plant C gloves were worn by all slaughter floor operators except for those involved in freeing the fleece by manual punching, and by staff at final inspection. Prevalence was much higher in the present survey than in Baseline 3, although the concentrations were lower. Accordingly, further investigation was undertaken to estimate contamination incurred at punching and final inspection. Determination of Total Viable Count (TVC), E. coli and coagulase-positive staphylococci Buffered peptone water (25 ml) was added to the sponge bag, which was squeezed by hand 10 times. Serial dilutions were prepared in 0.1% peptone water, using 1 ml aliquots. For TVC, duplicate Petrifilm plates (3M, Sydney, Australia) were prepared according to method AOAC 990.12 and incubated at 35oC/48 h, after which the colonies were counted and the count/cm2 recorded. Generic E. coli were estimated by placing 1ml aliquots of both the initial solution and appropriate dilutions onto duplicate E. coli Petrifilm (3M, Sydney, Australia) and incubating at 35oC for 48 h. Colonies were counted as per the manufacturer’s instructions and AOAC method 991.14. Coagulase-positive staphylococci on carcasses were determined using Australian Standard method AS1766.2.4, in which 0.5 ml aliquots were spread onto dried plates of Baird Parker agar (Merck, Melbourne, Australia) and incubated at 37°C for 48 h. Colonies with typical morphology (grey-black, shiny, convex colony with a narrow entire margin surrounded by a zone of clearing) were picked off the 654 FOOD PROTECTION TRENDS | SEPTEMBER 2008
Table of Contents Feed for the Digital Edition of Food Protection Trends - September 2008 Food Protection Trends - September 2008 Contents Sustaining Members Perspectives from Your President Commentary from the Executive Director Controlling Staphylococcus aureus on Beef and Sheep Carcasses in Australia Fatal Food Allergy Reactions in Restaurants and Foodservice Establishments:Strategies for Prevention New Members Updates News Industry Products Coming Events Advertising Index Journal of Food Protection Table of Contents Audiovisual Library Order Form Booklet Order Form Membership Application Food Protection Trends - September 2008 Food Protection Trends - September 2008 - Food Protection Trends - September 2008 (Page Cover1) Food Protection Trends - September 2008 - Food Protection Trends - September 2008 (Page Cover2) Food Protection Trends - September 2008 - Food Protection Trends - September 2008 (Page 637) Food Protection Trends - September 2008 - Contents (Page 638) Food Protection Trends - September 2008 - Contents (Page 639) Food Protection Trends - September 2008 - Contents (Page 640) Food Protection Trends - September 2008 - Contents (Page 641) Food Protection Trends - September 2008 - Contents (Page 642) Food Protection Trends - September 2008 - Contents (Page 643) Food Protection Trends - September 2008 - Contents (Page 644) Food Protection Trends - September 2008 - Sustaining Members (Page 645) Food Protection Trends - September 2008 - Sustaining Members (Page 646) Food Protection Trends - September 2008 - Sustaining Members (Page 647) Food Protection Trends - September 2008 - Perspectives from Your President (Page 648) Food Protection Trends - September 2008 - Perspectives from Your President (Page 649) Food Protection Trends - September 2008 - Commentary from the Executive Director (Page 650) Food Protection Trends - September 2008 - Commentary from the Executive Director (Page 651) Food Protection Trends - September 2008 - Controlling Staphylococcus aureus on Beef and Sheep Carcasses in Australia (Page 652) Food Protection Trends - September 2008 - Controlling Staphylococcus aureus on Beef and Sheep Carcasses in Australia (Page 653) Food Protection Trends - September 2008 - Controlling Staphylococcus aureus on Beef and Sheep Carcasses in Australia (Page 654) Food Protection Trends - September 2008 - Controlling Staphylococcus aureus on Beef and Sheep Carcasses in Australia (Page 655) Food Protection Trends - September 2008 - Controlling Staphylococcus aureus on Beef and Sheep Carcasses in Australia (Page 656) Food Protection Trends - September 2008 - Fatal Food Allergy Reactions in Restaurants and Foodservice Establishments:Strategies for Prevention (Page 657) Food Protection Trends - September 2008 - Fatal Food Allergy Reactions in Restaurants and Foodservice Establishments:Strategies for Prevention (Page 658) Food Protection Trends - September 2008 - Fatal Food Allergy Reactions in Restaurants and Foodservice Establishments:Strategies for Prevention (Page 659) Food Protection Trends - September 2008 - Fatal Food Allergy Reactions in Restaurants and Foodservice Establishments:Strategies for Prevention (Page 660) Food Protection Trends - September 2008 - Fatal Food Allergy Reactions in Restaurants and Foodservice Establishments:Strategies for Prevention (Page 661) Food Protection Trends - September 2008 - Fatal Food Allergy Reactions in Restaurants and Foodservice Establishments:Strategies for Prevention (Page 662) Food Protection Trends - September 2008 - Fatal Food Allergy Reactions in Restaurants and Foodservice Establishments:Strategies for Prevention (Page 663) Food Protection Trends - September 2008 - New Members (Page 664) Food Protection Trends - September 2008 - New Members (Page 665) Food Protection Trends - September 2008 - New Members (Page 666) Food Protection Trends - September 2008 - New Members (Page 667) Food Protection Trends - September 2008 - New Members (Page 668) Food Protection Trends - September 2008 - New Members (Page 669) Food Protection Trends - September 2008 - Updates (Page 670) Food Protection Trends - September 2008 - News (Page 671) Food Protection Trends - September 2008 - News (Page 672) Food Protection Trends - September 2008 - News (Page 673) Food Protection Trends - September 2008 - News (Page 674) Food Protection Trends - September 2008 - Industry Products (Page 675) Food Protection Trends - September 2008 - Industry Products (Page 676) Food Protection Trends - September 2008 - Industry Products (Page 677) Food Protection Trends - September 2008 - Industry Products (Page 678) Food Protection Trends - September 2008 - Industry Products (Page 679) Food Protection Trends - September 2008 - Coming Events (Page 680) Food Protection Trends - September 2008 - Coming Events (Page 681) Food Protection Trends - September 2008 - Advertising Index (Page 682) Food Protection Trends - September 2008 - Journal of Food Protection Table of Contents (Page 683) Food Protection Trends - September 2008 - Journal of Food Protection Table of Contents (Page 684) Food Protection Trends - September 2008 - Journal of Food Protection Table of Contents (Page 685) Food Protection Trends - September 2008 - Audiovisual Library Order Form (Page 686) Food Protection Trends - September 2008 - Booklet Order Form (Page 687) Food Protection Trends - September 2008 - Membership Application (Page 688) Food Protection Trends - September 2008 - Membership Application (Page Cover3) Food Protection Trends - September 2008 - Membership Application (Page Cover4)
For optimal viewing of this digital publication, please enable JavaScript and then refresh the page. If you would like to try to load the digital publication without using Flash Player detection, please click here.