Health Imaging & IT - April 2008 - (Page 16) special secTion advanced visualizaTion By Lisa Fratt o p T i o ns g a lo R e After more than five years on the market, 3D options continue to evolve to better meet the diverse needs of radiologists, cardiologists and a variety of specialists. With a wide array of options available, hospitals can devise a 3D rendering program to meet their unique needs. For some, the 3D lab approach offers the best first-line model. Other sites aim to put 3D tools in the hands of heavy users like orthopedic and trauma surgeons via a thin-client system. Outsourcing is another option that suits sites that lack the volume to justify a full-time solution or require overflow coverage. In many cases, a hybrid approach that blends various models offers the ideal solution. This month, Health Imaging & IT visits a few sites to learn more about the ins and outs of a variety of 3D rendering models. The 3d lab approach The 3D lab is a commonly employed 3D rendering option. Many facilities and groups centralize 3D post-processing in a lab, using super-techs to complete the lion’s share of 3D post-processing and reconstructions. Take for example Spectrum Health in Grand Rapids, Mich. The health system uses a full-fledged 3D lab with six facilities porting CT and MRI studies to the central lab for 3D post-processing. The lab is staffed by two full-time 3D imaging specialists with an additional six techs trained to handle 3D reconstructions, which ensures 24/7 coverage. The 3D solutions include TeraRecon Aquarius and GE Healthcare AW workstations and TeraRecon AquariusNET thin-client system for enterprise wide access to 3D applications and GE Remote Access software for remote access to GE 3D workstation functionality. The clinical caseload is varied, but predictable, with vascular studies like emergency carotids dominating the 3D workload, says 3D Imaging Specialist Shannon Culver. The lab completes between 600 and 650 billable 3D cases monthly; about 400 cases are CT reconstructions, and the remainder are MR studies. With nearly four years under its belt, Spectrum Health’s 3D lab has fine-tuned its workflow. Routine outpatient 3D studies are auto-routed to the 3D lab, post-processed according to protocols and sent to PACS for storage with the original study. “The workflow was challenging when we opened the lab. It took some time to determine if it would be best to pull studies or auto-route them and if patient information should be phoned, texted, emailed or faxed,” recalls Culver. Currently, paperwork for routine cases is faxed to the lab. The health system uses text paging to facilitate rapid turn-around for emergency cases. In addition, 16 Health Imaging & IT | april 2008 [ aneurysm captured on terarecon’s aquariusnEt ] AquariusNET is integrated with PACS, so physicians can access 3D applications enterprise-wide. The 3D lab model optimizes patient care, says Culver. “It takes consistency and continuity to provide the best patient care. Spectrum Health has dedicated many man hours to developing and tailoring 3D protocols. As a result, our physicians receive consistent, replicable 3D reconstructions.” Similarly, University of Minnesota Medical Center Fairview in Minneapolis, Minn., has employed an Advanced Imaging/ Post-Processing Lab for five years. The lab is equipped with three post-processing workstations that run Vital Images Vitrea, TeraRecon Aquarius and Barco Voxar 3D software and handles about 200 3D cases monthly. Healthimaging.com http://Healthimaging.com
Table of Contents Feed for the Digital Edition of Health Imaging & IT - April 2008 Health Imaging & IT - April 2008 Contents On the Web The Enterprise News Update Cracking Down: CT Radiation Dose 3D Rendering: Options Galore Thinking Thin-Client Modality Review Ergonomics & Design Special Section: Storage Strategies Imaging Tools Technology Outlook People & Technology Technology Review IT Trends Reader's Resource Stat Sheet Health Imaging & IT - April 2008 Health Imaging & IT - April 2008 - Health Imaging & IT - April 2008 (Page Cover1) Health Imaging & IT - April 2008 - Health Imaging & IT - April 2008 (Page Cover2) Health Imaging & IT - April 2008 - Health Imaging & IT - April 2008 (Page 1) Health Imaging & IT - April 2008 - Health Imaging & IT - April 2008 (Page 2) Health Imaging & IT - April 2008 - Contents (Page 3) Health Imaging & IT - April 2008 - On the Web (Page 4) Health Imaging & IT - April 2008 - On the Web (Page 5) Health Imaging & IT - April 2008 - On the Web (Page 6) Health Imaging & IT - April 2008 - The Enterprise (Page 7) Health Imaging & IT - April 2008 - News Update (Page 8) Health Imaging & IT - April 2008 - News Update (Page 9) Health Imaging & IT - April 2008 - News Update (Page 10) Health Imaging & IT - April 2008 - News Update (Page 11) Health Imaging & IT - April 2008 - Cracking Down: CT Radiation Dose (Page 12) Health Imaging & IT - April 2008 - Cracking Down: CT Radiation Dose (Page 13) Health Imaging & IT - April 2008 - Cracking Down: CT Radiation Dose (Page 14) Health Imaging & IT - April 2008 - Cracking Down: CT Radiation Dose (Page 15) Health Imaging & IT - April 2008 - 3D Rendering: Options Galore (Page 16) Health Imaging & IT - April 2008 - 3D Rendering: Options Galore (Page 17) Health Imaging & IT - April 2008 - 3D Rendering: Options Galore (Page 18) Health Imaging & IT - April 2008 - 3D Rendering: Options Galore (Page 19) Health Imaging & IT - April 2008 - Thinking Thin-Client (Page 20) Health Imaging & IT - April 2008 - Thinking Thin-Client (Page 21) Health Imaging & IT - April 2008 - Thinking Thin-Client (Page 22) Health Imaging & IT - April 2008 - Thinking Thin-Client (Page 23) Health Imaging & IT - April 2008 - Modality Review (Page 24) Health Imaging & IT - April 2008 - Modality Review (Page 25) Health Imaging & IT - April 2008 - Ergonomics & Design (Page 26) Health Imaging & IT - April 2008 - Ergonomics & Design (Page 27) Health Imaging & IT - April 2008 - Ergonomics & Design (Page 28) Health Imaging & IT - April 2008 - Ergonomics & Design (Page 29) Health Imaging & IT - April 2008 - Special Section: Storage Strategies (Page 30) Health Imaging & IT - April 2008 - Special Section: Storage Strategies (Page 31) Health Imaging & IT - April 2008 - Special Section: Storage Strategies (Page 32) Health Imaging & IT - April 2008 - Special Section: Storage Strategies (Page 33) Health Imaging & IT - April 2008 - Imaging Tools (Page 34) Health Imaging & IT - April 2008 - Imaging Tools (Page 35) Health Imaging & IT - April 2008 - Technology Outlook (Page 36) Health Imaging & IT - April 2008 - Technology Outlook (Page 37) Health Imaging & IT - April 2008 - People & Technology (Page 38) Health Imaging & IT - April 2008 - People & Technology (Page 39) Health Imaging & IT - April 2008 - People & Technology (Page 40) Health Imaging & IT - April 2008 - People & Technology (Page 41) Health Imaging & IT - April 2008 - Technology Review (Page 42) Health Imaging & IT - April 2008 - Technology Review (Page 43) Health Imaging & IT - April 2008 - IT Trends (Page 44) Health Imaging & IT - April 2008 - IT Trends (Page 45) Health Imaging & IT - April 2008 - IT Trends (Page 46) Health Imaging & IT - April 2008 - Reader's Resource (Page 47) Health Imaging & IT - April 2008 - Stat Sheet (Page 48) Health Imaging & IT - April 2008 - Stat Sheet (Page Cover3) Health Imaging & IT - April 2008 - Stat Sheet (Page Cover4)
For optimal viewing of this digital publication, please enable JavaScript and then refresh the page. If you would like to try to load the digital publication without using Flash Player detection, please click here.