Health Imaging & IT - April 2008 - (Page 31) sponsored by an educational grant from EMC Corporation With 21,000 employees and 2,200 physicians, Fraser Health Authority in British Columbia, Canada, is one of the country’s largest and fastest growing health authorities. Fraser provides care for 1.5 million people in its 12 acute-care hospitals as well as home health, mental health, and public health services. The authority operates with an annual budget of $1.9 billion. systems—moving the data from one to the other—which went fine, he reports. “I have a good comfort level that the data will be there when we ask for the data. We go through the validation process at least once a year to make sure that the data the application thinks are there exists and are retrievable.” self-healing and scalable an early adopter The implementation of a new PACS five years ago led to the need for a more sophisticated, leading edge storage solution. Fraser elected to invest in EMC Centera content-addressed storage (CAS), becoming an early adopter of the EMC Centera archiving platform and replacing its tape library system. By implementing PACS, “we were going to a new application that would generate significant data to be archived that we couldn’t manage in a tape environment,” says James Pink, manager of technical support and operations. EMC has been Fraser’s strategic partner for storage for many years. Five years ago EMC was the only vendor that had a content-addressed storage system. Pink says they are currently storing about 240 terabytes (TB) of data in two EMC Centera units. Their volume is growing at about 10 terabytes a year. But, “that’s only with our initial PACS implementation,” Pink says. “We’re looking at expanding our whole archiving infrastructure to other applications. It’s going to grow a lot more.” Right now, the organization’s PACS implementation includes a range of basic imaging modalities, including CT scanners, but the volume is expanding at a phenomenal rate, he adds. One EMC Centera is primary; the other is secondary, and both are housed in different data centers. “We’ve done testing to be able to flip over the applications from one to the other,” says Pink. He recently went through a refresh of the EMC Centera EMC Centera One of the benefits of EMC Centera is its self-healing capabilities. If archiving issues occur, EMC Centera detects and resolves them, which is a huge benefit for us, Pink says. He also appreciates the system’s ability to enforce regulatory requirements for retention policies which ensures that data are not accidentally deleted and being single instance storage dramatically reduces the amount of storage required to retain images. “If I wrote the same file to the EMC Centera, it only keeps one copy of it, but I have two pointers to it,” explains Pink. At Fraser, cardiology patient information is retained on shortterm storage for 90 days, and PACS information for six months. With EMC Centera, Pink has been able to eliminate many costs associated with information backup. Less short-term storage translates to reduced backup windows and less tape media to purchase. Plus, online archiving makes all PACS and cardiology information immediately accessible. EMC Centera is easy to scale and manage. Pink can simply add more storage capacity as needed. “At some point, we will look at carving off from multiple units to one or two large units. We are working with EMC on where and when it makes sense to do that.” data protection Data storage at Bloomington Hospital in Bloomington, Ind., is growing at 8.2 TB a year, which requires almost annual expan- Healthimaging.com april 2008 | Health Imaging & IT 31 http://Healthimaging.com
Table of Contents Feed for the Digital Edition of Health Imaging & IT - April 2008 Health Imaging & IT - April 2008 Contents On the Web The Enterprise News Update Cracking Down: CT Radiation Dose 3D Rendering: Options Galore Thinking Thin-Client Modality Review Ergonomics & Design Special Section: Storage Strategies Imaging Tools Technology Outlook People & Technology Technology Review IT Trends Reader's Resource Stat Sheet Health Imaging & IT - April 2008 Health Imaging & IT - April 2008 - Health Imaging & IT - April 2008 (Page Cover1) Health Imaging & IT - April 2008 - Health Imaging & IT - April 2008 (Page Cover2) Health Imaging & IT - April 2008 - Health Imaging & IT - April 2008 (Page 1) Health Imaging & IT - April 2008 - Health Imaging & IT - April 2008 (Page 2) Health Imaging & IT - April 2008 - Contents (Page 3) Health Imaging & IT - April 2008 - On the Web (Page 4) Health Imaging & IT - April 2008 - On the Web (Page 5) Health Imaging & IT - April 2008 - On the Web (Page 6) Health Imaging & IT - April 2008 - The Enterprise (Page 7) Health Imaging & IT - April 2008 - News Update (Page 8) Health Imaging & IT - April 2008 - News Update (Page 9) Health Imaging & IT - April 2008 - News Update (Page 10) Health Imaging & IT - April 2008 - News Update (Page 11) Health Imaging & IT - April 2008 - Cracking Down: CT Radiation Dose (Page 12) Health Imaging & IT - April 2008 - Cracking Down: CT Radiation Dose (Page 13) Health Imaging & IT - April 2008 - Cracking Down: CT Radiation Dose (Page 14) Health Imaging & IT - April 2008 - Cracking Down: CT Radiation Dose (Page 15) Health Imaging & IT - April 2008 - 3D Rendering: Options Galore (Page 16) Health Imaging & IT - April 2008 - 3D Rendering: Options Galore (Page 17) Health Imaging & IT - April 2008 - 3D Rendering: Options Galore (Page 18) Health Imaging & IT - April 2008 - 3D Rendering: Options Galore (Page 19) Health Imaging & IT - April 2008 - Thinking Thin-Client (Page 20) Health Imaging & IT - April 2008 - Thinking Thin-Client (Page 21) Health Imaging & IT - April 2008 - Thinking Thin-Client (Page 22) Health Imaging & IT - April 2008 - Thinking Thin-Client (Page 23) Health Imaging & IT - April 2008 - Modality Review (Page 24) Health Imaging & IT - April 2008 - Modality Review (Page 25) Health Imaging & IT - April 2008 - Ergonomics & Design (Page 26) Health Imaging & IT - April 2008 - Ergonomics & Design (Page 27) Health Imaging & IT - April 2008 - Ergonomics & Design (Page 28) Health Imaging & IT - April 2008 - Ergonomics & Design (Page 29) Health Imaging & IT - April 2008 - Special Section: Storage Strategies (Page 30) Health Imaging & IT - April 2008 - Special Section: Storage Strategies (Page 31) Health Imaging & IT - April 2008 - Special Section: Storage Strategies (Page 32) Health Imaging & IT - April 2008 - Special Section: Storage Strategies (Page 33) Health Imaging & IT - April 2008 - Imaging Tools (Page 34) Health Imaging & IT - April 2008 - Imaging Tools (Page 35) Health Imaging & IT - April 2008 - Technology Outlook (Page 36) Health Imaging & IT - April 2008 - Technology Outlook (Page 37) Health Imaging & IT - April 2008 - People & Technology (Page 38) Health Imaging & IT - April 2008 - People & Technology (Page 39) Health Imaging & IT - April 2008 - People & Technology (Page 40) Health Imaging & IT - April 2008 - People & Technology (Page 41) Health Imaging & IT - April 2008 - Technology Review (Page 42) Health Imaging & IT - April 2008 - Technology Review (Page 43) Health Imaging & IT - April 2008 - IT Trends (Page 44) Health Imaging & IT - April 2008 - IT Trends (Page 45) Health Imaging & IT - April 2008 - IT Trends (Page 46) Health Imaging & IT - April 2008 - Reader's Resource (Page 47) Health Imaging & IT - April 2008 - Stat Sheet (Page 48) Health Imaging & IT - April 2008 - Stat Sheet (Page Cover3) Health Imaging & IT - April 2008 - Stat Sheet (Page Cover4)
For optimal viewing of this digital publication, please enable JavaScript and then refresh the page. If you would like to try to load the digital publication without using Flash Player detection, please click here.