Health Imaging & IT - April 2008 - (Page 37) “We can see this move from speech not just delivering text but really becoming part of whole workflow, becoming part of the way people document.” imaging centers headquartered in Spokane, Wash., where SpeechQ version 1.2 was beta tested. “With this release comes a new and improved integration between the Philips iSite [PACS] and SpeechQ,” he says. The integration is more bidirectional so users can open images from iSite and have that drive SpeechQ and vice versa. “Instead of having to hunt and peck for images in iSite, they can work off of a SpeechQ worklist.” Another integration aspect of the new SpeechQ that Koller appreciates is the ability to break integration between iSite and SpeechQ. That will be helpful when radiologists are signing off on reports or even when they’re doing rounds. When pulling up a lot of studies within iSite, they can temporarily suspend integration. Integration is a very, very important part of making speech recognition technology easier for physicians to accept and use, says Spring. “The physician lives at the desktop. We’ve already demonstrated improved patient care and return on investment with speech recognition. Now we have to make it easier for the physician to accept the technology.” Before digital dictation, Inland radiologists spent a lot of time re-reviewing exams, Koller says. Now, radiologists can spend more time on each exam, but the organization gets more work out of the radiologist per day. “We can grow with our existing base of radiologists,” he adds. Before implementing SpeechQ, Inland typically had 4,000 to 5,000 reports in the queue awaiting transcription. Today, 90 to 95 percent of reports are turned around in 30 minutes. klaus stanglmayr, strategic product marketing manager, Philips craving critical test results Terence Matalon, MD, chairman of the department of Radiology for Albert Einstein Medical Center in Philadelphia, has been using PowerScribe from Nuance for about two years. When he joined the facility in 2003, average report turn-around time was 112 hours. Thanks to the implementation of both Fujifim’s Synapse PACS and PowerScribe, turn-around time is now 12 hours. Although that’s a significant improvement, turn-around time “is a movHealthimaging.com ing target,” he says. “There’s always going to be an increasing demand to shorten that time. The ideal is to have a completed, verified report at the completion of the exam.” While the facility’s users have been pleased with the product, they’re even more excited now due to recent integrations with critical test results utilization. The hospital already purchased Vocada’s Veriphy—designed to ensure and document the transfer of critical test results to referring clinicians—before Nuance acquired the company last year. The integration of Veriphy into the PowerScribe desktop increases productivity, Matalon says, by eliminating the need to have two applications open to attain the same goal. With the timely communication of critical test results being one of The Joint Commission’s new patient safety goals, Matalon says it’s important for institutions to be able to produce reports on communication of critical test results. “It’s just a fantastic tool to both improve quality and to decrease the amount of wasted time we would have on the radiology side to ensure that a communication was made.” Now that it’s an integrated product, users don’t have to re-enter patient information. Another plus is that users don’t have to remember to click on a separate icon to open such ancillary applications. The facility uses RadPeer, the American College of Radiology’s quality assurance program. Much like the integration of Veriphy, RadPeer is now integrated with the facility’s PACS. Those kind of streamlining efforts are what will differentiate one speech product from the others, he says. “There are dozens of products that can reliably show you the current exam, prior exam and reports. The differentiating factor is how well they integrate with third parties and how well they reduce amount of work involved in interpreting reports and generating reports.” Systems is working on nursing documentation and tying in more content for decision support. “In essence, we want to showcase a patient encounter module that allows you to dictate freely and structure the information as much as possible,” says Klaus Stanglmayr, strategic product marketing manager. Currently, Philips is showcasing a prototype that works with VoiceViewer which provides nurses with a recorder that they carry to the bedside. Anything they enter into the recorder is converted from speech to text and inserted into the appropriate template or IT system. “We think the key is even tighter integration into systems people will be using in the future,” he says. “I think we can see this move from speech not just delivering text but really becoming part of whole workflow, becoming part of the way people document.” Interoperability and the ability to exchange data between systems and countries is becoming more and more critical in Europe, Stanglmayr says. Standardized terminology would prevent the need to have data translated from one language to another. While he used to see clients focused on documents, now countries such as Spain and Norway have initiated regional programs. going forward Rosenthal has noticed that the skepticism surrounding speech recognition of five years ago is gone. “People see what I’m doing and every single department wants in. Everybody acknowledges that they want a readable, standardized chart,” he says. “From what I’m hearing, there’s an openness to get notes done faster in the foreground.” However, if speech systems aren’t relatively uniform, he says, people will find systems on their own and use them. “Then you have a hodgepodge of systems that don’t talk to each other and standardization is lost,” he says. “We are much better investing in something uniform.” april 2008 | Health Imaging & IT 3 nursing in the loop Meanwhile, Philips Speech Recognition http://Healthimaging.com
Table of Contents Feed for the Digital Edition of Health Imaging & IT - April 2008 Health Imaging & IT - April 2008 Contents On the Web The Enterprise News Update Cracking Down: CT Radiation Dose 3D Rendering: Options Galore Thinking Thin-Client Modality Review Ergonomics & Design Special Section: Storage Strategies Imaging Tools Technology Outlook People & Technology Technology Review IT Trends Reader's Resource Stat Sheet Health Imaging & IT - April 2008 Health Imaging & IT - April 2008 - Health Imaging & IT - April 2008 (Page Cover1) Health Imaging & IT - April 2008 - Health Imaging & IT - April 2008 (Page Cover2) Health Imaging & IT - April 2008 - Health Imaging & IT - April 2008 (Page 1) Health Imaging & IT - April 2008 - Health Imaging & IT - April 2008 (Page 2) Health Imaging & IT - April 2008 - Contents (Page 3) Health Imaging & IT - April 2008 - On the Web (Page 4) Health Imaging & IT - April 2008 - On the Web (Page 5) Health Imaging & IT - April 2008 - On the Web (Page 6) Health Imaging & IT - April 2008 - The Enterprise (Page 7) Health Imaging & IT - April 2008 - News Update (Page 8) Health Imaging & IT - April 2008 - News Update (Page 9) Health Imaging & IT - April 2008 - News Update (Page 10) Health Imaging & IT - April 2008 - News Update (Page 11) Health Imaging & IT - April 2008 - Cracking Down: CT Radiation Dose (Page 12) Health Imaging & IT - April 2008 - Cracking Down: CT Radiation Dose (Page 13) Health Imaging & IT - April 2008 - Cracking Down: CT Radiation Dose (Page 14) Health Imaging & IT - April 2008 - Cracking Down: CT Radiation Dose (Page 15) Health Imaging & IT - April 2008 - 3D Rendering: Options Galore (Page 16) Health Imaging & IT - April 2008 - 3D Rendering: Options Galore (Page 17) Health Imaging & IT - April 2008 - 3D Rendering: Options Galore (Page 18) Health Imaging & IT - April 2008 - 3D Rendering: Options Galore (Page 19) Health Imaging & IT - April 2008 - Thinking Thin-Client (Page 20) Health Imaging & IT - April 2008 - Thinking Thin-Client (Page 21) Health Imaging & IT - April 2008 - Thinking Thin-Client (Page 22) Health Imaging & IT - April 2008 - Thinking Thin-Client (Page 23) Health Imaging & IT - April 2008 - Modality Review (Page 24) Health Imaging & IT - April 2008 - Modality Review (Page 25) Health Imaging & IT - April 2008 - Ergonomics & Design (Page 26) Health Imaging & IT - April 2008 - Ergonomics & Design (Page 27) Health Imaging & IT - April 2008 - Ergonomics & Design (Page 28) Health Imaging & IT - April 2008 - Ergonomics & Design (Page 29) Health Imaging & IT - April 2008 - Special Section: Storage Strategies (Page 30) Health Imaging & IT - April 2008 - Special Section: Storage Strategies (Page 31) Health Imaging & IT - April 2008 - Special Section: Storage Strategies (Page 32) Health Imaging & IT - April 2008 - Special Section: Storage Strategies (Page 33) Health Imaging & IT - April 2008 - Imaging Tools (Page 34) Health Imaging & IT - April 2008 - Imaging Tools (Page 35) Health Imaging & IT - April 2008 - Technology Outlook (Page 36) Health Imaging & IT - April 2008 - Technology Outlook (Page 37) Health Imaging & IT - April 2008 - People & Technology (Page 38) Health Imaging & IT - April 2008 - People & Technology (Page 39) Health Imaging & IT - April 2008 - People & Technology (Page 40) Health Imaging & IT - April 2008 - People & Technology (Page 41) Health Imaging & IT - April 2008 - Technology Review (Page 42) Health Imaging & IT - April 2008 - Technology Review (Page 43) Health Imaging & IT - April 2008 - IT Trends (Page 44) Health Imaging & IT - April 2008 - IT Trends (Page 45) Health Imaging & IT - April 2008 - IT Trends (Page 46) Health Imaging & IT - April 2008 - Reader's Resource (Page 47) Health Imaging & IT - April 2008 - Stat Sheet (Page 48) Health Imaging & IT - April 2008 - Stat Sheet (Page Cover3) Health Imaging & IT - April 2008 - Stat Sheet (Page Cover4)
For optimal viewing of this digital publication, please enable JavaScript and then refresh the page. If you would like to try to load the digital publication without using Flash Player detection, please click here.